Status Updates From Beyond Creation Science

The scene in the tomb held a powerful connection to the mercy-seat
covering on the ark of the covenant (Ex. 25:17-20).

in this section he has (well deserved) hard critisim of both the young and old earth dispensation positions and makes a strong case that there is no difference beetwen their posions and gnostism

So far built a case based on scripture for a local flood and that this is keeping with a preterist eschatology. I have yet to find anything to disagree with up to this point.

on page 147 we have Ken Ham and 148 Charles Ryrie and Tim LaHaye.

No wonder Noah took up drinking!

On page 120 we have Leonard Read's "I,Pencil" Timothy Martin has shown himself to be a deep lover of truth and has a broad understanding of different deciplines which has helped greatly in building his case. So far this foundation is as solid as one could imagine.

On page 101 we get the first reference to Hugh Ross as we have had a lengthy description of how the church has looked at creation in the last 100 years. We are then back to Gary North... What has bothered me about the Creation Science movement for almost two decades is that its leaders will not admit that they have mixed together a particular view of eschatology that has nothing to do with the ... physical science.

On page 96 I was happy to find a reference to Gary North. This book is all over the place connecting many unrelated scholars. So far I have not yet found much to complain about. All this material (so far) can be found in other works but it is neat to have it in a single place.

A long list of prophetic events and their fullfillment in scripture, or writings of Josepus or others. These are very dark events most do not want to study which are all noted here.

A good start so far from a Pererist perspective. He is building a solid ground work for where he wants to go later.