Young Writers discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archives
>
I'm out of here! (Why this group is great)
date
newest »


I thought it was Yue or somebody that read it as "Peed with caut..."
Yes I do believe that is what happened.
((Why am I talking like that?))

I thought it was Yue or som..."
*falls off chair*


Dictionaries help a great deal in this virtual world of goodreads.

Maybe that's why this chick created the topic.
Yeah, it's a little cliquish. But we welcome everyone and if you stick around long enough, you'll become a regular member. I mean, quite a few of us have been friends for years. I'm not even a member of the original group of friends that still hang around on this group. It takes a while to get used to everything, to be honest. You'll make friends. Give it time. This group is kind of like life in an internet forum. We all have people we like more than other people in real life. It's how things work. We try not to leave anyone out. If it seems like we're being mean, it's because a lot of us LOVE to argue and we don't realize that it offends other people and if we do, we tend to ignore that because we generally aren't. (When I say we, I might just be speaking for myself, but that's what I've picked up from how people on here talk about arguing. xD) And we definitely try to welcome people into the group. We're just a little crazy and come off a bit strong sometimes.

I've only been here since 2010, so I haven't been here three years yet, but although the group was more active when I first joined, I feel like most of the amazing people are still in the group and it's about as welcoming as it was when I first joined. (People thought I was ridiculously annoying when I was a young'un. I mean, they were justified in thinking that. Because I was ridiculously annoying. But you get the point.)
message 162:
by
Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader.
(new)
I guess it's "cliquish" in the sense that many of us have been in this group for like three years and have known each other for all that time––and that there's a certain group of members who are on here quite regularly. I don't think that's intentionally shutting people out, though. As Lav said, we welcome new people. I can see how someone might think it would be hard to become "a part of the group" or whatever, but I don't really see what we can do about that. I mean, what are we supposed to do––all pretend like we don't know each other? Not check this group every day?
Also, just curious ... what was so much "better" about the group three years ago?
Also, just curious ... what was so much "better" about the group three years ago?
Brigid *Flying Kick-a-pow!* wrote: "I mean, what are we supposed to do––all pretend like we don't know each other? Not check this group every day?
"
IF I DIDN'T CHECK THE GROUP EVERYDAY I MIGHT DIE.
"
IF I DIDN'T CHECK THE GROUP EVERYDAY I MIGHT DIE.
message 164:
by
Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader.
(new)
Lav [I am glad to the brink of fear] wrote: "Brigid *Flying Kick-a-pow!* wrote: "I mean, what are we supposed to do––all pretend like we don't know each other? Not check this group every day?
"
IF I DIDN'T CHECK THE GROUP EVERYDAY I MIGHT DIE."
Exactly. O_O
"
IF I DIDN'T CHECK THE GROUP EVERYDAY I MIGHT DIE."
Exactly. O_O

Also, I think that some of the people on here might seem like a clique because they're the ones that are most active in the group. Or at least that's what it's like on the topics I'm active on. :P

I haven't been here long enough to tell. Are my friends unjustly complaining and merely want me to find other writing outlets, or....
message 167:
by
Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader.
(new)
Well, I have been here since the very beginning of this group, and I still agree with Holden––I can't think of any instances in which the mods "tore into" people or intentionally chased anyone from the group––and sorry, but I do take offense to that because it's quite an accusation. Don't get me wrong, there are a handful of people who have left the group, but they did so of their own accord. And even in that case, I can't think of any situations in which that happened, besides the ones Holden mentioned––in which a joke went wrong and a few people left because of the ensuing chaos, and one recent instance in which a member was making very racist remarks/assumptions and the mods called him out on it, and he left by his own choice––and, as Holden said, quite publicly. The group doesn't "gang up" on people, but members will call someone out on their offensive comments. And frankly, if someone makes those type of comments, they shouldn't be whining when people criticize them for it.


