Coursera: Fantasy and Science Fiction (Summer 2012) discussion
Unit IV: Shelley
>
Frankenstein
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jute
(new)
Aug 16, 2012 08:27PM

reply
|
flag

The arrogance of both the narrators is really grating on me at 30% and I don't have much idea what I'm going to write yet. :(


I equate Victor Frankenstein's initial scientific brilliance, idealism, and naiveté to the Enlightenment, and those philosophers (Kant, Locke, Voltaire) and how he created his Creature which he thought was the pinnacle of scientific thought (French Revolution/Napoleon), but it backfired on him and he created a creature he couldn't control and didn't want to be responsible for (just how Enlightenment philosophers refused to believe that the Reign of Terror, or Napoleon where in direct consequence to the age of Enlightenment). Then, the destruction of Frankenstein (destruction of European amity and idealism in the wake of Napoleon, which lead to staunch nationalism and more crappola).
My thoughts aren't all organized or even focused, but this is what I was thinking about the entire time. It's difficult for me to not read so much of this sort of thought into this novel, since Shelley's mother wrote extensively on the French Revolution, and Shelley's poet husband (along with the people she surrounded herself with) where such admirers of the Promethean Myth and it's metaphorical comparisons to revolution.
This argument is most strong if I just focus on Frankenstein, and not the Creature.
...I hope I made sense.


I'm having trouble finishing the book because the Kindle text is so riddled with errors. :(

I'm having trouble finishing the book because the Kindle text is so riddled with errors. :("
I'm reading the e-book too, but there are sooo many mistakes! Half of the time I'm trying to figure out whether what I'm reading is a real word (old English, I don't know, not my native language) or a typo! But I am enjoying the book, surprisingly, although I haven't written my essay yet...

I gave up and got my print copy down off the shelf, it was the only way I could get it finished. And I *still* don't know what to write about tonight. It's the first one I've really struggled to find something interesting to write about...I keep rejecting ideas as "oh, everyone will have done that to death already". *sigh*


I'm trying to work up something on the theme of loneliness/isolation, or the use of landscape as a contrast tool for heightening the horror. Don't know...I hate being behind, I usually do the essay on a Sunday but it's been so busy this week.
Grumble, grumble. I'll get there! And then I really need to get the jump on Hawthorne & Poe as we're away next weekend.

I'd never read it and I was amazed at how little of the book has been kept for any of the various movies I've seen. Even with Dracula they kept more of the original story, but for Frankenstein Hollywood has really butchered it!

Haven't they just! Even though I'd read it before I was still convinced Frankenstein had a lab assistant (the prototype Igor "Yeash, Mashter" creature). And where did I find him? In Hawthorne's The Birthmark, one of next week's stories. :)

I think this would be a very interesting essay to read! Maybe mix in some psychology? I say, go for it, do some research and make a plan - that is unless you already wrote something. I hope I'm not the only lazy one around here...

I see they've put an "agree to the honour code" box in this week. I was really sad to read the articles about plagarism :(