Challenge: 50 Books discussion
Group Reads
>
To Kill A Mockingbird
date
newest »

Hi, Faye. I'm looking forward to re-reading To Kill a Mockingbird (I'm trying to quickly finish the book I was already reading so I can move on to Mockingbird).
Any idea what the reading schedule will be?
Any idea what the reading schedule will be?

hmm. I'm still waiting for my copy form the library. It's been in transit since last week, so it should be here soon. Start reading, folks, but don't read make comments about more than the first quarter of the book yet, okay? When I get my copy I'll post a schedule.

Faye wrote: "Hopefully, my copy should arrive tomorrow. Anyone got started on this?"
I started yesterday, but I'm going slowly until there's an actual schedule in place -- I don't want to get too far ahead of the group read. When we did The Great Gatsby, I was ahead of the group since I'd already started the book; this time around, I want to be able to be on the same pace as everyone else, so I can comment in a timely manner and not either have to hold off on comments or try to remember what I was thinking back at such-and-such a chapter.
Ann wrote: "And those of you who are re-reading it will probably have forgotten just how GOOD it is!"
I'm seeing this as I'm reading. I knew it was a good book, but I'm stunned by how beautiful and engaging the writing is. I don't know if the 15-year-old me couldn't appreciate it, or if the 15-year-old me was so long ago, that I just don't remember how great it was.
I started yesterday, but I'm going slowly until there's an actual schedule in place -- I don't want to get too far ahead of the group read. When we did The Great Gatsby, I was ahead of the group since I'd already started the book; this time around, I want to be able to be on the same pace as everyone else, so I can comment in a timely manner and not either have to hold off on comments or try to remember what I was thinking back at such-and-such a chapter.
Ann wrote: "And those of you who are re-reading it will probably have forgotten just how GOOD it is!"
I'm seeing this as I'm reading. I knew it was a good book, but I'm stunned by how beautiful and engaging the writing is. I don't know if the 15-year-old me couldn't appreciate it, or if the 15-year-old me was so long ago, that I just don't remember how great it was.

I started yesterday, but I'm going slowly until there's an actual schedule in place -- I don't want to get too ..."
I agree with your view - I had the same feeling with 'Gatsby'. That's why I feel it is important to return to some books later in life - you pick up on different themes, different characters make bigger impressions, and the writing can become so much more beautiful.

Okay folks, the time line is:
August 19- 26 Chapters 1 - 10
August 27- Sept 2 Chapters 11 - 21
Sept 3 – Sept 9 Chapters 22- 31
Please post how this working for you, because if we all get through it faster than this, we may as well discuss it. Cheers.
August 19- 26 Chapters 1 - 10
August 27- Sept 2 Chapters 11 - 21
Sept 3 – Sept 9 Chapters 22- 31
Please post how this working for you, because if we all get through it faster than this, we may as well discuss it. Cheers.
I have only to read the Foreword included in my library’s copy to know that this lady’s genius:
Please spare Mockingbird an Introduction. As a reader I loathe Introductions. To novels, I associate Introductions with long-gone authors and works that are being brought back into print after decades of interment. Although Mockingbird will be 33 this year, it has never been out of print and I am still alive, although very quiet. Introductions inhibit pleasure, they kill the joy of anticipations, they frustrate curiosity. The only good thing about Introductions is that in some cases they delay the dose to come. Mockingbird still says what it has to say; it has managed to survive the years without preamble.
Harper Lee
12 February 1993
Please spare Mockingbird an Introduction. As a reader I loathe Introductions. To novels, I associate Introductions with long-gone authors and works that are being brought back into print after decades of interment. Although Mockingbird will be 33 this year, it has never been out of print and I am still alive, although very quiet. Introductions inhibit pleasure, they kill the joy of anticipations, they frustrate curiosity. The only good thing about Introductions is that in some cases they delay the dose to come. Mockingbird still says what it has to say; it has managed to survive the years without preamble.
Harper Lee
12 February 1993
I've read a few book club question lists and they all seem to have spoilers. At this stage, I'm just interested in what you think. So?
There are a couple of things that I just love about this book. Particularly, how the viewpoint of children are captured.
One has to look no further than Jem's description of what Boo Radley looks like than to be catapulted back into a childhood memory where you are are the youngest amongst siblings or cousins. How they egg each other on and exploit fears and let themselves be carried away by their imaginations.
I also love the small town aspect where a family's history is known to everyone and biology seems inescapable - also a timeless and global experience for us that live rurally.
Harper Lee paints a picture of the south that seems to come alive off the pages.
One of the book club questions I often see coming up is a request to comment on Atticus' parenting style. So far I'm in awe of his skills, but I don't know if the patience and excellent role modeling continues throughout the book.
One has to look no further than Jem's description of what Boo Radley looks like than to be catapulted back into a childhood memory where you are are the youngest amongst siblings or cousins. How they egg each other on and exploit fears and let themselves be carried away by their imaginations.
I also love the small town aspect where a family's history is known to everyone and biology seems inescapable - also a timeless and global experience for us that live rurally.
Harper Lee paints a picture of the south that seems to come alive off the pages.
One of the book club questions I often see coming up is a request to comment on Atticus' parenting style. So far I'm in awe of his skills, but I don't know if the patience and excellent role modeling continues throughout the book.


