Brain Pain discussion

This topic is about
House of Leaves
Cluster Headache Two - 2012
>
CH2 - House Of Leaves - Schedule/Questions/Resources
date
newest »


Zee wrote: "Boy are you all in for a real headache. *grinz*"
We're all about the brain pain at Brain Pain...
Did you like the book or was it painful?
We're all about the brain pain at Brain Pain...
Did you like the book or was it painful?

We're all about the brain pain at Brain Pain...
Did you like the book or was it painful?"
Loved it. Read it a few years back and was blown away by just what an author could DO if he knew his genre as well as Danielewski obviously does.
With this book you'll have LOTS to talk about. I personally enjoyed the hidden codes/ riddles MD left like a papertrail for his readers. Favourite character is Zampano. A modern day Tiresias. Genius.
Does anyone have any recommendations on good material about the Yggdrasil? I'm curious and would like to learn more.

The codes and riddles are exactly why I'm thrilled to read this one with other people. I've tried to read House of Leaves a couple times, but had no one to discuss it with. I wasn't sure what it was I was supposed to be seeing, or if I was seeing what I thought I was seeing, or if I was just making stuff up in my head. Trippy.



Good suggestion, though the second half flags a bit I feel
Reading tip: It took me about four hours to get through chapter 9, which is all about labyrinths. Set aside a big block of time for reading this chapter!
aPriL MEOWS often with scratching wrote: "I got the book, but its sitting on my table, unopened."
I'm finding this to be one of my favorite reads of the year. Many people talk about this as a horror story because of what happens in the house, but to me, that aspect is far from central to the themes of this book. Instead, I'm finding a tongue-in-cheek poke at academia, documentaries, the media, the internet, "experts", and so on, all wrapped up in a package that reminds me of the scope and range of Joyce's Ulysses. I've been laughing out loud while reading in a way that usually happens when I watch South Park.
April, I know that in general, you're critical of philosophers and brainiacs, based on your Hopscotch comments. I may be wrong, but I think you're going to find plenty to laugh at in this book too. It's atomic-mega-meta-fiction unlike anything I've come across before.
There are many voices, but the primary are:
Zampanò - who wrote The Navidson Record
Johnny Truant - who assembled the book for publication
The characters within The Navidson Record
The voices of the experts commenting on The Navidson Record
The footnotes are another level of narration:
Zampanò comments on the expert opinions
Johnny comments on the expert opinions, Zampanò's ideas, and tells lengthy, related and unrelated stories about his life, past and present
The publisher comments on Johnny's comments
BTW, I would recommend reading all the footnotes because they are very much a part of the narrative. There are some footnotes which are only long lists of names, which can be skipped, unless you're on Ritalin and have the time...
One important footnote comes in Chapter V, page 72, #78, where the publisher suggests reading Johnny's father's obituary and his mother's letters. The letters in particular are essential to understanding what Johnny is all about.
Anyway, what I'm realizing is that this is not a novel so much as a great intellectual treasure hunt through the minds of fictitious characters, authors, and academics. Enjoy!
I'm finding this to be one of my favorite reads of the year. Many people talk about this as a horror story because of what happens in the house, but to me, that aspect is far from central to the themes of this book. Instead, I'm finding a tongue-in-cheek poke at academia, documentaries, the media, the internet, "experts", and so on, all wrapped up in a package that reminds me of the scope and range of Joyce's Ulysses. I've been laughing out loud while reading in a way that usually happens when I watch South Park.
April, I know that in general, you're critical of philosophers and brainiacs, based on your Hopscotch comments. I may be wrong, but I think you're going to find plenty to laugh at in this book too. It's atomic-mega-meta-fiction unlike anything I've come across before.
There are many voices, but the primary are:
Zampanò - who wrote The Navidson Record
Johnny Truant - who assembled the book for publication
The characters within The Navidson Record
The voices of the experts commenting on The Navidson Record
The footnotes are another level of narration:
Zampanò comments on the expert opinions
Johnny comments on the expert opinions, Zampanò's ideas, and tells lengthy, related and unrelated stories about his life, past and present
The publisher comments on Johnny's comments
BTW, I would recommend reading all the footnotes because they are very much a part of the narrative. There are some footnotes which are only long lists of names, which can be skipped, unless you're on Ritalin and have the time...
One important footnote comes in Chapter V, page 72, #78, where the publisher suggests reading Johnny's father's obituary and his mother's letters. The letters in particular are essential to understanding what Johnny is all about.
Anyway, what I'm realizing is that this is not a novel so much as a great intellectual treasure hunt through the minds of fictitious characters, authors, and academics. Enjoy!

Marc wrote: "I agree that the horror theme is really tangential to the overall thrust of the book. And while I enjoyed it, can't remember laughing out loud too often! For me the footnotes were almost the best bit."
A funny section is in chapter 15 when Karen Green is interviewing various celebrities about what they thought of the house and several of them hit on her - including Camille Paglia.
A funny section is in chapter 15 when Karen Green is interviewing various celebrities about what they thought of the house and several of them hit on her - including Camille Paglia.

Catherine wrote: "The coolest thing happened yesterday as I was teaching my College Composition class at a local community college. We were talking about authors who have influenced your writing style and the studen..."
Awesome! You scored major points with your students. What a happy bonus!
Awesome! You scored major points with your students. What a happy bonus!

That's great! Isn't it awesome when your students show real interest in your passions?
Week of:
September 24, 2012 – Intro. & Chapter I - VII, pp. 3 - 96
October 1, 2012 – Chapter VIII - X, pp. 97 - 245
October 8, 2012 – Chapter XI - XIII, pp. 246 - 346
October 15, 2012 – Chapter XIV - XXIII, pp. 347 – 528
October 22, 2012 – Conclusions/Book as a whole
(Page numbers refer to the Pantheon Books Remastered Full-Color 2nd Edition, 2000)
IMPORTANT: These discussion threads will remain open indefinitely. If you find yourself behind in the reading or if you have joined the group after the dates listed above, go ahead and read at your own pace and discuss when you want. The moderator and other members will gladly join in!
Questions, Resources, and General Banter
Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of...
Feel free to post questions and links to resources in this thread.
Also, if you’ve written a review of the book, please post a link to share with the group.