Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion
Members
>
LIST books you abandoned?

As someone who isn't into classics, I joined this group to observe and hopefully find some inspiration to really get out of my comfort zone. (Mostly it's the type of book not the fact it's old is what I don't like - I'm not into 'dramas')
It takes me a while to truly give up on a classic because of this as I really put the effort into it but I got to 35% and I fell asleep.
I fell asleep. This is the first this has ever happened to me no matter how tired I have been, I have never fallen asleep reading a book before.
And thus I confess my failure. This book was utterly boring to me and if I couldn't even keep my eyes open for it then I must go back to my motto for reading that I live by: there are so many more amazing books in the world to spend your time with than wasting it with a bad one.
Elle

It has happened to me many times. I have even tried to “continue” my reading in dreams, dreaming that I turned the pages, and by dream-logic realising that I was reading with my eyes closed.
Some one said some thing like: There are two kinds of books: Those that put me to sleep and those that keep me awake all night, and I don't know which ones I benefit most from.

It has happened to me many times. I have even tried to “continue” my reading in ..."
I'm normally quite good at putting a book down when my eyes start to shut which is probably why it has never happened to me before! Then again I'm also really good at making myself stay awake until ridiculous o'clock to finish a book! Aha.


That's exactly what happens to me pretty much every night! :)


Oh, but it's such a beautiful, redeeming story! Yes, a lot of suffering, but also a lot of beauty. But it IS a monster to get through!





Never Let Me Go
In The Kitchen
There are other books I finished that I wished I hadn't bothered to e.g. The Secret History"
I too wish I didn't bother reading The Secret History. One of the biggest disapointments.

Never Let Me Go
In The Kitchen
There are other books I finished that I wished I hadn't bothered to e.g. The Secret History"
I too wish I didn't bother reading The Secret ..."
Strange how different it can be, one of my favorite books of all time ^^


Looks like this is the first comment in a while on this topic.
I've struggled to get halfway through Labyrinth of solitude by Octavio Paz. Apparently I'm just not intellectual enough for philosophical discourse. Perhaps I will try to finish it next year.
I've struggled to get halfway through Labyrinth of solitude by Octavio Paz. Apparently I'm just not intellectual enough for philosophical discourse. Perhaps I will try to finish it next year.

I read a little bit of Finnegans Wake for giggles, but will never attempt to read it entirely. I refuse to read nonsense.

I think there is a very "good" chance of him being elected for two reasons. (1) people really dislike Hillary and (2) people want to "punish" Washington.


People do not dislike Hillary. Those who do are buying the GOP Koolaid, just parroting their talking points. She's dominating the female vote, the black vote, the Hispanic vote. Now she just has to get the dudes on board. My husband is on board.

J, what were you finding the most troubling about Grapes of Wrath? We each have our own taste of course, that's what makes these discussions so interesting! I just hadn't often heard anyone disliking that one, so I'm curious. You said the dialogue: meaning the content of conversations, or more that it's written in the local vernacular of that area and time, making it difficult to read on the page? If it's the latter, I HIGHLY recommend trying it in audio book format. I recently reread it by listening and it was amazing! It brought so much life to the characters!



What is more interesting to me in this scenario, is that the unfavorable stats are so high for BOTH candidates (personally, I hate Trump, I cringe every time Hillary says something) is this the election where something changes within the 2-party system? Is this the year we branch into 3 or more? I cannot foresee anything staying exactly as it is because there are so many on both sides so unhappy. I personally can't see voting for either of them right now.


I haven't read any Rousseau yet, but am I correct in understanding that his works are much like Dickens?

I read "A Tale of Two Cities" and "Great Expectations"- for Dickens, it is the huge descriptions that drive me up the wall. I can't read 60 word+ sentences without my brain exploding a little bit.
I do it with Tolkien too. I will skip entire pages because too much description distracts from the story. I like description, but I only need a normal sized sentence or two. I LOVE Tolkien for his world building, but that is a double edged sword to me, so I find myself skimming until the story picks up again.
Bleakness doesn't bother me as much, I guess, but it will slow my rate of reading down dramatically. Although, I do enjoy some very dark books, so I guess it depends on how entertaining the story is within the bleakness. I doubt I would attempt "Bleak House" with how badly I reacted to the others.

