Mockingjay
discussion
Worst. F**king. Ending. Ever!


Katniss was a puppet in this book. A poster child that served no purpose. Her one and only mission in the book is a complete disaster. All Katniss does is show that, outside of her image, she has nothing to offer. She FAILS. She does not accomplish anything. And she doesn't much care that she fails. What an awful message to send out to young teens. If my children were older I certainly would not let them read this book without sitting down and discussing it with them.

I kind of disagree with the message you think It portrays to young teens, I'm 16, not a young teen, but even I thoroughly expressed my disgust for the hastily, thrown together ending. I don't believe that sent any negative messages to kids.
David wrote: "Neesh_satsumaXD wrote: "im 12 and absolutely hated the ending, it was, lets put it politely, utter crap. first book was epic awesomeness, 2nd book was decent and 3rd book was CRAP! there was no emo..."
thanks :)
thanks :)
katniss goes weaker and weaker, in the first book she is this strong, angry, lethal person. then in catching fire she becomes less strong, and in mockingjay she is just annoying and lovesick.

I'm with you!!
Julie wrote: "Lindsey wrote: "I think it was a nice break from cookie cutter endings where everyone ends up happy and the girl has to make a heart-breaking decision between her two beaus. Boo-hoo."
I'm with you!!"
me too
I'm with you!!"
me too

I think it would have been.

^^read for closure.
But yes, I agree SC's ending was more realistic in settings of war and whatnot, & it definitely made me think. But I don't read these fiction books only to be left with a depressing sense of reality. I like to read them to take myself out of reality for a little bit, I read them to have some sense of satisfaction or happiness.
Yeah some people may say that this is how the ending is supposed to be, that you're not supposed to feel happy, but come on, it's not like I have the intentions of reading a book just to feel incomplete or depressed at the end. Despite the happier or at least sufficient ending I craved for, she does write a good ending that I feel is almost artistic in terms of the darker side and feel of war, love, loss, emptiness...etc.


But I don't read these fiction books only to be left with a depressing sense of reality. I like to read them to take myself out of reality for a little bit, I read them to have some sense of satisfaction or happiness.
Then stay away from these "classics" as well:
* Flowers for Algernon
* Of Mice and Men
* The Diary of Anne Frank
* The Boy in the Striped Pajamas
* Wuthering Heights
* Romeo and Juliet
* 1984
* The Old Man and the Sea
The above books (and more!) all have SERIOUSLY tragic endings. All of these books (Aside from Wuthering Heights, which has defied my attempts to stay involved) I have read and loved, and I think everyone should at least give them a try.
Books (and all art) exists to inspire you to re-contextualize and re-envision the world you live in through a lens created by someone with different experiences than yourself.

Very true. Prim's death was tragic but the epilogue fit everything. Coin couldn't become president or else nothing would change. I think that it was brilliant how Collins wrote about how Snow and Katniss shared a few words, about how they don't lie to each other. Snow knew that Katniss would kill Coin in revenge for her sister.

But I don't read these fiction books only to be left with a depressing sense of reality. I like to read them to take myself out of reality for a little bit, I read them to have som..."
Okay, well maybe I was overgeneralizing when using the word "fiction". Of course those are great classic books. I've read several fiction books that were tragic, but those were also based on a more realistic scale, with scarcely any hidden analogy to real world issues, so sad endings to me are more expected since it more closely resembles our real world (filled with tragedy of course lol). I guess I was pertaining my opinion of a satisfied ending more towards these YA, Dystopian, fantasy, fun, kind of reads, where "happy" endings are more likely to flourish in a "fake" world.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that an ending of a story can be as tragic, sad, depressing as the writer wants, which is fine with me, just as long the author doesn't leave me saying "That's it?". I don't know if that makes sense lol.
I'm not saying that I'm close minded when it comes to tragic books, and I'm not saying sad endings are necessarily bad endings. I did mention that SC's darker writing seemed artistic to me and it did make me think deeper about the themes of the book.
I just didn't like the fact that after two great books, I became attached to the characters and the ending felt like it barely touched base with, or had no emotional (whether it's good or bad) closure with the characters we came love. I felt like so many people died in the end so there wasn't enough time or I guess pages, to rightfully mourn the characters so we could move on without feeling incomplete. (small example; Rue died, depressing? yes..but at least we were able to still connect to her after she died through Katniss' thoughts about her...where as when Finnick died, it was like...awh shit, okay peace out) -___________- lol
sorry ..rambling thoughts..



he didn't tryed to get closer her cause he knew she would never forgive him for doing the weapon that killed her sister.

I didn't like that part too. I wanted them to be together.

Hahah I must admit that I also found the ending a tad bit nerve wrecking. I have always wanted Katniss and Peeta together, but I would have liked for she and Gale to remain friends. I assume that it would have been too complicated to be friends with a man that loves you while in a relationship with another. It had to be all or nothing. It would not have been fair to Petta at all because Katniss would be "having her cake and eating it too". I cried so hard when Primrose died. I was very upset with Suzanne Collins for choosing to kill Prim, but Prim was the only person that Katniss would always fight for no matter what. That is why she was the one to die. I love the last line (before the epilogue): “You love me. Real or not real?"
I tell him, "Real.” . After all of that, the first and second games, him being hijacked, killing Coin and finally being rid of Snow, she was able to tell him the truth. That she does love him and she always will.
like i said there was no emotion in the book when prim died, so i didnt cry, i know i sound heartless, i do cry at books, but only if the character themself feels pain and SC didnt really describe how katniss felt about prim dying.

Hahah I must admit that I also found the ending a tad bit nerve wrecking. I have always wanted Katniss and Peeta together, but I would have l..."
it just says that katniss was alucinating wile burning.i agree there was no emotion. i didn't cry, and don't thing this is heartless...

Then please tell me why Collins went on in grueling detail about Katniss being in and out of a catatonic state if not over the grief over Prim's death?

that was my main problem!



In that book, EVERYONE dies at the end.


Laura wrote: "Not true. The worst ending in the literary world is "the life and times of edgar sawtelle".
In that book, EVERYONE dies at the end."


Mockingjay is a good example of a dystopian novel, but out of the trilogy I prefer the Hunger Games because when I finished that novel, I still felt there was hope.

Mightymoose wrote: "Neesh_satsumaXD wrote: "like i said there was no emotion in the book when prim died, so i didnt cry, i know i sound heartless, i do cry at books, but only if the character themself feels pain and S..."
i mean katniss was in a state, but didnt have that feel, like when sirius black died,it had a lot of emotion, like harry trying to beleive he wasnt dead. and her death happened to quick, but not as quick as finnicks, but still quick.
i mean katniss was in a state, but didnt have that feel, like when sirius black died,it had a lot of emotion, like harry trying to beleive he wasnt dead. and her death happened to quick, but not as quick as finnicks, but still quick.

It was a stupid ending but i do agree with you the perfect endings get old.

This on so many levels. Prim's death resulted in Katniss realising that it wasn't over yet and opened her eyes to finish the job. Coin had to die. Katniss needed the push to make things right.
With Coin out of the picture and Prim gone, Katniss no longer has any reason to fight. She is obviously very depressed and emotionally torn to bits but this means she can close the door on her fight and slowly start to piece together some sort of new life.

This on..."
Not really it could push her into an even deeper depression. Like with the nightmare she has after the Hunger Games and everything.

Even after reading some of these posts, I still feel that Prim's death was unnecessary.
The most STUPID UNNECESSARY BALISTIC CRAPPY SH**TY DISGUSTING death of all however, was Finnick. There was NO REASON for him to die, and he was the character I got most attached to. I had the biggest crush on him, so naturally I was devastated, and actually cried when I read it.
Also, I was extremely disappointed that Gale and Katniss lived in completely different districts in the end and weren't even talking anymore. Absofrickinlutely ridiculous. They were best friends, and although Gale might have had the idea behind the attack that killed Prim, he would never intentionally kill her, and was definitely not directly responsible for her death. And Katniss should know this, and forgive him. After Finnick's death, the end of Katniss and Gale's relationship was the thing I was most frustrated about. And I was frustrated - MAD even - at A WHOLE FRICKIN LOT in this book. I was so disgusted
I read this book almost 5 months ago now, and I still haven't gotten over how disappointed and mad I am. My stomach still literally churns when I think of it.


D:

I agree with you on Prim, as frustrating as is. But Gale didn't leave just because he though Katniss wouldn't forgive him. He just couldn't live with himself after what he'd done (which it might've not even been his fault. He always tells Katniss the truth). Think about it; he's known and cared for Prim for years, so he would be pretty upset about her dying, and top of that he's got to deal with the guilt that it was probably his fault. Plus, Katniss was so depressed after her death, and although she didn't really blame him as much as Gale thought she did or should, he still couldn't live with the thought of seeing that way, and thinking that it's all his fault. He thought she would be better off without him. When you're in a first-person point of view in a book, you really have to try and get in the other characters' heads in order to understand their actions accurately, and not just assume based on your narrators thoughts.

Collins, She got lazy


Why would you click on the thread when I clearly said "Ending" the title.
i think that the deaths in the last book were a bit rushed. i liked the first one because rue's death wasnt rushed. i actually cried at it. and it takes quite a bit to get me to cry.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Mockingjay (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
The Long Walk (other topics)Mockingjay (other topics)
Lol, why thank you for educating me.