The Humour Club discussion
Group Reads
>
January Group Read - Lucky Jim
date
newest »

Beats the hell outta me! I will be reading the Penguin Classics version, with an introduction by David Lodge, that I'll probably skip.

I'll be reading whichever one I can get first :P

Oh, did someone mention garfield...I love reading garfield, except on Mondays...I hate Mondays :)


You could consider it an early Xmas present from me?

"Dear PM,
I just want to write you a quick note congratulation you on doing such a good job showing the world how out of touch you are with the real values of Canadians. Pulling out of the Kyoto Accord...."
I really did write and send this. I'll let you know what the response is.

There is also a date stamp, from when my library got the book, 1974! Isn't that funny!
Oh, I have big expectations for the rest of the book.
Wow! Can't believe you've started already. I'm still trying to catch up on my December group reads.

Again, I don't have a problem starting things. My problem is finis...

I feel it is a good thing, that it sounds non-confrontational, even friendly? Is this an upper class accent or something?
Bugger, I feel I'm losing a lot out of this book b/c I don't know english accents!
Perhaps we can recruit Hazel or Pez to translate for us. They were quick to fill us in on the "bugger" thing.
I have heard the term "Geordie" for the same thing, and I had the feeling it was a slur.
I have heard the term "Geordie" for the same thing, and I had the feeling it was a slur.

But, since I vowed I'd finish this...I need to rant.
It's just not that funny! The story is stale and doesn't seem to go anywhere!! There is potential, with the quirky professor and Dixon's loathing of life, but it never materializes into anything?
I like extremes in my comedy writing I suppose, ie It's Thursday and the world ended. Or, It's 8:45 and 10 seconds, 11 seconds, 11 and a half seconds and the world ended! Pick one extreme or the other; that's funny.
Anyone else need a rant post?

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=g...#
northern accents have longer vowel sounds than southern ones, so tend to be softer.
The yorkshire accent, after a small time of the irrascible Mr Fry speaking:
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=y...#
the Barnsley dialect is the oldest dialect in Britain.
Accents change within a few miles, I live in York, where people pronounce the word sure as "shewer", I was raised to say it as "shur", and people in Haxby, 5 miles down the road, say "shore". British accents are a many varied and beautiful thing.
The geordie accent is generaly considered one fo the best for use in call centres etc, because of its calming influence... thogh a geordie in a rage is a scary thing. I lived in Newcastle for 7 years, I love the geordie accent, but still manage to get it wrong, and suggest a mackham has a geordie accent, and then you're in trouble...



I've noticed that posh accents transcend location, its about breeding. For example, at university there was a girl doing the agriculture degree that I shared a few lectures with, and she had a really upper class accent - marbles in the mouth, that sort of thing - and she was from scotland. She certainly didn't have a scottish accent, forbid the thought.

Where I live you Have Salcome, where all the celebs/footballers live, 20 mins down the road you have Plymouth, known as England's Detroit. With more crime per square mile than anywhere else in England, simply that the population is small that it keeps it low on the stats. Here we have the Navy, that Hate the Marines, who are also here. Both hate the locals. A ferry to France/Europe that drugs flow through. Weekends it is a battle. We have one of the two only classified RED bars in the country, in that every week a patron goes into intensive care through third party trauma. Weekend is a full on war zone. I worked the doors for 25 years and loved it, Far from posh!
Haven't even started yet. (Had to read a book by someone named SMITH for some OTHER group!)
Did you end up liking it more than you than you did in message 17?
Did you end up liking it more than you than you did in message 17?

Did you end up liking it more than you than you did in message 17?"
No. But, that may make for good discussion? I love ripping books apart *rubs hands together and chuckles to himself*

I know...I can't believe I said that. I feel there were a lot of face contorting references that lost a lot on the page and would be better suited for the screen.

I've just started too. It's interesting that Dixon is a basically a not-very-likeable character, yet I feel sorry for him because of all the fools he must suffer.
Even though he's American, I'm picturing Robert Morse (as he appeared in the film version of The Loved One) as Dixon --- and everything's in black and white.
Even though he's American, I'm picturing Robert Morse (as he appeared in the film version of The Loved One) as Dixon --- and everything's in black and white.

I can't picture exactly what he looks like, I'm picturing Robert Downey Jr. a bit?

However, he is slowly turning into Martin Freeman, even though Martin has the wrong accent, I reckon he'd be capable of it.
Gasp! Martin Freeman would be perfect!
Next time I make a film, I'm hiring Hazel as my casting director.
Next time I make a film, I'm hiring Hazel as my casting director.

I've grunted a few times. A couple of snerks and snorts. This is more droll and understated humor. Liking Jim more, mainly when I compare him to the dolts surrounding him.
I like that I honestly have no clue what will happen next.
Hope to finish today.
I like that I honestly have no clue what will happen next.
Hope to finish today.

I think this may actually be the case.

As for the other characters, I didn't mind the professor (and found his driving scenes funny) but all the other characters were very unlikable.
Was that one of the points of the book? Is that funny to some?
I once read the beginning of a book

Dixon reminds me of him. Seems Dixon is not evil, just a bit self-centred and lazy?
I did find the writing, as in choice of words, very funny and entertaining at parts. Here are a couple of examples just off the top of my head.
1) It was the perfect title, in that it crystallised the article's niggling mindlessness, it's funeral parade of yawn-enforcing facts, the pseudo-light it threw upon non-problems.
2) As the traffic thickened slightly towards the town, the driver added to his hypertrophied caution a psychopathic devotion to the interest of other road-users; the sight of anything between a removal-van and a junior bicycle halved his speed to a four miles an hour and sent his hand, Dixon guessed, flapping in a slow motion St. Vitus' dance of beckoning and wavings-on.
WoW! That is a mouthful!
I finished the book last night. I bought this title a few years ago, after hearing someone on Boing Boing rave about it. I'm glad I was finally forced to read it. It was a fun book. I doubt it's something I'll ever read again, but it's going back on my shelf anyway.
Amis's writing style reminds me of Evelyn Waugh - and I've read ONE whole book by him, so that makes me an expert!
As far as not liking ANY of the characters...believe it or not, it reminded me of "Seinfeld". I hated Jerry, Elaine, George, and even Kramer individually, yet they all worked well together to create great entertainment.
I thought the lecture scene was very well done, with Dixon looking out over a crowd comprised of just about everyone he loves, hates, wants to impress, or has royally pissed off over the course of the story.
Jim truly is a lucky man. He bumbles along from one thing to the next. Opportunities just seem to present themselves with no effort on his part - kind of like the film career of Steve Gutenberg.
I like that Jim was not a changed man. There was no Scroogian transformation, no vow to be a better person.
It was essentially a happy ending, but there are hints that ole Jim will need lots more luck in the future.
Amis's writing style reminds me of Evelyn Waugh - and I've read ONE whole book by him, so that makes me an expert!
As far as not liking ANY of the characters...believe it or not, it reminded me of "Seinfeld". I hated Jerry, Elaine, George, and even Kramer individually, yet they all worked well together to create great entertainment.
I thought the lecture scene was very well done, with Dixon looking out over a crowd comprised of just about everyone he loves, hates, wants to impress, or has royally pissed off over the course of the story.
Jim truly is a lucky man. He bumbles along from one thing to the next. Opportunities just seem to present themselves with no effort on his part - kind of like the film career of Steve Gutenberg.
I like that Jim was not a changed man. There was no Scroogian transformation, no vow to be a better person.
It was essentially a happy ending, but there are hints that ole Jim will need lots more luck in the future.

i don't know if you'll be able to see this outside of the UK:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0-ezI...
I love Peep Show! Another good example of not-quite-likeable characters doing rather nasty things to one another -- yet somehow -- it's funny! A good comparison, I think.

I also found the story went nowhere, but, in the same sense Jim's world changed dramatically from beginning to end - he was lucky.
I liked the part when he got drunk and slept spread eagle on the bed...and then burned it?! That was actually pretty funny.
The lecture was pretty good too, with the heckles from the gallery and his friend passing out...I kept wishing, while reading the book, that there would be more 'extreme' situations like this. I guess I just like extremes, I find that funny.
Hey! How 'bout that! Now that January is almost over, I finally figured out how to add a book to our "currently reading" shelf.

I was thinking about the humour in this book. I think it would make a better play than movie; furthermore, a better play than book; a better play than graphic novel as well...opinions?
Has anyone ever seen the movie?
Lucky Jim is a 1957 British comedy film directed by John Boulting and starring Ian Carmichael, Terry-Thomas and Hugh Griffith. (wiki)
It's not available through Netflix.
Lucky Jim is a 1957 British comedy film directed by John Boulting and starring Ian Carmichael, Terry-Thomas and Hugh Griffith. (wiki)
It's not available through Netflix.
Books mentioned in this topic
The One Tree (other topics)The Loved One (other topics)
Lucky Jim (other topics)
And we have a winner!
The title for our first ever group read is Lucky Jim by Kingsley Amis.
Were Mr. Amis still alive, he would receive an all-expenses paid trip to Peoria, a gift certificate to the Michael C. Fina gift company, and a Garfield Chia Pet.
Instead, his estate will have the satisfaction of knowing that one or two people from this group will be reading his book.
See ya next month!