Status Updates From Matthew, Volume 1: Chapters...

The way Doriani is breaking up his sermons, taking fairly big chucks, makes it difficult to use his commentary unless you break it up in a similar way.
As an example, he makes Matt 4:18-25 into one sermon, whereas almost any preacher is going to make those into two different sermons. This changes concluding application and main idea for those passages.

Not a fan of the way his exposition style. Doriani essentially takes the passage and topically preaches it. His main points are not chronological (#1: v.4-5, #2: v.6-7...). His main points jump around within his pericope and it makes it hard to follow. A lot of the illustrations are a stretch on how relevant it is to the passage.