Book Club discussion
EDITING
date
newest »


You're so very correct, I submit you were correct in not just letting that go!! I totally see your point and agree with.
I dare say this has been the most inlightening and fun discussion I have had on this website to date. I only wish more people were getting involved in it. I hope in time others will read along and join in.
Thank You Sharon! Excellent points all around!

How do you Edit your pieces?
Is there a procedure you follow? Looking for misspelling, then punctuation, then etc.?
Do you read your entire piece backwards sentence by sentence so as not to get caught up in reading the piece and looking just at the mechanics and grammar?
Blindly, make the corrections somebody else suggests because you don't know any better. (This is my style, as I couldn't write a proper sentence to save my life.)
What and How do authors edit their work, techniques, tips of the trade?
Please share! We are here to help one another, correct?

After all of that I send it to at least 6 beta readers. It's not a magic number, just a thing I have. I edit based on their feedback send send it to half that many (at least) for a second round. If I had a lot of cash, that's when I'd send it to an editor. ;)

How do you Edit your pieces?
Is there a procedure y..."
First, I write. Even if it's crap, I get it on the page. I don't even worry about typos at that point.
When I've finished the first draft, the first thing I do is spell check. I know that won't pick up everything, but it will get a lot. The next thing I do is let it rest for a few days ... and then I read it through. Waiting helps me see it more clearly than if I tried to do the next edit immediately. I inevitably find something spell-check missed, and I can fix grammar gaffes as I find them. Then, I wait a few more days and do it again. By then, I'm in my third draft and I still consider it rough. That's when I hand it off to beta readers. Like Renee, I follow through on their feedback ... and then wait a few more days before going over it one more time.
Next, I convert it to a .doc (I use Mac) and send it through Microsoft's spell check (which sometimes picks up things the other one missed) ... and then it goes for the last beta read.
Even after all of this, I want you to know that I still sometimes find things in the printed proof that need to be fixed prior to release.

First draft finished - means I've written The End on the ms - I'll give it a few days to 1 week to stew, and then I'll do a read-through, start to finish. Since I've also been trained as an editor, at this point I will notice (or have a better idea) on what words I'm crutching on, what expressions I'm using often. I'll also pick up character specifics here, for example, my heroine says "good grief" and my hero says "Gorblimey". I'll also spot if there are plot holes and/or ambiguity at certain parts, if continuity is working, that sort of deal (just FYI - this is what is called, and what I also call, Broad Notes. It's the first edit a client receives if I'm hired as full-scale editor. Generally, this is "what is wrong/not working with this story). No line by line so far.
Next round of edits is to address crutch words, recurring expressions, clean up the different POVs and make them distinct.
After that, another round where I go through line by line, looking at the words and not the whole story. I have a tendency towards passive voice, and using "and" a lot in my sentences. I'll look for these here, tighten the verbs, that sort of thing. Correct punctuation, grammar, etc. All the nitty gritty.
Another read-through, start to finish.
After this, the story goes to my beta readers. When their comments come back, I address whatever they have spotted.
By which time, I submit to my in-house editor. I'll also usually clean up the story according to the house's style guide.
Clear as mud, eh? :)

Once I finish the first draft, I let the work sit for a while... a few months. I started editing a work in this month that I wrote last February.
I edit one scene at a time.
1) I start by doing a simple spell/grammar check.
2) I listen to the scene using text-to-speech, making corrections as I go along. Each time I make a correction, I back up several sentences or even paragraphs to make sure I didn't incorporate any mistakes and the work flows smoothly.
3) I check for overused words using the AutoCrit Editing Wizard.
4) I repeat step #2.
5) I repeat step #1.
6) I move on to the next scene.
Once I finish the entire work, I'll send it to beta readers. If any changes are needed, I'll make them and repeat the process above on the scenes which were changed.
I'll read through the entire work to make sure I didn't incorporate any plot glitches. After that, I format the work for publication and send it out.
My work isn't perfect. Could additional eyes catch more errors? Sure! If you find one, send me an email, and I'll happily make the correction. :) Still, I'm comfortable with the editing job on my books.
I'm not shrugging my shoulders and saying, "That's good enough." I personally think I do a decent job self-editing my books for publication. Like I said, not perfect, but pretty good and nothing to be ashamed about.
Despite the occasional flaws, I don't think people read my works and reject my future books because of poor editing. For other reasons, sure, but not for the editing.
I have a firm grasp of the English language and take the time to be thorough. Only a handful of reviewers have mentioned finding errors but not enough to pull them out of the work. I don't know if they mentioned the errors because there are a bit more than they see in traditional works or if it's because my works are self-published and poor editing is a concern. Either way, reviewers mention the few errors they find as minor issues.
For me, an editor would be great to have, but cost-prohibited business-wise at this point in my career. If I had the money for editing, it could be better spent elsewhere to boost sales. I certainly don't think paying an editor $400-2000 would change my sales numbers. If my grammar and spelling were horrendous, I might think otherwise.
Really, everyone comes to the table with different skills and resources. It's up to the individual to determine how best to apply what one has.

Hear, hear, Renee!

Those of us who have made our living with grammar and mechanics (remember, I was once a newspaper editor) most..."
I agree Sharon! Then there are the authors who seem clueless about the difference between possessives and plurals...WTF???
How difficult can it be to at least run spell and grammar checks even if they're fallible??



Um, yeah. Possessives indicate ownership. Plurals indicate more than one.


Um, yes.


