Romeo and Juliet
discussion
If they'd have just stayed in bed...
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Stephen
(last edited Oct 21, 2011 01:48AM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 21, 2011 01:48AM

reply
|
flag



Yum! Those are tasty.
I think I'm the only one confused by this whole conversation... :(

I couldn't agree with you more. I'm way to confused!

I'm very confused as well. What are we supposed to be talking about, again?

Stephen wrote: "I started this topic to discuss the advantages of sloth. If R&J had just stayed in bed the world's most popular ampersanded expression would be PB&J. Instead we get this tragedy. That conversation..."
Pardon me, but I believe PB&J is a much more popular ampersanded expression than R&J. I, at least, have never heard the latter before.
As for "sloth in medieval literature", Shakespeare was not medieval, he was Elizabethan/Baroque.
You know, speaking of the advantages of sloth, I do believe it would have been much better if the Bard had been too lazy to write Romeo and Juliet in the first place. It is quite overrated.
Pardon me, but I believe PB&J is a much more popular ampersanded expression than R&J. I, at least, have never heard the latter before.
As for "sloth in medieval literature", Shakespeare was not medieval, he was Elizabethan/Baroque.
You know, speaking of the advantages of sloth, I do believe it would have been much better if the Bard had been too lazy to write Romeo and Juliet in the first place. It is quite overrated.

Actually the original comment was somewhat facetious. Sort of "tongue in chic"
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic