The Lightning Thief question

he was OK he was good looking but he was too old and had blue eyes instead of green.

I think awesome. When I watched the movie, I noticed that he never stopped moving, just like if he had ADHD. He was always tapping his fingers of something. I liked the movie. But Annabeth didn't have grey eyes.

Agree. The movie by itself is not to bad, but compareed to the books, well, it doesn't compare at all. I think Logan LErman did really well at how the portrayed a younger Percy, but Annabeth sort of ruined it for me. She was way to old, and way to violent.

If he were 12 it would have been perfect. :):)

Honestly, the movie sucked, we get it. So different from the book. I think the director and writers screwed it up and took a wrong approach. And Logan didn't capture really capture the Percy from the books that we all know and love, but he still did a good job acting out the "movie Percy"

in my opinion logan lermans eyes are more green, but hey maybe i'm just colour blind. i thought he did great, but he was to old.

I thought he did an amazing job. Sure he was a little to old, they all were. but he pulled it off and looked amazing while doing it.

I liked him :D, he did a great job, or I think so. :D He was also cute ;)

But I didn't like Alexandra Daddario as Annabeth. Annabeth is suppose to have BLOND hair and GREY eyes not Dark hair and blue eyes

Logan really was too old, but he really looked like an older Percy would, except the green eyes....
but Annabeth was NOTHING like Annabeth should be!!! not just how she looked like...everything...=(

He was great! But they changed him actually. He's a little old for a young Percy Jackson and his voice is deep. Kay,

Logan Lerman did fine. But they totally ruined Anabeth's character. They made her into a half-Clarisse. Gah!

He was good, cute too.

Actually I first watch the movie than read the book..At that time I think Logan did a great job.. But then when i actually read the book I was very disappointed.. Logan was old to be Percy, but anyway Logan was handsome so i call it even.. As for the movie, the first part was a little same with the book, but in the middle it so much different. They even forgot about Ares and Kronos(evil dude)..(duh)..

I think the movie is only bad in comparison to the book, if you take it by itself it's an okay movie. Apart from the obvious age difference, I don't think Logan Lerman did a bad job (just don't get me started on Annabeth).

I heard that they're making the Sea of Monsters into a movie. How on earth are they going to do that?

I hated the movie, If I had to read the book or watch the movie I would easily read the book.

I think he looks like Percy would (just needs to be younger. I mean he was 17 in the movie!), but I couldn't really see him as Percy, but like others have mentioned, the movie messed up so much, you can't really see if he was good at Percy or not.

Yeah, the movie stunk! If you never read the books, it might be a good movie...

HE WAS TOO OLD! AND COMPAIRED TO THE BOOK THE MOVIE SUCKED...but the percy poser was...decent

I think he looked the part, even if he was like 5 years too old, and had a Percy like determination and humor, but he could have been better. Although considering how crappy the movie was, i suppose he was one of the better parts of it.

I liked him, and he's a perfect vision of Percy at 17, but they made Percy's personality really different in the movie so I can't really say how good he was for the character

I think he did okay but I didn't like his accent. It sounded kind of strange with my picture of Percy. But he did fit the picture in appearance though (with slight differences)

All he did was rock side to side before walking, hold his mouth open, and widen his eyes. I thought he did an horrible job.