The co-author on my first book says that Microsoft needs an eff-up check with a button that looks like this: >:-(

:)

Way too many people use the Word Grammar Mangler and just blindly accept any suggestions it makes. Bad Move.
Doc

I've decided that this is a topic I take personally. In this new publishing world we inhabit, writers who don't know the basics have the effect of getting us all tarred with the same brush.
http://www.fatherspledge.com/and-now-...

I see it like this: If the individual has poor grammar skills, regardless of how flawed Word's grammar check is, it'll be better than what he/she can do alone. On the other hand, if the individual has decent grammar skills, he/she will be able to weed the good from the bad suggestions. And if the grammar check picks up even one error, the self-editor missed, then he/she's in the plus.
Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Anyone have any suggestions for grammar software which is specifically designed with the creative writer in mind? I've tried WhiteSmoke, which isn't bad. However, it's seems better for non-fiction writers than creative writers.

What Ideas do we have for the Indie Writer, the person who feels inspired to write no matter what, but they don't know English terminology, possessives and plurals, adjectives, verbs, nouns, dangling modifiers, and all the many others that make up this wonderful language. Spell checkers and grammar programs are not going to help me, or the many who are like me. I am studying English.
The two subjects that I can't seem to get a grasp on through reading a book in the entire Universe is Calculus and English!
I am creating a check list of things to check for, words that are alike but different, techniques and tricks and have save up 550 dollars to put towards paying an editor to help me with my next book. As soon I have a great editor and can afford it I will have both of my first books re-edited and fixed.
That's what's so frustrating is getting more five and four star ratings for those that get and actually read my work. The majority of those who read it love it. But I am getting ripped for the English, and that can be fixed. Just not be me with my meager skills and I am sure there are many others out there like me.
So creative hats on, Self-help English teaching books, programs, exercises, check lists and ideas for proofing, editing, and fixing the English and the Mechanics. Time to push the envelope and share.

One thing to consider with editing: It cost less to edit the more prepared your work is. For example, it's usually cheaper to contract for proofreading services than a line-by-line edit. Plus, after a line-by-line edit, it's still recommended to get a final proofreading. Some works might need a critique or developmental work before even getting to the line-by-line stage.
If you combine your skill with beta readers and critters, you might be able to safe yourself money. Might take a bit longer to get through your work though. It's the idea of picking two of the three: cheap, fast, and good.

The Elements of Style and The Complete Plain Words are both readily available and easy to use. I cannot recommend them highly enough.


Handbooks are invaluable, and taking courses is also good. But my suggestion is to get into a good critique group. And that applies to any writer, actually, since such groups give feedback on stuff like plot and character as well as mechanics. There's no substitute for having someone show you, via specific instances, how your sentences miss the mark (or conversely telling you what's good so you can build on it).

Oh, Mary, you are soooo right! It's partly why I get so frustrated, and yes, angry with writers who publish poorly edited work. People learn their English from reading. And how are they to know that a particular book is using horrible English!!

Those of us who have made our living with grammar and mechanics (remember, I was once a newspaper editor) most..."
Oh, I completely agree. You don't expect the plumber to work for free. Why expect an editor to do this??
All this has pushed me into posting a tutorial on my blog for writers and editors that I've been meaning to do forever on how to use Microsoft Word's Markup Tool.
For those writers who haven't used it, give it a try as it does leave your original file intact while visually providing access to changes, and allowing you to accept, reject, and comment.

Also Sharon I received my copy of "The Complete Plain Words" today to go with a collection of other English books to start learning how to properly put down my words in a correct manner. Thank You for the suggestion!
Books mentioned in this topic
The Elements of Style (other topics)Complete Plain Words (other topics)
How do you know if people want to read your work? Join critique circles, writer's forums, find beta readers, offer the work for free first. Selling a less than stellar product is not the way to find out if you're any good. It is the way to establish a reputation for shoddy work.
When you publish your work and sell it, you become a sort of business. Your readers are your customers. They have the right to expect the best product you can possibly give them. Two edits on a manuscript, and you feel that's your best? I disagree.
Let's look at it another way. If you bought your kids a pair of shoes and two days later the bottom fell off, you'd return it to the store for a new pair or a refund, no? What if the explanation for the shoddy workmanship was that the manufacturer couldn't afford to use the proper glue on their shoes but felt that the design and presentation was still worth the money so they went ahead and shipped them anyway with subpar glue so that they could make enough cash to use the good stuff on the next shipment? Would you be pissed off? Would you buy that brand again? Just as every step of the shoe manufacturing process must be done properly and with quality material, there are more parts to the writing process than a good storyline. I've stopped reading books based on weak characterization or shitty dialogue, even when the plot was really good. One good piece of material used with twenty cheap materials doesn't make it worth buying.
When you publish a book and ask money in return for allowing a person to read it, you're putting yourself up for criticism. This is how writing and publishing works. You're saying "Here, buy my book." The reader is forking over the cash and if he thinks it's crap, that cash that he paid gives him or her the right to say "this had twenty typos and the dialogue sucked". Just because he didn't like it doesn't put him under any obligation to offer you "free" help. You didn't offer him a "free" error-filled book.
Editors are part of the writing process for a reason. They have value. It seems a lot of money to fork out, but it is more than worth it. If you choose to go the self-publishing route, that's the price you pay. I've edited work by other authors, and let me tell you, if it were me doing it as my job, I'd charge a hell of a lot more than the prices I've seen listed here.