Mockingjay
discussion


That also felt like lazy writing to me! As if it was just written as a way to have Katniss "decide" (though, she didn't really choose) to be with Peeta rather than to pursue whatever feelings she might have had for Gale.
I really dislike love-triangles, but especially ones written like that. It was an unsatisfactory conclusion to Katniss' and Gale's relationship as a whole.

So, aside from Katniss; her creator Collins is also to be blamed.


Yeah. As far as I'm concerned, anyway. Collins, I think, is capable of making good characters with good character development. With Katniss, she just...I don't even really know. Katniss could have been so much better, in my opinion, and even if you didn't have the portions that are just lazy writing (again, in my opinion), it would have been better, too.

Agree.

Yeah. As far as I'm concerned, anyway. Collins, I think, is capable of making good characters with good character..."
Katniss did have character development. Sadly, she developed into an unlikable and extremely confused person. As for the ending (what you call lazy writing) was disappointing. However, I don't really see any other way the author could have ended the series. The entire trilogy lead to the point where the rebels took over the government. After that, what else was there? Katniss had Peeta because Gale was an idiot ditched her when she needed him most. Her family was destroyed when Prim died. She didn't have a place as a leader in the new government, because she had been used as pawn and figurehead, no more. Plus, she was an emotional wreck and couldn't handle responsibility. The author wrote herself into a "corner". There really wasn't that much more that she could have done to the story to produce a better, more satisfying ending.

WinterRose wrote: "Katniss is one of those characters that I started off liking and ended up hating by the end of the series. I couldn't stand her, but what's more is how worshipped she is by everyone else. I found h..."
i feel exactly the same way
She voted yes to tell Haymitch what she wanted to tell him before, that she thinks Coin is responsible for Prim's death. She wants to find out if he understands her. That is also why she adds: for Prim. She knows Coin is the reason Prim died, therefore having another HG for Prim is not logical for her to want. What she does want is to talk to Haymitch about it, but she can't and that is why she does it like this. You should not be taking her vote literally.
In the epilogue it is evident that the HG ended and also how Katniss feels about them:
"The arenas have been completely destroyed, the memorials built, there are no more Hunger Games.But they teach about them at school, and the girl knows we played a role in them. The boy will know in a few years. How can I tell them about that world without frightening them to death?"
Without frightening them to death. So, this is how Katniss feels about the HG.

Throughout the entire series i found her to be a whining little girl without developed thought.
What really pushed me to the edge was how she voted to continue the..."
I dont think she actually meant to continue.I think it was at this moment that she decided to kill coin as her question to continue hunger games confirmed that she indeed had ordered the bombing that resulted in Prim's death

I don't understand how the propos were her fighting back. They were mostly District 1..."
This is really late bc when I commented before I thought it replied to you, but what I meant was that I felt like she just didn't know whether to trust the others or not, but she did want to help (which is why she did the props.) The propos were scripted at first, but then they realized that wasn't working and things only worked out when she was being natural. And she did a lot of things - like attempt to save 8, showed mercy to that boy in (I think) 8, etc. And I admired her when she and Johanna, even when they were in immense pain, got up every morning to train and generally stood up for themselves.

Throughout the entire series i found her to be a whining little girl without developed thought.
What really pushed me to the edge was how she voted to continue the..."
THANK YOU!
She is whiny, ungrateful and selfish. Frankly, she is the worst character of the trilogy.

Throughout the entire series i found her to be a whining little girl without developed thought.
What really pushed me to the edge was how she voted to..."
I seriously hope you are kidding. "Ungrateful" though? Seriously? What did she have to be grateful FOR? So much bad was going on. And she's as selfish as anyone else, except she did have moments of selflessness - like when she's saving someone.


Answer: No, we did not read the same book. Books can be analyzed and taken different ways. The people whose opinion differs from yours -- they're NOT ignorant. They have an opinion that's fine for them to have, mind you.
Your comment is just plain rude.


I agree with you. She was a real girl trying to survive under conditions that would crush most people. Her motivation from the beginning was trying to do the best she could in increasingly difficult times. She was never in control of her own life and didn't expect to be. She was pushed from one situation to another just trying to do the best that she could for those who depended on her. When the number of people who depended on her grew beyond her family and friends, she was overwhelmed and confused.
Doesn't it say something about this character that so many people can find so much in her to discuss?

Well, you are right. The part about Katniss's constantly going on about how it's 'all her fault' makes me dislike her in both book 2 and book 3 (not so much in book 2, but she became insufferable in book 3).
I mean, she's always quick to blame herself, she's always quick to condemn Gale, Distinct 13 and etc for their 'wrong doing' (regardless of whether it's real wrong doing or not); however she never condemns the Capitol for YEARS OF SUFFERING AND DEATH with as much passion (The most she does is expressing hatred toward Snow, I would give her that)

^^^^^!!!!!


For no reason.
I would be able to except Finnick's death better if it had been that he AGREED to go on a PLANNED mission to murder Snow. But he wasn't. He was dragged along because Katniss didn't think anything through.
At first Katniss's decision of giving her teammates a self-assigned mission to assassinate Snow made me feel very uncomfortable for I can hardly see any point for this mission aside from "Coin is EVIL!" and "I hate Snow! He needs to die!". Then I thought more closely about it, there really is hardly any point for Katniss to put her friends and teammates into so much danger just because she thinks Snow needs to die. After this realization was driven home, I feel very pissed off that so many people died because of Katniss. And this time for real, she has herself to blame.

