What about Intro?

[G. A.]

The intro is long enough where it might be most helpful to go intro & chap 1 together? Or perhaps treat the intro separate? What do y'all think.

[Robert]

:( Still waiting for Amazon to deliver my book. But dont worry I will catch up.

[G. A.]

Junior wrote: "Chapter 1 is the Introduction."

Nice call Junior! I guess I should have looked at the book before commenting.

[Bob]

yea Chapter 1 and 2 = Intro and first regular chapter.

Speaking of the Intro... What do you think? Makes me more excited to jump in. I like what he's doing and I love how he traces the intertextuality ties between OT and later OT, and OT and NT. And he does this from an evangelical perspective.

[G. A.]

I've become more and more of an OT sort of guy in the last couple of years, so I am going to appreciate his approach here...quick question though, am I right when I am thinking Beale is an amil guy?

[Bob]

I'll have to check his Rev. commentary in case he gives out that info. I'd think he could be historic premil or amil, either one....

[Bob]

Okay, he definitely is amil. Although he prefers the designation "inaugurated millennialism".