Leviathan
discussion
Should I read it?
date
newest »


Clearly people have differing opinions! Read it for yourself and report back here.

Just wondering, not in an argumentative way, why you thought the characters were unlikable?





Not like how the Uglies series is sci-fi but Leviathan is a steampunk series and steampunk is a subgenre of sci-fi so yes.
There are new animals and creations created from the genetic splicing of animal DNA or fabriacated animals and technological advances in war machines and other devices.



The writing does seem a bit rushed, I found some fridge logic, and what I call a dangleing detail in Goliath (the first book was just fine, I didn't find any distracting mistakes). But, Westerfeld isn't a poor writer (as displayed in Uglies), so I blame it on his editor.
Story-wise, it's brilliant, and original. The characters are very likeable and balanced, they have wonderful flaws. Deryn is over confidant, and Alek is naive, and a terrible liar (and it's very well-portrayed, and he suffers for it, his plot is propeled by his inability to blend in). I like the alternate history bit of it, to.
I sense that it would appeal to a wide range of readers, boys and girls, men and women. Unlike much of the YA fantasy, this story actually has strong ideas behind it, like gender equality, and what would happen in a world with advanced genetic engineering (though, I wish the author would touch on that a bit more, I wanna know more about the monkey luddites!).
I find that it's well-researched, to. There are actually a lot of facts in the book, and the author notes the things that are changed, and what really happened in WW1.
Overall, Leviathan is great.

Multiply their rating on the site by 2. :)

In terms of rating it, I give it a 9 for the worldbuilding and maybe a 6 or 7 for the writing. I would love to see more stories set in this alternate history.


Midnighters is more paranormal and I recommend it for people who like Horowitz's Gatekeeper's series. Uglies is sort of a BladeRunner type sci-fi book. Peeps is a cool vampire story. And Leviathan is an alternate history steampunk, which reminds me of Oppel's Airborn. So I like all of his series, but I read all sorts of genres.

I loved the three. This one does drag a little as others said, and I found the youngness of the main characters pretty distracting at first but honestly it was just something *I* had to get over because they're certainly mature enough.
The world is so expansive, across the series they visit many places and meet a lot of familiar people (particularly in the third) and I found it to be, overall, among the most immersive pieces I've ever read.
The only thing to keep in mind is that one of the most common complaints I've noticed is the dryness of the mechanical descriptions or even some of the biology of the darwinists (though that's not really hashed out a whole lot in actual scientific detail) Many found this boring, but I found it fascinating. Likewise the ever-present politics. If you don't find the WW1 part of the premise at ALL appealing it may not be the book for you.

Some things were pretty predictable - especially when you have a story in which the main female character masquerades as a male - but still entertaining.


So the bottom line is READ IT!!!!


As for the argument that I've heard before-that it's not a good example of Steampunk-I disagree. I've read a fair amount of Steampunk, and Scott did an amazing job with his concept.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Leviathan (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
The Secret Hour (other topics)Leviathan (other topics)
I think that you would really enjoy the Leviathan trilogy if you've enjoyed the Uglies series and Peeps.