I agree. And Katniss, for me, is one of those situations where though I like and appreciate when characters have flaws, Katniss just has so many that it makes her an unbearable character to follow. Everyone knows people like that in real life too. Those people whose flaws take over and never allow the good qualities to show. That's what Katniss is like for me.

If only in the end, Katniss did feel sorry for leading her friends and teammates to their untimely death, I would have liked her or at least been able to put up with her better. But this doesn't happen. Not only she becomes Bella Swan in the end and to make things worse, "I lost everything and everyone" is basically what she has in mind, not once has she thought about "my friends died because of me and my stupid decisions". That's insufferable.


But didn't they know that the mission wasn't real? She felt bad and told them that she just wanted to kill Snow, and they said that they already knew.


PS: Thanks for reading all of that.



I am glad you cleared that up, I understand it a lot more and sympathize a lot more with Katniss' Character.

Yeah, Katniss would definitely be much less desired of a character if she actually wanted a new hunger games

I agree. Like she changed as a character throughout the books, and she did become less likeable. That was why it took me so long to read Mockingjay because I just didn't enjoy Katniss as much.

By the second book she is damaged, her thinking is a little left of center. You can't 100% trust her to know what is happening around her, but on the whole she sees things pretty normally.
In this book, Katniss is no longer a credible narrator and I credit Suzanne Collins for pulling that off. She's drugged, she's been through the grinder twice, she's had a complete plot pulled off behind her back, and so on. What you see as whiny is her preoccupation with what she's been through, but the bigger picture is that she has a heightened sense of her importance in the world when really she serves very little purpose and doesn't know how to handle that.
By the end she figured out that she has a skill and its to kill. So she goes uses it to kill Coin, who is really the bigger villain.

Throughout the entire series i found her to be a whining little girl without developed thought.
What really pushed me to the edge was how she voted to continue the..."
She was being used. Her life wasn't her own. The Capitol used her and others from the district to show their power over the people. Then they used her to "show 'em their place" when they put all victors in, to show that no one was safe. Then district 13 was using her as the mockingjay to help promote their agenda.
Any person who is put through war and what they went through isn't going to act like a typical person.

Did she have proof that Coin was a bigger villain? All that's said is that she MAY have deployed the bomb and that's by SNOW'S word, right? (I suppose you can count the new Hunger Games idea, but that's a very tiny sliver of evidence and personally doesn't convince me.)
If she didn't have any real evidence (not to mention since Coin wasn't put up to execution by the law), what Katniss did was wrong. She should have killed Snow considering she had real evidence of that he was good-for-nothing and he was put to execution by the law.

I didn't mention this part before because it's too stupid. Snow told Katniss Coin is the evil mastermind behind the bomb which killed Prim and the kids from Capitol, and guess what? Katniss believe his words instead of doubting that he may have said those things to mess with her mind!
Katniss actually believed the words of a man who put kids in front of his mansion to use them as a shield.
But Mariah, in here our opinions are the unpopular ones anyway.
If she didn't have any real evidence (not to mention since Coin wasn't put up to execution by the law), what Katniss did was wrong. She should have killed Snow considering she had real evidence of that he was good-for-nothing and he was put to execution by the law."
Aside from that, I don't know why Katniss killing Coin can stop the Hunger Games for Capitol kids. Coin claimed that there're many citizens wanting to see a Capitol Hunger Games, and I believe it's true, and how would Coin's death result in the Capitol Hunger Games being called off and suddenly all citizens stop wanting a Hunger Games for Capitol's children!? Come on, those people wouldn't suddenly stopped wanting revenge just because Coin is dead.


Good question you ask here, Falen.
And if Katniss actually admits she had caused (at least partly caused) the death of her teammates, I would be okay with her. But it never happens.

Falen wrote: "i did a little. like when everyone started to die i was like 'what will make her realize that she is killing everyone?' but i had to remind myself that she is doing it for her and everyone. How man..."
I think figureheads often take all the credit. That's what Katniss was--a figurehead, a pawn of the revolution. Few of the people behind the scenes got any credit for their role in overthrowing the government. And maybe some of them liked it that way. WIthout attention on them, they were free to do what they wanted, without the consent of the districts.
Yes. It was absolutely selfish that she never apologizes for the deaths she caused (or was involved in causing). However, the reader does get to see how sorry she is. For instance, when she doesn't follow the cards at her speech and a man is shot, she freaks. Sadly, she couldn't apologize in that situation because Snow wanted her to pretend that nothing had happened.

Did she have proof that Coin was a bigger villain? Al..."
Like I said, she isn't a credible narrator. Whether you or I logically think Coin was or was not a greater villain, she was groomed to believe Snow throughout the books. So when faced with one evil or another, she made a choice.
And this, more than anything else, shows her character development because for so much of the book she shrank away from facing her demons. At the end, she made a choice.

And this, more than anything else, shows her character development because for so much of the book she shrank away from facing her demons. At the end, she made a choice. "
Though I don't agree with you, I can see your point. For me, even if the narrator isn't credible, the readers should have enough REAL evidence of something like this. It really, to me, felt like it was done for shock factor, like a lot of things throughout the Hunger Games series was.
Throughout the entire series i found her to be a whining little girl without developed thought.
What really pushed me to the edge was how she voted to continue the..."
Aeva wrote: "Personally, I disliked Katniss.
Throughout the entire series i found her to be a whining little girl without developed thought.
What really pushed me to the edge was how she voted to continue the..."
I completely agree with you. She literally complained about dumb repetitive things on every single page and half the book she was sedated UGH Suzanne Collins you disappointed me :(

However, I did find her very irritating at some points. She was whiny and her "bravery" quickly became annoying disobedience. She was hard-headed and selfish.