Pulp Fiction discussion
General
>
Currently Reading


The intricate descriptions of the architecture, cars, fashion and interior design actually make me nostalgic for that era because I like the aesthetic so much... even though the story also makes clear how much of a dark underside there was to it all! Same effect as the TV series "Mad Men" has on a lot of people. The reason I dwell on this so much is that it results in Macdonald's books having a very different feel than Hammett's or most of Chandler's novels, where the characters usually *know* their world's a mess as a result of being in the middle of either the Great Depression or World War Two.
On a sociological level there's also an interesting Great Gatsby-style "old money vs nouveau riche" class conflict going on in that novel, though when Lew Archer goes to investigate things in the working-class parts of town the tone flips to something almost like a more worksafe Charles Bukowski.

Agree. Excellent writer. Excellent book.





My review:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
PS-Great cover:-D
3 stars.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Continues off the description I gave in this thread, but adds some more discussion of the story's central themes and how the novel - as well as the central concerns informing Ross Macdonald's signature style - fits into a larger context of cultural history... including a couple compare-and-contrasts most of the other reviews here don't consider.

which has an even better cover."
I have a copy of that too Al & i agree, if is an excellent cover.

Worth reading?
I enjoyed it, because it knows how to be funny about a serious subject, like crime. I also like Christopher Moore, and this noir-SF reminded me of him.

I kill men. I kill women because I don’t discriminate. I don’t kill children because that’s a different kind of psycho.
![]()

I listened to it too & liked it. Quirky & dark, but upbeat in weird ways, too. There's a sequel that wasn't quite as good, but still fun.

I kill men. I kill women because I ..."
The Spademan didn't really strike me as cold. I enjoyed the book, but since the story is mostly about him protecting the girl he was contracted to kill & the only individuals he kills are 'bad guys'...
Parker in the series by Stark is COLD. But Spademan? Not so much.
In the course of this story he talks the talk, but he doesn't really walk the walk.

In the course of this story he talks the talk, but he doesn't really walk the walk. "
But at the beginning of the story, all you know of him is the talk.

Doesn't show up in Goodread's list of published items.
Or else I have a typo or two in the search.
Hammett & Chandler team to solve a crime.
I can't believe Joe Gores didn't sue.

Doesn't show up in Goodread's list of published items.
Or else I have a typo or two in the search.
Hammett & Chandler team to solve a crime.
I..."
I see its only available in paperback Still. It was published in the 70's, so i don't think JG would have grounds for suing:-D
'Hammett' by Joe Gores is my next TBR.

Gets a really good feel of the cultural and social divisions in early-1950s California too, as well as the architecture and geography of the place. I think the character of Joe Tarantine is supposed to be one of the hot-rodder street racers that Tom Wolfe wrote about in "The Kandy-Kolored Tangerine Flake Streamline Baby"?

Am I the only person who gets very similar vibes from the movie "Zodiac" as from that Martin Beck novel? Not just the entire "serial killer loose during the Summer of Love" concept, but also the way the plot is structured switching between the murderer + the police + affected civilians. Wouldn't be surprised if David Fincher used it as inspiration.
A lot of great writers were inspired by the work of Sjowall and Wahloo. I found some of the greatest names in the genre writing the introductions to the Martin Beck series, and remembering how they came across it and what it meant to them.

I still consider Sjowall and Wahloo to be the best of all time in terms of Scandinavian crime writing. I read their complete series some time back, but to this day I can tell who's been influenced by their work.


Not to intentionally be argumentative, but personally, I don't see the connection to Sjowall and Wahloo; Ellroy's style of writing is unique in its own way. I can definitely see Kerouac in Ellroy, as well as Hammett, but Ellroy is definitely in a league of his own.


he definitely has some of Céline's pessimist outlook, that's for sure.

I had a chance to meet Jo Nesbø and he cited Sjowall/Wahloo as one of the two factors largely responsible for the quality of Scandinavian crime fiction. The other factor was that Scandinavian bookstores tend not to categorize crime fiction into a lesser mysteries subgenre.