As for Atticus' parenting style - he does seem too good to be true, BUT, he is consistent throughout the story. AND it is noted that he is older than most parents. Scout, at one point says he is 'ancient'. Donna's comment about the rabid dog - is a good example of his unfaltering nature.

I think one thing that confused me about To Kill a Mockingbird when I read it in high school is that Scout and Dill don't sound like five- and six-year-olds, respectively. There are definitely times when the descriptions sound like they could come from a very intelligent youngster, but I just don't see them being *five* and six. Jem does sound like he's 10 (a very smart 10), but *5*?!? I think that kind of skewed the way I saw the characters in my head, and this time around I'm trying REALLY HARD to keep images of very young children in my head. Does anybody else have this issue? To me, they all sound like very smart 10-year-olds. But I do agree with Faye that Lee captures that tone of siblings and young boys egging each other on, or trying to one-up each other.
As for Atticus, I've always thought that he was the model parent. He talks to his children like adults, but is very patient if there are things they don't understand, yet he is strong and disciplines them when needed. Atticus is wonderful.
As for Atticus, I've always thought that he was the model parent. He talks to his children like adults, but is very patient if there are things they don't understand, yet he is strong and disciplines them when needed. Atticus is wonderful.
Tiffany wrote: "I think one thing... Scout and Dill don't sound like five- and six-year-olds, respectively. There are definitely time..."
While I haven't been having this problem, I can understand how you might feel that way. Maybe it would help to consider that the kids are ageing throughout the book. If Scout's in grade 2, she's probably 7.
While I haven't been having this problem, I can understand how you might feel that way. Maybe it would help to consider that the kids are ageing throughout the book. If Scout's in grade 2, she's probably 7.
Oh, definitely. I was even going to add (but forgot while I was typing) that Scout doesn't sound that young *when the book starts*. As it goes on, though, she grows up, and grows into the language.
One thing I find interesting, which also relates to Paula's comment about the writing taking you to a slower time, is that To Kill a Mockingbird is set in a pretty well-charged time and a pretty well-charged place, and yet, we don't hear about those events much, merely in passing. Is that a result of Maycomb being so far away from The Big City, and a slower and sleepy place, or is it because the story is told by a child (or, by an adult, recounting her childhood)?
We know that the Civil War is still pretty big in peoples' minds -- references are made to Generals, the guns, the fighting, the former soldiers -- like in a lot of Southern fiction (Faulkner, for example); Scout mentions near the beginning that Maycomb County (and the entire country, even though she doesn't say that) had recently been told they had nothing to fear but fear itself (from FDR's 1933 inaugural address, just in case anyone doesn't know where, exactly, that comes from); and in chapter 12, Scout mentions strikes and poverty in the country; but other than a few places where events are implied, it doesn't seem like Scout-the-narrator really spends time on them, or talks about how they affect Maycomb or her family. After the mentions of strikes and poverty in chapter 12, she even says "But these were events remote from the world of Jem and me."
I kind of like that. It adds to the story's backwoodsy feel, like Big City issues don't hit them as hard as they do in those Big Cities. And it also reminds you that the narrator is a child, and when you're a child (especially one who has a pretty happy life, a good family, and a good home), world issues don't really mean much to you (or not as much as they do to the adults). It's sort of like "Yeah, the president said this thing, but I had Dill," or "The adults were dealing with the bad economy, but let me tell you about our Boo Radley plays, because *those* are what's important."
We know that the Civil War is still pretty big in peoples' minds -- references are made to Generals, the guns, the fighting, the former soldiers -- like in a lot of Southern fiction (Faulkner, for example); Scout mentions near the beginning that Maycomb County (and the entire country, even though she doesn't say that) had recently been told they had nothing to fear but fear itself (from FDR's 1933 inaugural address, just in case anyone doesn't know where, exactly, that comes from); and in chapter 12, Scout mentions strikes and poverty in the country; but other than a few places where events are implied, it doesn't seem like Scout-the-narrator really spends time on them, or talks about how they affect Maycomb or her family. After the mentions of strikes and poverty in chapter 12, she even says "But these were events remote from the world of Jem and me."
I kind of like that. It adds to the story's backwoodsy feel, like Big City issues don't hit them as hard as they do in those Big Cities. And it also reminds you that the narrator is a child, and when you're a child (especially one who has a pretty happy life, a good family, and a good home), world issues don't really mean much to you (or not as much as they do to the adults). It's sort of like "Yeah, the president said this thing, but I had Dill," or "The adults were dealing with the bad economy, but let me tell you about our Boo Radley plays, because *those* are what's important."

