Addicted to YA discussion

This topic is about
Mockingjay
Series
>
Mockingjay
message 1:
by
Erika, Dream Thief
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Feb 14, 2012 01:59PM

reply
|
flag
I hated this book the first time I read it, I was really annoyed at Suzanne Collins, but rereading it now it is my favorite of the series. I don't know why, maybe I just have fresh eyes this time and can understand it more. It's absolutely amazing this time around.


The first time I read it, I HATED it. Once I was done, I literally threw it down in disgust. The normally strong and independent Katniss had been turned into a weak, lovesick person. Peeta was nothing like his original self, and his continuous attempted betrayals became old. Gale and Katniss's relationship was completely ruined, and Haymitch hardly appeared.
Also, Suzanne Collins began needlessly killing people I liked left and right, and I hated the way it was a "happily ever after" ending.
Then I read it the second time.
And you know what? It wasn't actually that bad. Why? Because I had my expectations set too high the first time. I expected a book as good as the original one was, so I was severely disappointed when the book didn't come near to that caliber. So, I threw those expectations away, and came away with a pretty good story and a good overall experience.
Although this book isn't as good as the first two, it has its own merits that, in some ways, make it better than the two books that came before it.
a lot of people have been complaining about this book and the ending but i have to say that i really liked it. I thought it was a good ending. It was imperfect just like the world that Collins created.
I agree with you Jack, i think a lot of people didn't like it cause it didn't live up to the expectation they had of it.
I agree with you Jack, i think a lot of people didn't like it cause it didn't live up to the expectation they had of it.

***Mild Spoilers***Peeta who I adore was reduced to such a different character and I felt Katniss was turned into something other then I expected of her. While I don't hate it I cannot say it was as good as the first book.

I just read above and don't want you to feel that you shouldn't read this one, you should. It is good, there is just this final "but"...


and also most of it was planning the rebellion, not actually carrying it out
:(



and also most of it was planning the rebellion, not actually carryi..."
I was thinking the same thing! The Games are sooo interesting, and there's really nothing about them in the last one...I guess I can understand, though. It must've been hard enough coming up with a reason to send Katniss into the arena a second time, let alone a third.


I dunno, maybe I'm the only one that feels this way. But yeah, I loved the ending.

The first time I read it, I HATED it. Once I was done, I literally threw it down in disgust. The norma..."
I agree with you when you say that it was disappointing because of your expectations. I was late to the whole HG series. I only read the first one shortly after Mockingjay was released. After reading and enjoying the Hunger Games in one sitting (11 hours!) I read Catching Fire just a few days later. Towards the end of CF i realized that the story was going to become darker. And so when I eventually read Mockingjay, I was unsurprised and felt that Katniss's story had come to a logical end. For me Mockingjay was great.

Nope you're not the only one who feel that way. Couldn't have said it better myself! :)

The first time I read it, I HATED it. Once I was done, I literally threw it down in disgust. The norma..."
I completely agree with you!
At first I did not like Mockingjay AT ALL. Then I reread it a few times and I liked it better. I still think HG and CF were better but after rereading it and thinking about it, I like Mockingjay. Although I really wish Prim survived.



I DISAGREE! no offence but in my opinion you are completely wrong! this one was actually pretty good. except for what happened to Petta! :("
I disagree with this statement.
I think this was the worst of the trilogy. It felt rushed, and the characters weren't the same.

and also most of it was planning the rebellion, not actually carryi..."
I have to agree with you! :) Its the lack of the games! - Oh well I liked it! It wasn't as good as the previous ones but it wasn't bad either

But it was right. It really was. For all the excitement, we too easily forget that this is a dystopian novel about a world gone very wrong. I think that in wishing for more blood, more games, but still a pretty little bow tying everything up at the end that we become more like the world in the books than we would care to admit.
The world in HG is broken. There are real, immediate prices to be paid. Collins works hard to keep the world of Panem and its inner workings realistic and plausible, because it is that very realism and plausibility that make the stories both horrifying and fascinating. Even in the slightly neater revolutions that have taken place in history (American Rev., French Rev., etc.), a victory does not equal peace. There are still feuds and concessions and bad blood. The districts of Panem have nearly a century of history and bad blood to deal with, and we expected Katniss and Peeta to say a few pretty words, shoot a figurehead baddie, and fix everything magically?
Tying up everything would have been a cop-out. Collins did what made sense.




"Finnick?" katniss says. "Maybe some pants?'
He looks down at his legs as if noticing his outfit for the first time. then he whips of the hospital gown, leaving him in just his underwear. "why? Donyou find this"-- he strikes a ridiculously provocative pose-- "distracting?" p.79


I thoroughly enjoyed Hunger Games and thought Catching Fire was a good sequel, but I really didn't care for this one. Sure, there were some exciting scenes and clever twists, but I found much of the writing tedious and was eager for the story to end. I thought it was over the top, reminding me of a Hollywood summer blockbuster. The ending was particularly disappointing. Collins handled the love triangle so brilliantly throughout the series, and then it just fizzles.
In my opinion, the first two volumes worked well because Collins balanced the frightening material with humor, romance, and a sense of hopefulness and triumph over dark forces. For me, she failed to achieve this balance in Mockingjay, leaving the reader with only bleak despair.

I thoroughly enjoyed Hunger Games and thought Catching Fire was a good sequel, but I really didn't care for this one. Sure, there were some exciting scene..."
I disagree. Well, I disagree now. I thought the same thing when I first finished the book. I was ticked off at how it ended, how dark it was. Then I really started thinking about it.
My full explanation is here: http://shelversanon.blogspot.com/2012... but basically, I think Collins chose the best possible scenario that still fit the world she had created. The proper feel and consequences were there. And there was still hope, despite it all.



Nah. I already had the niggling feeling that Collins had made the right choice even as I was throwing books around. What do you feel is incorrect or less than convincing?


Like I said I'm torn but I think I'm leaning towards the negative side personally.

So... I was ready to see what happens to Katniss and Peeta then when it ended I was like :o. So yeah I didnt like the endinng though.
I hated this book. Sorry but I really do. I enjoyed The Hunger Games, thought Catching Fire was OK but I HATED this one. The ending. It may sound slightly drastic but I will never read the series again, nor see the movies for the second two book. I went from liking and admiring Katniss as a character to hating and despising her. when she said yes to the Hunger Games, I very nearly threw the book on the floor and refused to read the end. I wish I had. It just got worse.