Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

This topic is about
Vergeef mij de liefde
Archived
>
Page number wildly differs from actual pages
date
newest »



The main thing that stinks about this though, is when reading it and updating your page status, you need to look at the page you are on, and remember to add the number of opening pages to that in order for a real status page number to be reflected.
It would be nice if Goodreads had a field that you can list the opening non-story page numbers in, and then the actual page numbers of the content, so that people would see them separate and the status updates would be accurate if you just put in the page number you are on.

Kim wrote: "It should be the actual numbers of pages"
I disagree. The page count should agree with that of the last counted page (if it has a number).
We did this in the past with a book that ran from page 400-965 (or something like that). Users should not have to do arithmetic to find out what page they are on for status updates.
I disagree. The page count should agree with that of the last counted page (if it has a number).
We did this in the past with a book that ran from page 400-965 (or something like that). Users should not have to do arithmetic to find out what page they are on for status updates.
So, I added them, but then I remembered that the page numbers (the actual numbers on the pages) differ wildly from the actual number of physical pages, because, at one point the author decides something like "lots of stuff happened in the last 200 pages, but they weren't very interesting, so I left them out", but page count goes up by 200 anyway. So the last page in this book says page 900 something, whereas, in reality, there are only 700 something pages. I'm gonna be vague about these numbers, because the book is downstairs and I can't be bothered to actually go and get it. No matter.
So basically, what I'm asking is, should I enter the number of actual pages or the number that the (fake) page numbers indicate?