This is what makes Harper Lee's characters trustworthy narrators of the story: the older Scout looks back knowing what was going on in the world - but she doesn't add that to what happened to her, Jem, and Dill as children.
A lot of times - events effect adults much more than children - only as adults do they look back and say ' i grew up during the depression and realize what they went with out' and it is the adults who realize what is missing during that time frame - what they are doing without. Kids just tend to go on and accept what is, as 'is'.

when Scout starts school, Jem is in the fifth grade, so there is more than a one-year difference in their ages. and there is a span of time in the book, because when Jem's arm is broken he is 13. Scout was already reading before she started school, and Atticus doesn't talk to them like children, so they have been exposed to adult language all their lives. that plus the fact that the story is told by Scout later in life would account for them not sounding like children.

Paula wrote: "A lot of times - events effect adults much more than children - only as adults do they look back and say ' i grew up during the depression and realize what they went with out' and it is the adults who realize what is missing during that time frame - what they are doing without. Kids just tend to go on and accept what is, as 'is'."
Exactly! Well-put!
Exactly! Well-put!

Rum-laced rhubarb lemonade? My poor Canadian self that's still waiting for the thermostat to break 18 degrees (64 fahrenheit) has no idea what you're talking about, Donna. Good thing Miss Lee does such a dang fine job of describing life in a sunny climate.
What a trial, eh? The trial arguments almost brought me to tears. This book is an opus. Atticus is my hero
I keep thinking to the writer's advice that one should write what they know. Harper Lee was born in Alabama and studies law, so this concept has worked well for her.
What a trial, eh? The trial arguments almost brought me to tears. This book is an opus. Atticus is my hero
I keep thinking to the writer's advice that one should write what they know. Harper Lee was born in Alabama and studies law, so this concept has worked well for her.
Faye wrote: "So what do you think of Aunt Alexandra? Why is she so concerned with Atticus' parenting style?"
My two (or maybe three) thoughts: 1) Disgrace. Atticus' children run wild and have lives that are "unacceptable" (that is, the girl doesn't wear dresses and live a well-mannered, proper [boring] life, and the boy ... well, Jem might be okay, since "boys will be boys."), and since the children are Atticus' children, and Atticus is her brother, that means that the disgracefulness of those two children is actually a disgrace to her family. We can't have people thinking we let our children run wild and play imaginative games, and teach our children to read when they're small tots and have minds of their own! No no! They must be acceptable and do what they're told, and not question adults. Anything else is a disgrace to our family name.
2) I sometimes feel like it's sort of an "I know better than you do" or feeling like she *must* know better than he does. Maybe she's just one of those people who always thinks they're right and knows more than others, or maybe (and this is where my third thought comes in) because Atticus is a single father, and Alexandra feels like a woman is needed to raise children "properly." Since she's a woman, she would know better (in her mind) how to raise children correctly than he would, thus she's overly critical of the parenting he has done to this point.
(Rambling, and sentences not written well. Sorry)
