The Stand
discussion
King - can he write decent endings?
date
newest »



He doesn't seem to have done too badly, though!

The reason, I think, why one contributor considered the end to The Stand as horrible is simply due to the length, (and weight) of the book. Its ending, a deux et machine, simply does not "pay off."
Some of his best endings are w/ the "Bachman Books:" The Running Man, The Long Walk,, etc.
And, I particularly enjoyed The Dead Zone.
Good reading, all.
—R


Yes, it's a "neat" finish. It ties up the loose ends. It brings closure and completion of the character arcs. But that's the problem - it is a little too neat. After the magnificent build-up of tension over several hundred pages, we get a deux ex machina ending that feels a little rushed and tacked on.

I am in agreement w/ many here about the end to The Stand. And, there are other novels and stories in which the endings don't appear to satisfy the exposition and build.
But he also has many endings which are incisive and thought-provoking.
And so . . .



Pickle wrote: "The books ive read of his with weak endings are IT, Under the Dome and The Stand.
Under the Dome and The Stands were particularly weak after such a great and lengthy read, i thoughts IT's was just..."


In my opinion, a book (unless it's part of a series and not the final book,) doesn't have to resolve everything but there should be a sense of closure. I thought The Stand did a great job of that, despite the twist at the end (which I loved.) I enjoy many of the twists Steven King ends his stories with. The Dark Tower series was an exception to this, and I haven't read any of his newer stories since.
So basically... yes and no.


all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Needful Things (other topics)
Under the Dome (other topics)
A Game of Thrones (other topics)
It (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
Rose Madder (other topics)Needful Things (other topics)
Under the Dome (other topics)
A Game of Thrones (other topics)
It (other topics)
More...
I say 'can be'. They are. Mostly.
I won't list every single King book I've read, but let it be known that I've read a few, and most of the time I find myself let down by the endings. I don't bitch about it because, hey, at the end of the day it's just a book, it's not real life, and I can move on to another book pretty quickly. But sometimes I think it's good to vent about these things, so I'll pick two with endings I dislike.
1. Needful Things
Now, this isn't so much the ending as the climax before the ending. The actual ending (with the repetition of the opening chapter) was really cool, but the bit just before that... Well, let's just say it ain't great. As someone said earlier, it's not so much that it's a bad ending (the book verges of the ridiculous - in a good way! - every now an again, so (view spoiler)[ a car turning into a winged chariot and flying off into the sky (hide spoiler)] isn't exactly bad), but it's 'sucky'.
In this instance, I prefer the movie's ending where (view spoiler)[ Gaunt talks to the main character in his sinister way and wanders off (hide spoiler)]. For me, the subtlety works, but I don't know if it could have worked for the book.
2. Under the Dome
I will be honest and say that I'm not the biggest fan of this book. There are some amazing scenes, and there are some excellent characters, but I just didn't love it. And the ending has a lot to do with that.
My issue with it is that throughout the book a lot of people die. I have no issue with this. In fact, I think it's a good thing. It's like in A Game of Thrones et al., where you have no idea if your favourite character is going to survive or die a terrible, terrible death (view spoiler)[(unless your favourite character is Barbie or Julia; I don't think anyone expected them to kick the bucket, but that's an issue for another discussion) (hide spoiler)].
The ending, therefore, does not fit. (view spoiler)[ Yeah, people die, including little kids, but that ending - that bloody ending! I could practically hear the uplifting music as Julia's dog barked happily and bounded towards his owner.
No one should have survived. Except, perhaps, Ollie Dinsmore. He fought for and earned survival. Overall, though, I think everyone should have died. Julia should have tried to reason with the one alien, and just as it was about to assent, the other aliens should have come in and stopped it. Then, of course, death.
If there were some way to let Ollie live, then do it. (hide spoiler)]
I don't, however, think every single one of King's endings has been bad. There are a few, but mostly they work and I like them.
I know a lot of people hate the ending to (and the last quarter of) It. For me, though, the ending works. (view spoiler)[The book isn't exactly cheerful, so why have a happy ending? They all forgot their childhood, except Mike, so it makes sense for them to forget it again. It's awful to read, especially when you hear that Bill almost remembers his friends, but there would be no way to move on in their lives without forgetting it. It has to be so, and, I think, it works. (hide spoiler)]
I suppose that's all I've got to say on the subject. Thanks for reading, if anybody did :D
P.S. Sorry for all the spoiler tags, but there will be some people out there who would yell at me if I didn't have them, so enjoy the clicking!