When You Reach Me
discussion
The Issue of Time Travel
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Michelle
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
May 06, 2012 09:58AM

reply
|
flag


As far as this story goes, I remember thinking that saving one life was a measly little task for something so stupendous as time travel. I know saving one life could have lots of repercussions but I didn't think this book explored that.
Shouldn't time travel be used to change huge events that affect lots of people? That's what I was thinking.

I can see time traveling in a forward direction but, I never could understand how it would work backwards. Probably just as well because it could lead to a lot of paradoxes. I don't think it would be adviseable for large scale events because that would unravel history and there is no telling how those events could spin out.
An example is in Star Trek when Kirk tried to get the evil Spock to change his universe. The only problem with that was this left evil Empire open to be conqured by an even worse group and then to the enslavement of humnanity.
The Power of Un was a good book on time traveling. At the end the boy is left trying to puzzle the pardox he had just created.

I think physicists have also theorized ways time travel to the past might work, but I clearly did not understand what I read well enough to explain it.
I think it has to do with multiple universes wrapped inside each other and coexisting. We can't really grasp or experience 'the reality of it' with our limited senses. Time, as we experience it, is also an illusion that we buy into because of our senses limited ability to perceive.
But don't take my word for it. I read something somewhere that did not sound so hokey.
Maybe time travel would not lead to paradox because of the idea that there may be millions of universes all existing simultaneously, with all possibilities already occurring.




I'm incredibly intrigued by this novel. If you are too, please check out my blog post about it here (http://dahlsdoll.blogspot.com/2012/05...) I have even posted a question there concerning the issue of symbolism and cycles.
I'd love to discuss this further!

I agree. Time travel was not Stead's focus. It was a means to an end.
As for cycles. Mmmmm, I'm going to have to think about that. I read your blog post, but right now, I'm trying to decide if I think a lost key or a relationship constitutes a cycle. I'm not so sure it does, though your idea that those things may be making a comment on human lives in general was intriguing.


I agree. Time travel was not Stead's focus. It was a means to an end.
As for cycles. Mmmmm, I'm going to have to think about that. I read your blog post, but right now, I'm trying to de..."
Thanks for they reply Jonathan. When reading this novel, I was intrigued by an idea that seemed to be forming throughout its pages. I found that when Miranda lost her apartment key, it didn't seem abnormal, yet it seemed to carry a significance or else Stead would not have included it in the story. Parallel to losing her apartment key, Miranda seemed to be losing her best friend. Sal was truly lost to her until they found out how they truly fit together as friends. Even Marcus seemed to fit in with this pattern of loss as he was only a temporary (although completely life-changing) fit in Miranda's life. The pattern of Miranda's cycling through friends seemed key to this novel. I couldn't help but think that Stead chose this connection to display to her readers the growth and changes that are inevitable when choosing one's friends.
I hope this makes sense.

I agree. Time travel was not Stead's focus. It was a means to an end.
As for cycles. Mmmmm, I'm going to have to think about that. I read your blog post, but right now,..."
Wow. That was really... Deep. And I'd have to agree with you. Well said.

Time-travel is a curious matter; it's interesting. But if we ever do acquire the power of time-travel, there will be chaos because time-travel do change fates and lives of people. So, if people knew about it, everything will change and when they do, there's a big percent that the differences will go wrong.
If time-travel is ever acquired, people will not be ready for it. Unless, they do smart with it.

In reply to Jonathon's comments, I think we need to think beyond the book to how Marcus' use of time travel could actually be a big thing. Yes, it is true that he only saves one life by time travelling. However, he also saves his own, but not only in the sense that he saved himself from getting hit by a semi truck. The old Marcus could have grown up miserable and sad for what he had caused. Time travel changed the course of his life in a positive way, as he gets to relive his life with a new focus. In that way, he saved his life literally and figuaratively. Being that Marcus is a genius, maybe Rebecca Stead wants us think that the life that Marcus will now lead, may change the world in ways we cannot imagine. Maybe he did use time travel for a big thing. Maybe Marcus had a dual purpose for time travel: Saving a life, so that he could also save his own and live clearly and purposefully in the next version. This kids is a genius! Can you imagine what the clear-thinking, free-of-guilt Marcus could do?
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic