SciFi and Fantasy eBook Club discussion
Member Chat
>
What makes someone add a new friend?
date
newest »


I'm not sure why I'd want 1000s of Goodreads friends. There would be too much noise to actually hear what people are saying. Or am I missing something?

I'm sure not trying to get 1000s of friends. But you know, a few dozen would be fine. It seems like a lot of people only log on once in a while, so, it wouldn't be too much of flood (??).
Also I mostly ask people who have read the kind of fantasy that I like too. Why yo'd friend someone with totally different tastes is kind of weird lol.

I feel that if someone has bothered to either read a comment of mine or to look at my books/reviews and then ask to Friend, it would be rude not to accept! Friend me if you like! ;-)
I like to see what other people are reading or what they have to say about books but agree, 1000s of friends will just be a distraction.


I don't get why anyone would take on an attitude. I suppose they see themselves as exclusive, but there's lots of great people here you just haven't met yet.
Let the 'snoots' poke their noses up. More friends for the rest of us.
(Yeah, I know. That doesn't make any sense)

My Goodreads experiences have been really positive and to me this is the only social site that I feel has any real merit or value. I have real conversations here and get real insights. Not just a bunch of jerks trying to have the funniest, ill mannered, post of the day.

I've seen some people on goodreads I'd like to friend, but I haven't been on here for long so I'm guessing they'd think "who is this person?" and reject the friend. So I'd rather not friend anyone out of the blue, unless we start chatting in groups we're in together. But if someone wants to friend me, I'll check them out and usually friend.

Primarily look for people who have rated some of my favorite books very high and tend to read some of the same authors/series that I do. I'm always interested in recommendations for books I haven't read and if someone seems to have similar reading preferences it works better.
And it's difficult to have much of a conversation if the books you like the most they've said they couldn't finish ... and their favorites are, for the most part, books I couldn't finish.



I wouldn't mind more, but I think more than 10 active friends would probably be more than I need.
I talk books all the time with my students, and Goodreads gives me that missing element -- connecting with people who are not saying, "That book looks awfully thick, Miss."
Elldee
Elldee, just remember, if you love it, longer is better. (Books, I mean.) (Well, lots of stuff, but books too.)

Good metaphor for life.
Yes, a good book leaves a person wishing it could continue. So I just laugh at my students and tell them I only choose good books.
Elldee





I'm like you. I find updating my book list is like organizing my iTunes. I can only do so much and then my brain wanders off to parts unknown.

I am finding that I am beginning to place more books in my who cares stack! They will make it on GR as I move along or re-read them.

So true and I have a lot of books that I am looking forward to rereading.

I'll become a fan of an author I like and perhaps follow reviews of those who I think are helpfully critical (not outright slating but are happy to say if somethings not quite right.)
I also accept the odd friend request from people who have asked. Sometimes it's nice to be asked.


I accept requests from people in those two categories, as well as folks who ask nicely, seem to have similar book interests, or answer my challenge question (What book would you recommend that I read) with something that I would actually like. I do not accept requests from authors who try to use that to flog their own wares.


You know what is really cool? When I friend my favourite authors and they accept!

I had that same experience. At first I hadn't realized I pressed the 'Friend' and not 'Fan' button, but they accepted. That's cool!

But after getting a couple random requests, and accepting them without being "snooty", I decided that widening your circle of influence is never a bad thing. Especially on a site that is devoted to sharing thoughts on books and perhaps opening your eyes to some which you might not have found out about otherwise.
And I have to agree, even if you don't necessarily interact with them, it's still kinda "neat"to have some of your favorite authors as friends lol.


I agree, the number of my books greatly exceeded the number of my friends. Then I decided that books were my friends and things evened out a little.
message 33:
by
The FountainPenDiva, Old school geek chick and lover of teddy bears
(new)


I don't have many friends (violin strings if you please) although I talk to lots of people and most of my gang of 20 approached me. I'll add anyone who wants to be my friend because they have gone to the effort and at the end of the day as long as I don't have to buy them all a pint where's the harm.

I don't say this because I feel 'friending' me is some kind of elite status, but I like to know there's a basis of similar interests.
So, I guess that's as good a reason as any.

I tend to "friend" people on GR that I have had several discussions with, usually where I agree with their views, but I have added people who have the same taste in books as me, especially when their list includes lots of books I am looking to read in future.
As an author I can see advantages to having a lot of "friends" on your list so that more people here about book releases etc., but I suspect you would need a very large number for it to make any difference at all? I've never set out to do that.
I don't think I know anyone on Facebook (none of my RL friends use it) and very few on Twitter.

On GR, I interract with people I know from Twitter, FB... but it's also folks with similar interests or review styles. I don't always accept all requests, either, if I'm not sure there's common ground, but it is nice to build a group of people with similar interests.
And Paul, I have not set out to do that with my author persona, either... though many of my friends are authors as well :) First and foremost, I'm a reader, and I think I've only just begun to scratch the surface of what this site offers, so having those friends really helps.

That's quite sneaky and probably accurate, but it wouldn't explain why I had a spate of requests from spiritualists and palm readers, both on here and twitter. I haven't read any spiritual books. Perhaps it's my cheesy grinning profile pic.

I will follow authors or reviewers whose reviews, posts and updates I find interesting. When fan and follow were separate, I always followed an author I fanned.
One reason some members like lots of friends - odd competitions for # whatever reviewer (having plenty of friends to see and like your reviews gets you into those stats) and to gain followers for their book review or other blogs off goodreads. Liked review here is like "helpful" at amazon and moves most popular to top of pile, which gets it more viewings and likings...I think we are all familiar with that tactic.
If you like someone's reviews (particularly if read same books), you can follow them to add their reviews and status updates to your update feed without friending.
If I find in discussions or reviews that I have a lot of reading tastes in common with someone, I compare books. Usually at least follow. If eerily close tastes, I friend because I want their reviews up top right underneath the book on the book page. If our reading tastes so close we might have been separated at birth, I will edit friend list to make them "top friend" right up with my real life friends.
I friend if I keep running across them all over goodreads and we have fun discussions.
I used to accept all friend requests and then just unfriend if they turned out to be a spammer or just endlessly flooded my update feed with stuff I did not want where I could not get to see posts from other friends. Never care how long someone has been on goodreads. Do prefer groups or books in common.

Shame on amazon for handling a few bad apples by preventing author reviews and some types of author participation with their reading community. I'm pretty used to seeing some big name author endorsement on book jackets and quoted reviews or comments in printed book descriptions anyway so never thought anything about it one way or another that authors could write reviews on amazon.
Shame on the few bad apples, sock puppets, trolls, desperately spamming, annoying authors spoiling the online communities for the rest of us.
When I joined Goodreads I added people to my friends list because I know them from Twitter. We already have a connection. I've also found a couple of authors I like and friended them.
Outside of people you know from Facebook or Twitter what's your decision process for making someone a 'friend' on Goodreads?