My two (or maybe three) thoughts: 1) Disgrace. Atticus' children run wild and have lives that are "unacceptable" (that is, the girl doesn't wear dresses and live a well-mannered, proper [boring] life, and the boy ... well, Jem might be okay, since "boys will be boys."), and since the children are Atticus' children, and Atticus is her brother, that means that the disgracefulness of those two children is actually a disgrace to her family. We can't have people thinking we let our children run wild and play imaginative games, and teach our children to read when they're small tots and have minds of their own! No no! They must be acceptable and do what they're told, and not question adults. Anything else is a disgrace to our family name.
2) I sometimes feel like it's sort of an "I know better than you do" or feeling like she *must* know better than he does. Maybe she's just one of those people who always thinks they're right and knows more than others, or maybe (and this is where my third thought comes in) because Atticus is a single father, and Alexandra feels like a woman is needed to raise children "properly." Since she's a woman, she would know better (in her mind) how to raise children correctly than he would, thus she's overly critical of the parenting he has done to this point.
(Rambling, and sentences not written well. Sorry)

She is definitely concerned about 'what people will think' - mainly that she isn't concerned with helping her brother raise his motherless children. Common opinion of the day (and of this day, too) would be that the women of the family are neglecting the children or they wouldn't be running wild. She could volunteer until she is blue in the face, and Atticus could still say 'thank you, but no' and she would take some of the 'blame' if the kids were wild.
Public opinion can be so harsh. I always loved the expression "Until you walked in another man's moccasins, don't voice an opinion."


i love Atticus. when i read the book (and saw the movie) i always wished that Atticus was my dad. so quiet, steady, confident, good-hearted, moral.
even more, tho, i love Scout. she is so curious, fearless, and intelligent. she works to hard to increase her understanding of the things that are going on around her, and she's not afraid to speak her mind. one of the great characters in fiction.
Faye wrote: "Who is your favorite character and why?"
I tried thinking about this for a few days, but I think my initial answer of "Scout and Atticus" (okay, *two* characters, not one) still holds.
Scout is fun, and kind of wild (She doesn't want to be a Lady; that's my kind of girl), and has a very good head for such a young girl. Atticus, as we've said before, seems to be the ideal father. He's raised his kids to have level heads (as level-headed as young children can be), he's always open to questions, he generally doesn't think they're "too young" for the truth, he tells them "It's not time to worry yet" to calm them in scary times, he taught Scout to read at a very young age... Atticus is just near-perfect. Can anyone think of a time when he wasn't practically perfect? Any time when you thought, "Ooh, as a parent, I wouldn't have done that"? So, I'm going with Scout and Atticus.
I tried thinking about this for a few days, but I think my initial answer of "Scout and Atticus" (okay, *two* characters, not one) still holds.
Scout is fun, and kind of wild (She doesn't want to be a Lady; that's my kind of girl), and has a very good head for such a young girl. Atticus, as we've said before, seems to be the ideal father. He's raised his kids to have level heads (as level-headed as young children can be), he's always open to questions, he generally doesn't think they're "too young" for the truth, he tells them "It's not time to worry yet" to calm them in scary times, he taught Scout to read at a very young age... Atticus is just near-perfect. Can anyone think of a time when he wasn't practically perfect? Any time when you thought, "Ooh, as a parent, I wouldn't have done that"? So, I'm going with Scout and Atticus.


