Fantasy Aficionados discussion
Discussions about books
>
When is fantasy not fantasy?


[Kirk]: What do you think Bones?
[Dr. McKoy]: Well, Jim, I'm just a simple country doctor.
[Kirk]: Stuff it Bones. Mr. Scott?
[Mr. Scot] Pull the Plug CAPTAIN! PULL THE BLOODY PLUG!"
[Kirk] SPOK!....SPOOOooOKK!

*Frantically punches GPS buttons*

*Frantically punches GPS buttons*"
I'm sorry, I'll stop and go away now. Carol, you don't have to use your magic fairy dust banish me from the boards again.

Anyhoooo, I probably broke all kinds of rules by having a combined sci-fi/fantasy bookshelf for myself. To me the divide between sci-fi and fantasy is much narrower than from either genre to realistic fiction. I know there's some feud going between the two, but I don't get it.

If things stay contentious then we insist on a marriage between Conan and Honor Harrington.

Wait a minute--on reflection, that doesn't work. That's a marriage of sci-fi and sci-fi. To make your plan work, we need to marry sci-fi and fantasy. Say, Princess Leia to Kvothe or that Drizzit fellow.

Leia and Drizzit would be fine but it mixes medias (movie/book [yes I know there are Star Wars books, but it's not it's home media])?????? Maybe Captain Kirk and Red Sonja???? Well, that's out to, Sonja was in a book first, before the really sad movie...
Maybe Frodo and River Tam???????

Wash: Mind control? Isn't that, like, science fiction?
Zoe: We live in a space ship, dear.

Pfft.
It's fantasy.
Fantasy!
Seriously, the technology and science(hah) in Star Wars is barely even background set dressing and has nothing to do with the story at all.
You could completely remove the space ships and lasers and replace them with naval vessels and guns and the story wouldn't change at all.
Add in the 'magic' of the Force, and you've got yourself a fantasy. It's just set in space is all.
It's fantasy.
Fantasy!
Seriously, the technology and science(hah) in Star Wars is barely even background set dressing and has nothing to do with the story at all.
You could completely remove the space ships and lasers and replace them with naval vessels and guns and the story wouldn't change at all.
Add in the 'magic' of the Force, and you've got yourself a fantasy. It's just set in space is all.

http://thetorchonline.com/latest/what...
Agree with that link, Masha.
Except there is only the one Star Wars Trilogy, and it is indeed Fantasy.
Except there is only the one Star Wars Trilogy, and it is indeed Fantasy.

Setting is part of what makes the genre. Take Lies of Locke Lamora and put him in New York in 1920 and you could have almost the same story.
Carol wrote: "Setting is part of what makes the genre. Take Lies of Locke Lamora and put him in New York in 1920 and you could have almost the same story."
Then it would be an Urban Fantasy. But still a Fantasy :P
Then it would be an Urban Fantasy. But still a Fantasy :P

Together, they will slay the universe! Mwaa ha ha ha ha

Except there is only the one Star Wars Trilogy, and it is indeed Fantasy."
A-men to that. And I'm holding on to my DVD version, thank you very much.


Not that wiki is the end all of knowledge, but yes, technology is part of what makes some things science fiction. Possible/ plausible technology taken to a point beyond what is available now or used in a way no one has thought of/doesn't use now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_...

Star Wars isn't Star Wars without the magic of the Force, the invisible power that has nothing to do with technology and is scientifically unexplainable and turns a man into superman. To me that makes Star Wars fantasy. You want to say Scifi/Fantasy, that's fine, but you simply cannot discount the Force.
Tech is as much a component of scifi as it is a component of any other fiction. Whether it is advanced or not is purely subjective to the time period the book deals with.
Tech to me in itself does not determine whether or not a book is Scifi. It's the overall presentation to me that makes that determination. Are books without advanced tech but deal strictly with psychic abilities not scifi?
Hence why indeed all fantasy/scifi is now lumped into Speculative Fiction.

Also, the Force is described as "an energy field created by all living things" - this can, and obviously has been, interpreted in a more mystical way, but it could also be interpreted in a more quantum kind of way, which takes it back to science.
Personally, I consider it to be a space opera, and I'm ok with thinking of it as a science-fantasy, but to suggest it's pure fantasy without a sci-fi cross-over boggles my mind.
(And the fact that the tech and whatnot is, arguably, just in the background doesn't mean it's not sci-fi, either. Just means it's soft sci-fi.)

What does this say to me? It's bloody ambiguous even to the target audience. If people who obsess over books (average GR person) can't agree on what fits into these categories, I'm guessing there's no hope for the random Joe that wanders into a bookstore.
Short version...the genre's a mess of confusion. Not that that's good or bad. It just is.

The whole thing is basically one big fantasy in space. It doesn't have any real elements that would make it science fiction. The technology elements are range from completely violative of known laws of science (which is a no-no in science fiction unless you provide a good, scientific rationale for it) to things that might or might not be consistent but are never really explained.

If I met George Lucas I would spite in his face for the things he has done to Star Wars. I could care less about his opinion, especially since it seems he's only about making money.

Just sayin'.


Just sayin'."
^This!! lol
Mach wrote: "Everyone can discuss all they want but the movies are classified as Sci Fi for a reason and that won't change no matter what anyone say."
Pfffft. If I buy it, Lucas is my bitch.

Just sayin'."
Not to mention making Han Solo not shoot first. Supposedly he changed it in this new re-release, but the damage's been done. If he's that lacking in understanding of what he's created, I don't care what he would call it.

Masha - yes, he did change Greedo shoots first in the new version. Now, not only does Greedo shoot first but he actually shoots himself and Han desperately tries to employ CPR to save him :)

To me, its Space Opera, which all has some elements of fantasy, especially Star Wars. The reason being is that he took Joesph Campbell's hero's journey and applied to in term of Science Fiction. That is the reason why it connects with more people than the usual science fiction story.

As for Joseph Campbell - always interesting stuff. I like the functional approach he took to mythology.

I find Joesph Campbell and fantasy is done too much, that is why I love Drizzt so much.


Ham sandwich! LOL!!
Lucasfilms new release: Star Wars IIV: Ham Sanwich
Luke: I'm starving!
Hans: What do you want me to do about it?? Ask Chewy.
Luke: Chewy, I need a ham sandwich!
Chewy: rraaarwwwrarrrrr!! raarwer?!
Yoda: A ham sandwich, you may want.
Darth Vader: Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

In the new Star Wars, as envisioned by Lucas, I'm afraid it would be vegetarian sandwiches all around, or at the very least ham from a pig that died of natural causes or committed suicide :)

couldn't agree more. lol.

lmao

This debate has no answer. LOL
I think this because, imo, both sides are correct. It is both sci fi and fantasy because the story carries elements of both. :)
I liked the space opera explanation by Kevin, too.
Books mentioned in this topic
Magic Lost, Trouble Found (other topics)The Drawing of the Dark (other topics)
The Host (other topics)
The Host (other topics)
Necropolis (other topics)
More...
*runs in the general direction MrsJoseph went*