Authors Lounge discussion
The Lounge
>
How many pages makes a book?
date
newest »


The page count does not change the book itself.
I hate books that are filled with filler. The page number shouldn't matter when writing.

And especially with epublishing, length mostly matters so that readers have a sense of pacing and award committees know which category you fit in. Novel-length starts at about 40k-50k words, but only Middle Grade and short romances (from trad. publishers) tend to be that long. 90k words is pretty standard for genre fiction because the bound paperback hits the sweet spot for shelf space consumption. Yes, standard modern lengths were arrived at for bookstore shelf space reasons.
I believe 150 (YA/TWEEN/Children and up. People have very short attention spans today, so I personally would not go over 300. Best wishes to you.

Seriously though, it takes as many pages as it takes to get to the end.

Seriously though, it takes as many pages as it takes to get to the end."
That's how I see it, too. I think it's interesting how so many things have changed from the traditional rules of book format now that e-readers are becoming the main platform.


When we write, I think we worry about making the work conform more than we worry about making the story work. My first book, I just wrote until the story was done. On my second book, I've spent more time worrying about the word count than the story. I've tried to get away from that so that I can concentrate on what the story is saying rather than how long it takes to tell it.

In any case, back on topic, check out http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-...

I have to agree with you. We are seeing the beginnings of a transition from paper to digital. There were four big name bookstores in my town and today all of them are gone. The days of wandering through a bookstore, hanging out while browsing magazines are gone.
I don't think paper books will disappear, but the move from paper to digital will not reverse. It's the same as 8-track to cassette tape to CD and now to data stick.
It'll, in time, over take paper and with e-book readers being priced lower with more features more people will adopt it.

We could form a writers 'meet up'. All of us could get together and hang out at a book store, then... oh wait.


It does make a difference obviously more words, more pages all means more cost for the book. The digital age does make that less of an issue because making an ebook is the same process whether it is 5 words or 50,000 words.
The biggest difference is the editing. The longer the book the higher cost of having it properly edited.

That's really interesting. I'm more inclined to buy a bigger book because I can immerse myself in that world for a long time.
Writers like Tom Clancy and Stephen King are good at creating longer books.






Page counts are determined by how the words are formatted and printed out. eBooks' page counts vary depending upon the font size displayed, etc. Also, because so many submissions are now sent through email (and because it is independent of how the book will be formatted and if it will be printed), word count has become the industry standard for book length.


Amazing point! That's why experts are needed, I guess.


Well said.

So very true! I agree completely.

Very true - this morning...
I'm not sure we can rely on this stabilizing at some point. eBooks are a disruptive technology. They tend to undermine the best laid plans of mice and major publishing houses.
When I see an eBook for sale at 160% the price of the corresponding paperback, I don't buy the paperback, I buy from some other author - in eBook format. Pricing from the big six is driving customers to eBooks, just not their eBooks. The reported numbers fail to capture that.
The CEO of Hatchette UK was remarking yesterday on the 250% growth they saw in eBooks and expects it to settle at 50/50.
He's missing the point.
Replace the word 'eBook' with "MP3". Replace HardCover and paperback with vinyl and CD. Digital music overtook physical sales last year and the pace is still accelerating.
I think our industry is already reaching the tipping point where publishers are looking at a losing proposition in print. Too many of them are reporting reduced income from that side of the company while still posting overall increases to EBIT - mainly due to increased digital sales.
It's developing it's own gravity...

I see POD becoming the ONLY avenue for print books in five years, besides small, regional presses. Even those I believe will make the shift to stay competitive.
I'm strictly Old-School, when it comes to reading. I loves me my paper and smelly ink; but this week, I responded to an offer from the NY Times and Barnes & Noble, to get a free Nook simple Touch with an eSubscription to the paper. It cost me less than half what my print monthly cost me, and I love the damned Nook so much I just bought a book I've been meaning to read. The eInk display is so amazing, I'm already half-way through in two sittings. If I could embrace the new tech reading, then anyone can, and probably will.

I also love my paper books, to a certain extent. My C.S. Forester books have started to fall apart from repeated re-reading. Had I kept them in better shape, they might have ended up on Antiques Roadshow.
Richard, you are probably right about POD. The CEO of Bertelsmann AG has just announced that they are focusing on the digital side of the business. That goes double for their subsidiary - Random House - who has been leaving a lot of money on the table.
Most big publishers are still trying to figure out a way to protect their paper sales. RH belongs to a bigger firm that seems to have stepped back far enough from the trees to see the forest. They may well end up leading the big six into the future.
With my first book I was aiming for 500 pages. I didn't get there, but for me it wasn't about how many pages I could produce.
I wasn't going to throw in filler to fill up 500 pages. I stopped when I felt the story was whole and complete so finished where it finished.
Some people are happy with 200 pages, others less.
I understand that formatting can make a difference, but I'm referring to single spaced, standard size font.
What are your views?