The screenplay, also written by Homes, makes Jeff’s choice of his personal “gallows” over the good girl more clearly a matter of the universe he came from—the city, with its challenges, illusions, seductions, and its belief in “the orgiastic future” of which Gatsby’s friends dreamed. The film, directed by Jacques Tourneur, reminds me—with its images of remote, wide-open spaces without people—of something else in _The Great Gatsby_, about “ that vast obscurity beyond the city, where the dark fields of the republic rolled on under the night.” A novel and film about the American Dream. Noir--maybe best delineated in pulp.
Nancy wrote: "I've finished a truly good pulp/crime novel, Fantômas, by Marcel Allain and Pierre Souvestre."
Thanks for the tip : I think I saw the French movie with Jean Marais when I was a kid , but I don't remember anything of the plot. I know it was fun.
Now I am interested in the book!
Thanks for the tip : I think I saw the French movie with Jean Marais when I was a kid , but I don't remember anything of the plot. I know it was fun.
Now I am interested in the book!

Thanks for the tip : I think I saw the French movie with Jean Marais when..."
I may revisit a more modern version of the movie -- the one I watched was a silent from 1913. I wasn't sure I'd like it, but it was fun.

Another thing is that this sense of historical continuity really gives some extra weight to how the series reflects cultural and social change in Sweden during the 1960s/1970s. There's quite a few crucial plot elements that rely on the police being rather confused by crimes they're not used to occuring on a large scale or even at all in Sweden until then, in the case of "The Laughing Policeman" it's a spree killing of the sort they've only heard about from the US and in "The Man on the Balcony" a serial killer of the sort that the Swedish police then weren't used to.
Also, if you pay attention to the just basic interactions the cops have with civilians, it's clear that social mores and cultural lifestyles have changed a lot since the first book in the series (which came out in 1965 I think) to the one I'm reading right now. (from 1969)

I read an interview with Sjowall where she notes that "The story of a crime" refers to to the failure of the system -- the social welfare system of Sweden and the promises it held for the people. Don't forget -- he was a major lefty and he penned this series to bring out a lot of the problems that came about as business (I.e. capitalism) and money became more important than people.

Come to think of it, they kind of took the same approach to writing police novels as John Le Carré did to writing spy novels.

Here's a piece of the interview (which was, as I mistakenly wrote not done with Wahloo, but with Sjowall, mistake now corrected):
"We wanted to describe society from our left point of view. Per had written political books, but they’d only sold 300 copies. We realised that people read crime and through the stories we could show the reader that under the official image of welfare-state Sweden there was another layer of poverty, criminality and brutality. We wanted to show where Sweden was heading: towards a capitalistic, cold and inhuman society, where the rich got richer, the poor got poorer."
Excelent quote, and a remionder that the authors planned the whole 10 book series as a whole. I have finished them last year, and the social commentary tends to become heavy handed in later books, but the sharpness of the observations and the personal dramas remain top notch.


My review here - https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

That's true, you definitely have to look at it as more of a character study. There's no heist, no detective story, basically just a guy trying to score. But I think it's a great portrait of a certain type of male from a certain time period.

High Priest of California sounds interesting. Why does Charles Willeford sound familiar?


He wrote some classics, like The Cockfighter (which became a Warren Oates movie) and the Hoke detective series (Miami Blues, etc)

Also, interesting how it uses the winter season so instrumentally in its themes as "The Man on the Balcony" used the summer theme.

Of course, he has no conscience, no compassion for anyone, and power is his only aphrodisiac. He’s a product of deep forces in post-war America.
I have a Goodreads review of _High Priest_ at
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


After that I'm thinking of re-reading Hamett's The Glass Key


After that I'm thinking of re-reading Hamett's The Glass Key

I loved Beast In View!
Books mentioned in this topic
The Killer Inside Me (other topics)The Little Sister (other topics)
Deadly Mistake (other topics)
De Tanden van de Draak (other topics)
De Ondergang van de Donderdraak (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Raymond Chandler (other topics)Raymond Chandler (other topics)
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)
Naomi Alderman (other topics)
M. John Harrison (other topics)
More...
The problem with Simenon is that all of his Maigret books are good and I'm not sure which one is the most representative