The descriptions get to me, too, after awhile. I'm enjoying the Anthony Trollope novel I'm in the middle of, for example, but there are definitely sections that I wish had been edited down a little more thoroughly...
Are there any Trollope novels on the List? I haven't even looked!

There have to be!

The Last Chronicle of Barset Trollope Anthony 1) core list
Phineas Finn Trollope Anthony 1) core list
Castle Richmond Trollope Anthony 2) Deleted 2008
He Knew He Was Right Trollope Anthony 2) Deleted 2008



Has anyone abandoned a Trollope novel? Because of wordiness or a different reason?

J, what were you finding the most troubling about Grapes of Wrath? We each have our own taste of course, that's what makes these discussions so interesting! I just hadn't often heard anyone disliking that one, so I'm curious. You said the dialogue: meaning the content of conversations, or more that it's written in the local vernacular of that area and time, making it difficult to read on the page? If it's the latter, I HIGHLY recommend trying it in audio book format. I recently reread it by listening and it was amazing! It brought so much life to the characters! ..."
I get where you're going with the audiobook suggestion, but I'm going to say a big NOPE to that one. The dialogue made me scream -- I do not want those voices in my head, either through reading or listening. Also, yes, boring conversations. Nope, nope, nope.
The descriptions of the dusty prairie and the turtle were all lovely though. I've read lots of Steinbeck that I did like, so I have no qualms about throwing this one in the recycling bin (my copy isn't in good condition anyway).


I haven't read any Rousseau yet, but am I correct in under..."
I'd say if you want to read Rousseau, don't bother with his fiction and just read his philosophy. The Social Contract is fairly short and readable.
Alana wrote: "Adjunct: An Undigest by Peter Manson. I gave that up after a record one page (after skimming the rest, including the last page, to see if it got better). Seriously, w..."
I felt exactly the same way. And that after all the effort it took to get hold of this book!
I felt exactly the same way. And that after all the effort it took to get hold of this book!

I felt exactly the same way. And that after all the effort it took to get hold of this book! "
I had to get mine via interlibrary loan. I guess there's a reason it's so hard to find: no one wants it!

Yeah, it's like nothing else. I did some online research on that one and learned that it doesn't have a narrative to follow. You're just supposed to let the words sort of wash over you, and then they take on a sort of meaning.
It's made up of snippets of conversation he overheard in public, along with news headlines. So it's a snap shot of society at the time. When I saw his notes online of how he wrote it, I started writing my own version. Every so often I overhear something or see a unique headline and jot it down in my own Adjunct.
Hope that helps.

Well, it helps me understand what he was going for, I guess. It doesn't make actually reading it any more appealing to me though. I'm just not into that kind of thing. I don't have to have a "perfect ending" type of story by any means, but I find it nearly impossible to read something that has literally or virtually no plot to follow. That's why I can't stand stream of consciousness like Faulkner and gave up on Ulysses after 80 pages (although that at least had SOME discernible plot).
I understand the poetry of what Manson was probably trying to reach, and I respect his efforts. Just not my reading cup of tea.

Absolutely! This takes stream of consciousness to the level of someone who is extremely distracted, every moment of the day. I was going to say "...of the level of ADHD," but I don't think someone with ADHD is even that distracted or disjointed, and not having ADHD I don't know and don't want to insult anyone. It's like reading a book by someone who changes their change of thought every sentence.



I got 80 pages in. I do want to try it again someday, but I think it was just too much heavy reading after reading a lot of other heavy books too soon beforehand.
Books mentioned in this topic
I'll Go to Bed at Noon (other topics)Andersonville (other topics)
Migrations (other topics)
The Caretaker (other topics)
Migrations (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Peter Manson (other topics)Peter Manson (other topics)
Peter Manson (other topics)
Peter Manson (other topics)
Peter Manson (other topics)
More...
It is crazy that anyone would consider voting for him to run the country.