The Nexus discussion
ARCHIVES
>
Most Frequently Challenged Books of 2011

For The Hunger Games:
Violence - I get it.
Occult/Satanic - WHAT???? HOW? WHERE?
Offensive Language - WHAT?????
Insensitivity - If you are that sensitive, maybe you shouldn't have pick up that book.
Anti-family - WAS I THE ONLY ONE THAT READ ABOUT A KID THAT WAS SACRIFICING EVERYTHING FOR HER FAMILY?
Anti-ethnic - please explain this part to me, like I'm a five year old "-.-"

At the top it says they were requested to be removed from school library bookshelves which puts things in context a little bit.
Some the of reasons and justifications are hilarious though.

I haven't seen or read it but I am guessing it means that everyone in the book is white.

God, people are dim!
Okay, I can see a high school library not carrying Playboy – but these?
God I wish people would get a life, grow the Hades up, and quit worrying someone else's children might be exposed to ideas and concepts they don’t agree with.

Great thread Midu!

Makes one wonder if someone feels a bit threatened by that.
Naaa. That couldn’t be. Who could possibly feel threatened, or even unease, at that.
;)




As far as

People make my head hurt -.-' Seriously.
Also, looking at these lists only makes me want to add more of them to my to-read list :D


I've read it, it is ADORABLE, and so very, very cute and based on a true story!

I've read most of the books in the list and all I can say is they were probably challenged in communities where narrow minded, ignorant people have there own agenda about how everyone else should live. There are places in the US where they are actually rewriting and falsifying history books to be used in schools. Horrifying.

Us women are scary, scary people that make the men of this nation quiver in fear..
*cough*
Sorry. Um. Yeah. Don't know where I was going with that, but one of the uppity female characters in my head demanded I say that, and I supported her on it. :D

For The Hunger Games:
Violence - I get it.
Occult/Satanic - WHAT???? HOW? WHERE?
Offensive Language - WHAT?????
Insensitivity - If you are that sensitive, ma..."
ummm yea... she pretty much just summed up what I was thinking when I read this... WTF have they been smoking?!?! Satanic? anti ethnic? Anti family??? The whole reason she's doing what she's doing is for her family for god sakes!! Are they stupid???





I actually read an article (couldn't find it to post here, but I'll keep looking) that stated Twilight was satanic because Stephanie Meyer had dreamed up Edward, and he was really a demon who wanted her to write about him for attention...true story.





OMG... are you serious??? That's a laugh and a half ... Good lord the crap they come up with now...



That is crazy! I just had a conversation with the nicest lady, she grew up in a small village in England where there was an old school (the kind with desks that had inkwells) and I guess the town decided to rebuild, or re-do the building. Any guess as to what they did with all that old school stuff, even the extremely old books steeped in history?
They burned it. . . all. Such a shame, right? It made me physically sick to hear that. Not only am I a huge book lover, but history calls to me too.

It just goes to show how in my opinion how stupid and narrow minded some have come. I get the whole lets clean up our libraries so our children will not be exposed to literature they are not emotionally ready to handle. Which is why I agree that playboy/play girl is not fit for any school library shelf.
However, if certain members of these great States want to remove to kill a mockingbird and other in the list for reasons such as violence and whatever else they can come up with to justify their ridicules notions. Then maybe these good Christian people who obviously read the books to know its content show also ban the Bible!
Yes I said it! I know I am not the perfect example of how to live one’s life according to laws of God. But come on… if you are going to ban books because of violence, sexuality and racism; the Bible should have been at the top of list.
Sorry for the mini-rant and again my apologies to anyone I might have offended. It was not my intentions, it was a point. A point that I hope everyone will understand.
My daughters have read most of the books on this list and many more. In all honesty we read them together. Lord, what does that say about my parenting skills…. Let me tell you! My youngest daughter read the book Beautiful Disasters by Jamie McGuire. Macy is only 12 and it’s clearly out of her age range. However, all her friends were reading it. Does it make e wrong for letting her read it??? NO! And you know why??? It allowed me to open up to her and explain her that not every girl in Abby’s situation gets a happy ending. It allowed us to talk about the different signs of an abusive boyfriend/ partners are and the steps she can take to protect herself. On a side note, I am not a complete idiot; I didn’t let her read the sexual contents we skipped over that. She is after all only 12!
In other words books of FICTION can be great teaching tools. It allows the young to learn without giving too much power to the past and it can also be a great escape from reality.
I have rambled so much I forgot my point!!! So I will just say…. the list is garbage and for me to continue feeding it gives it velocity which I think it doesn’t deserve!

http://www.twilightgear.net/twilight-...

Nice to see some of the classics still holding up somewhat in the outraging people department.
Heck, sometimes I think if an author isn't ticking at least one person off, maybe they aren't doing their job. ;)

Lol! That's what I say about parenting...if my kids like me all the time, I'm not doing a good job :)


That is crazy! I just had a conversation with the n..."
Julie, I don't see how your reply has anything to do with what I said. Do you think I'm picking on small towns? I am not. There are many I love and I happen to write novels about a rural place I love very much.
But the article at this link happens to be based on facts.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/edu...

If the only things we (or our kids) were allowed to read were those books that were so bland that no one found them offensive, I believe we'd end up with only one:


I can't comment on the others, but as far as Mocking Bird goes, I think it should remain a required part of the curriculum, especially at that early an age. It is about racism. Its purpose is to educate people on the evils of racism. While an ugly truth, our history, and even our present, is filled with acts of violence and hatred based on race alone. To try and ignore or erase that past, only increases the odds that we will continue to repeat our mistakes. Educating our kids, teaching them to embrace our differences or at least respect them, is by far, the more logical course.

I'm 44, a parent and a university English instructor. I'm probably also the only person on Earth who hasn't read The Hunger Games.
Seeing books on a list like this one makes me want to go right out and read them! And I'm sure most teenagers feel that way as well. When I was a kid, the big one that we secretly passed around was


I'm 44, a parent and a university English instructor. I'm probably also the only person on Earth who hasn't read The Hunger Games.
Seeing books on a list l..."
Lol. I remember that brewhaha, too!

It just goes to show how in my opinion how stupid and narrow minded some have come. I get the whole lets clean up our libra..."
I can agree with your arguments, but where did the article even mention "Christians"? Just because someone wants to censor a book does not automatically mean "Christian". Sorry for my mini rant, but I am a Christian and it offends me for bias because of that.

For The Hunger Games:
Violence - I get it.
Occult/Satanic - WHAT???? HOW? WHERE?
Offensive Language - WHAT?????
Insensitivity - If you are that sensitive, ma..."
I agree with you on the Hunger Games. This was far from being Satanic/Occultic, anti-family, and everything else. Anti-ethinic? What is that supposed to mean?

But the article at this link happens to be based on facts.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/edu...
..."
Nope, wasn't disagreeing or saying that it wasn't a fact, I was simply saying that rewriting history was crazy, in other words, horrific. . . like you said. A simple misunderstanding, I think. I was in no way implying that you were picking on small towns, I was reminded of a conversation I had the other day and stated it. I'm sorry that you took it as me ridiculing your statement.

Thanks so much for clarifying that, Julie. I really like this group and certainly don't want any bad feelings going around. Now I understand what you meant.

http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/...

In response to some of the other comments:
No, we are not allowed to publicly discuss the changes a female goes through, unless it is done in the most vague way possible. Heaven forbid!
No, this kind of idiotic, blind censorship is not limited to Christians. Although, I have seen more Christians behave this way. But I consider them to be the extremists and not an accurate representation of an entire faith. I also think you see more Christian extremists in the news because the media is somewhat prejudiced against Christianity. But that's a conversation for another day.
The bottom line is, people these days love to put their blinders on and pretend that their reality is perfect and anything that intrudes on that fake perfection must be challenged and removed. It's the, "If I can't see it, it isn't there," mentality. It is easier to blame books, movies, and video games for the way kids turn out, than to look at ourselves as a community of parents and say, "Okay, maybe we f@*ked up."


Nice to see some of the classics still holding up ..."
Here, here!

Really?
They are my favourite books ever. Absolutely amazing."


Lol!
heather wrote: "mine 2 i saw the movie saturday it was awesome but i pictured it more bloody and volient oh well still awesome lol :)!"
I thought that the movie was much tamer as well. I was glad, though, since I didn't want to wade through the gore to get to the plot.

It just goes to show how in my opinion how stupid and narrow minded some have come. I get the whole lets cle..."
Sorry! Like I said… I didn’t mean to offend anyone…. I guess I chose Christians to pick on because I am from what they call a Bible belt town. Anytime something remotely enjoyable happens the woman of the church ban together with their pitch forks and Godly Southern Values and demand their husbands start laying hand on the heathens and…… Oh man I know I did it again…. So I suck at apologizing and now owe you an apology for apologizing.
I get it…. I do… I believe there is a God, and that Jesus died for our sins… I am also a realist… The numbers don’t lie…. Not many will make it to heaven the road is but too narrow.

I'd just like to quote Billy Joel and say:
I'd rather laugh with the sinners
than cry with the saints.
The sinners have much more fun.
Cheers. I'm new in this group but I get the feeling we are all intelligent enough to accept and appreciate one another.

As for rants - Rant on my friend!
I have heard the story of the dream Myers had that inspired Edward. I am not surprised that some have made the demon conclusion. If you want to peek into the mind of pure evil, check out Chick Cartoons ( http://www.chick.com/ - Be warned - these arsehats give me the screaming willies and demonstrate the worst of my Christian brethren). Its just the kind of thing these dimwits would come up with.
Nawnee – be parents? Are you kidding? Besides they already make sure their little ones conform (just look at how well behaved the preachers kids usually are. Sweet and kind, and they would never drink or smoke or have sex! Mwahahahah[Chough]! I kill me). No they are concerned that you are not raising your kids right!
Lanie - “I also think you see more Christian extremists in the news because the media is somewhat prejudiced against Christianity.”
AMEN!
On Christian Censorship:
While I too tire of the constant barrage of “Christians Bad”, but in the case of censorship I have to say it does tend to be the far right evangelical Christians tossing the books onto the pyre.
I don’t like it, I wish it were not true – but so far I haven't seen a Druid Book Burnings. Now there is “Burning Man” – which looks like a Hades of a good time right up to that creepy little symbolic substitution immolation (which also gives me the screaming willies) – but I think that's less Druid and more drunken bohemians blowing off some steam.
Now I am sure some other major religions do have their bibliophobes, I know Islam has its share and I think I recall some Hindu shenanigans; but I have no examples to give.
In my brethren defense they actually think they are doing the right thing, protecting people and saving their souls. They are wrong, suppressing knowledge is never a good. Historically when such suppressions of knowledge are successful it tends to predicate the fall of civilization.
As for the Bible, its kind of important as it is one of the foundations of modern civilization and modern literature – but it sure is filled with nasty bits like slavery, genocide, incest, murder, treachery, and general mischief. One would think it would be near the top of books too nasty to expose our children too – but there you go.
Be well my friends.
Books mentioned in this topic
Forever... (other topics)One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue Fish (other topics)
Brave New World (other topics)
Catching Fire (other topics)
The Hunger Games (other topics)
More...
1)
Reasons: Offensive language; religious viewpoint; sexually explicit; unsuited to age group
2)
Reasons: Nudity; sex education; sexually explicit; unsuited to age group
3)
Reasons: Anti-ethnic; anti-family; insensitivity; offensive language; occult/satanic; violence
4)
Reasons: Nudity; sex education; sexually explicit; unsuited to age group
5)
Reasons: Offensive language; racism; religious viewpoint; sexually explicit; unsuited to age group
6)
Reasons: Nudity; offensive language; religious viewpoint
7)
Reasons: Insensitivity; nudity; racism; religious viewpoint; sexually explicit
8)
Reasons: Nudity; offensive language; sexually explicit
9)
Reasons: Drugs; offensive language; sexually explicit
10)
Reasons: Offensive language; racism
The website also mentions:
Top ten most frequently challenged books of 2009
10 Most Frequently Challenged Library Books of 2010
The only book that I've read on this list is