Terminalcoffee discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Feeling Nostalgic? The archives
>
Touched for the very first time. Again.
date
newest »


I have been trying to think of scenarios where someone would need and actually use one of these, and they all make me sad!

Or first twenty times, to be honest.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world...
Now, $3 million is a good reason to hang on to that hymen!

If someone wants to have 20 kids, as long as they can afford them, whatevs. I don't think demeaning a woman by calling her vagina a clown car is very nice.

Twenty kids is ridiculous, especially at the rate the planet's resources are being consumed (primarily by greedy Americans).
Planet wrecker!
Guilty!
Because of our falling birthrate we (and every other western nation) need immigration to keep pace with mortality. One family having 20 kids doesn't hurt anything. We need her 20 kids to pay into Social Security and Medicare.

No, we don't. Let's make do with fewer people, worldwide.

Is that fair to them? It seems like a lot of responsibility.

Is that fair to them? It seems like a lot of responsibility."
I doubt it. It seems kind of exploitative, actually.
I'd much rather they adopt 20 kids.


Your example makes me think of what happened in Yosemite when they eradicated the wolves. It threw off the balance of nature to the point that a certain species of tree was lost in the aftermath. They were not sure why until they traced it all the way back to the disappearance of the wolves.
Anything done in the extreme can have undesired effects.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
You're welcome.