Bless you, Miss Donna. I know how you feel. I live in a neighborhood where I could be every child's grandma.
Donna wrote: "Having already stated my preference, I must also say how much I enjoy Miss Maudie. We had neighbors like this when I was little. Their yards were ours as much as theirs. They were beyond patient an..."
I LOVE Miss Maudie, too. She seems like such a great neighbor! I wish I'd had a neighbor like her when I was growing up.
I LOVE Miss Maudie, too. She seems like such a great neighbor! I wish I'd had a neighbor like her when I was growing up.
So what's Boo Radley's story? I know from the beginning of the book that he got mixed up with the wrong crowd as a youngster, but what do you think explains his way of living since then?

Overall, I would have to say Scout. She sees and questions things. and makes the readers questions things. But, for a second fave - I would have to say Dill. He just seems to pop up with a story - whether true or not, he adds something exotic to the story but not so exotic. Dill is another motherless child. Someone who is passed around. Unlike Jem and Scout who has stability with Atticus and Calpurnia.

I think that the part that might be inferred, but not stated, is that Boo might have developed some form of mental illness. I don't think this is something Scout, as a narrator, would've come right out and said. It's not how a child would perceive an adult. Boo disappears at about the age schizophrenia starts to manifest. It would explain why he allows his father to basically incarcerate him and why he doesn't leave home as his brother did. I always see him as someone who never quite grew up, still a little innocent in his manner. He reminds me of my godson, inherently kind, but very unpredictable.
Spoiler Alert!! or is it when the material is so well known?
The thing that usually preys on my mind is that Boo apparently kills someone, yes, to protect the children, but still... Or maybe Tom Ewell did fall on his own knife....
You can review some quotes here: http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/searc...
I'd forgotten, "Pass the damn ham, please."
— Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird)
I'd forgotten, "Pass the damn ham, please."
— Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird)
I know I'm not posting some of the most beautiful ones, but this one's cute, too:
"She seemed glad to see me when I appeared in the kitchen, and by watching her I began to think there was some skill involved in being a girl."
— Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird)
"She seemed glad to see me when I appeared in the kitchen, and by watching her I began to think there was some skill involved in being a girl."
— Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird)
"Ladies in bunches always filled me with vague apprehension and a firm desire to be elsewhere."
— Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird)
Dang! Seems every quote I read is a winner.
— Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird)
Dang! Seems every quote I read is a winner.

"He and aunty looked alike, but Uncle Jack made better use of his face; we were never wary of his sharp nose and chin."
or this one:
"Miss Maudie's diction was deadly."
one that makes me laugh:
"Miss Stephanie, that English Channel of gossip."
or this one from the Reverend Avery that says everything:
"Miss Jean Louise, stand up. Your father's passin'"
Faye wrote: "So last question... what's your favourite quote from the book?"
I made note of these two while reading:
"Until I feared I would lose it, I never loved to read."
"Why, he [Atticus] couldn't get along a day without me. Even Calpurnia couldn't get along unless I was there. They needed me."
I think that last one is so sweet and so innocent :)
I made note of these two while reading:
"Until I feared I would lose it, I never loved to read."
"Why, he [Atticus] couldn't get along a day without me. Even Calpurnia couldn't get along unless I was there. They needed me."
I think that last one is so sweet and so innocent :)

love that - it's so true to how kids act

Books mentioned in this topic
To Kill a Mockingbird (other topics)The Great Gatsby (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Harper Lee (other topics)Harper Lee (other topics)
We'll probably have comments regarding certain chapters during certain weeks to avoid any spoilers.
** Yeah - The Timeline is**
August 19- 26 Chapters 1 - 10
August 27- Sept 2 Chapters 11 - 21
Sept 3 – Sept 9 Chapters 22- 31
This is shorter than Gatsby, but I have a feeling we'll have no problem ripping through this book,and, if we want to make that 50 goal, we got a lotta reading to do anyway, right?