Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Page Numbering Requests
>
Audiobook hours rounded up = page numbers?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lavinia
(last edited Feb 08, 2012 06:57PM)
(new)
Feb 08, 2012 06:57PM

reply
|
flag


In my eyes it is extremely irritating, when a book site for an audio book is stating "15 pages".
In fact until now I always thought this is an import error and had removed this field.
I think this formatting does not help a user. They do not know anything about this rule and are irritated like me.
I suppose to:
- Either left this page field clean for audio books and state the length of a book in the edition field instead. This makes sense, because many books have editions of various lengths (abridged/unabridged) and can be seen right from the edition selection.
- Or the devs can change the formatting. But honestly, I don't think this will happen, so the first option makes the most sense to me.

I listen to a lot of audiobooks and often keep track of how far in hours I am into the book by status. Confusing as it might be, it would render the page/percentage status completely useless for audiobooks. Which, personally, I would find more irritating.


At any rate I suspect that since this has been policy for so long it us unlikely to change.
Daniel wrote: "In fact until now I always thought this is an import error and had removed this field."
I am in the process of reverting these edits.
It is expected that all active librarians will be familiar with the manual. Failure to follow current policy can be cause for revocation of librarian status.
(That is, once you realized you had made a mistake, you should have reverted your incorrect edits. Then starting a discussion regarding policy might be appropriate.)
The decision to add "page numbers" for audiobooks was based on requests from many audiobook listeners. It has been policy for several years, and is unlikely to change any time soon. If you do not find those "pages" useful, the percentage read option is always available. But many other audiobook readers do find them useful.
I am in the process of reverting these edits.
It is expected that all active librarians will be familiar with the manual. Failure to follow current policy can be cause for revocation of librarian status.
(That is, once you realized you had made a mistake, you should have reverted your incorrect edits. Then starting a discussion regarding policy might be appropriate.)
The decision to add "page numbers" for audiobooks was based on requests from many audiobook listeners. It has been policy for several years, and is unlikely to change any time soon. If you do not find those "pages" useful, the percentage read option is always available. But many other audiobook readers do find them useful.



Besides, the page number can vary considerably even in different papery or ebook editions, so it would be kind of tricky to decide where to get the information in any other form than as the number of hours in the book, which the publishers often provide.


Yep, that's why I would consider a dedicated field for hours or minutes.

That would be nice, but which page numbers do we add? There will be librarians changing back and forth. You may look into one of the topics about it in the feedback group and bump it. It must have been suggested or commented on.

I always add the number of CD's/Cassettes and running time at the bottom of the description on all of the media I personally own so if or when the rule does change, the information is already there for the next librarian. It also helps identify the media.
I was filling it in incorrectly, myself, till another librarian contacted me!
I sent goodreads a suggestion to add a toolbar bubble next to the "Number of Pages" field.
The most important thing is, that we're all doing it the same way!!!

In my eyes it is extremely irritating, when a book site for an audio book is stating "15 pages".
In fact until now I always thought this is an import erro..."
That's a very good point Daniel!! The main purpose for this site is for the mass members, not the librarians! The masses are not going to read those rules.

Vicky, wouldn't the number of disks do the same for you? I agree leaving it blank is a problem for you and that's understandable.
The main problem I see is we're all looking at this from a librarians point of view and not the normal user's point of view. We should be making it work for those who are not librarians and they have no idea what that number means when it's an audiobook.
Mike wrote: "The main problem I see is we're all looking at this from a librarians point of view and not the normal user's point of view."
Actually, this practice was originally determined based on a poll of what was at the time the largest Goodreads group of audiobook readers. Most of whom were not librarians.
Actually, this practice was originally determined based on a poll of what was at the time the largest Goodreads group of audiobook readers. Most of whom were not librarians.

Not Vicky, but your thought assumes that the person is listening to the audiobook on one format - CD.
Scenario:
I am listening on a download, and my friend A is using the CDs. B wants to join in reading with us, but on cassette. Time allows us to say where we have got to without confusion - the third hour is the third hour on all formats, but CD3 may not match up to Cassette3, and is completely untranslatable into Download.
By all means, ask for an Extra field, but I can see why audiobook groups would prefer to have a cross-platform(ish) method for discussion.