The discussion you are referring to is a past event which is still obviously sensitive to some members of the group, and there is no real reason to bring it up again. Additionally, if you have problems with the way the group is run, please speak with those people individually and with clear reasoning, rather than trying to incite a long-closed debate amongst the other members of the group.


Anyway yeah, expressing concern is not a problem, but expression concern in the manner you seem to be going for kind of is. If you feel you have a problem with the moderators please speak with them (us) directly and we'll talk it out.
Timothy wrote: "I'm not debating racism. I agree with most of the points made from the majority. But the thing is, I just rejoined this group after a long break, I don't know if I want to stick around if I'm at ri..."
Both myself and Annie went out of ours ways to apologise afterwards and express how we had wished it had been handled differently. He decided to continue, knowing full well how people were likely to react and, being a debate, I am not going to stop people from expressing their opinions, even if it does come off as rude or mean or like they are ganging up on others. Because debates are usually very rude and very mean. Sort of a 'nature of the beast' thing.
Both myself and Annie went out of ours ways to apologise afterwards and express how we had wished it had been handled differently. He decided to continue, knowing full well how people were likely to react and, being a debate, I am not going to stop people from expressing their opinions, even if it does come off as rude or mean or like they are ganging up on others. Because debates are usually very rude and very mean. Sort of a 'nature of the beast' thing.
(Psst Holden. Check your friend requests. Unless you don't want to be my friend... That's cool too. I guess)
message 177:
by
Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader.
(new)
Timothy wrote: "I'm not debating racism. I agree with most of the points made from the majority. But the thing is, I just rejoined this group after a long break, I don't know if I want to stick around if I'm at ri..."
Well, I think Acacia, Baxter, and Holden have pretty much covered this ... but, I still don't see that as "attacking" a member. It was just that the majority of group members disagreed with him––and he was saying offensive things, and other members called him out on it. As far as I recall, no one called him names or otherwise personally attacked him. Disagreeing with someone and calling them out for being racist or otherwise offensive is not the same as making a personal attack. So, if you make a comment that is racist/sexist/homophobic/etc. ... well yes, you can expect that members of this group will call you out on that. That's what happens when you say something controversial. Sure, debates can get harsh, and often times in this group they are rather one-sided because many members have similar viewpoints––but just because the majority disagrees with one person is not "ganging up" on him/her. I still believe that we were fair to this particular member based on how offensive some of his comments were––and also, note that he decided to leave and not that we kicked him out––but I suppose that's a bit irrelevant. The point is, as Acacia said, no one is going to attack you for no reason. If you say something rude, you'll probably be criticized. If you think that's a good enough reason to leave, that's your choice. But, we do give everyone a chance and hope that everyone can see past their political/moral/religious/whatever differences.
Well, I think Acacia, Baxter, and Holden have pretty much covered this ... but, I still don't see that as "attacking" a member. It was just that the majority of group members disagreed with him––and he was saying offensive things, and other members called him out on it. As far as I recall, no one called him names or otherwise personally attacked him. Disagreeing with someone and calling them out for being racist or otherwise offensive is not the same as making a personal attack. So, if you make a comment that is racist/sexist/homophobic/etc. ... well yes, you can expect that members of this group will call you out on that. That's what happens when you say something controversial. Sure, debates can get harsh, and often times in this group they are rather one-sided because many members have similar viewpoints––but just because the majority disagrees with one person is not "ganging up" on him/her. I still believe that we were fair to this particular member based on how offensive some of his comments were––and also, note that he decided to leave and not that we kicked him out––but I suppose that's a bit irrelevant. The point is, as Acacia said, no one is going to attack you for no reason. If you say something rude, you'll probably be criticized. If you think that's a good enough reason to leave, that's your choice. But, we do give everyone a chance and hope that everyone can see past their political/moral/religious/whatever differences.

Yes, I will admit. There was one time I was inactive for probably nine months and felt so out of the group I was going to delete myself.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
I thought it was Yue or somebody that read it as "Peed with caution" instead of "Proceed with caution".