State of Wonder
discussion
did anyone else catch this? SPOILER!
date
newest »

message 101:
by
T.D.
(new)
Mar 22, 2013 11:18PM

reply
|
flag


I also thought metaphor with the "suitcases" was interesting as well. In the beginning she lost all her luggage that one would think she has a lot of "baggage" to deal with. At the end of the book, her luggage and clarity in her life returns. Or, I seem to think that she is finally clear on what she wants. A new career in medicine. I think she returns to Amazon too.

I agree. I, too, thought the one-nighter was unnecessary and was disappointed that the author wrote it that way. I would have been more impressed if they slept through the night in each others' arms. To me, that is more intimate than a one night stand. It's been a long time since I read the book so I don't remember who initiated. Either way, Anders cheated on his wife. I can't imagine how devastated his wife would feel about the infidelity plus the baby that's on its way. smh

I think of Marina as being pregnant and also as likely to return to the Amazon. When she watches Anders with his family and feels as if she's not a part of the "world" before her anymore, to me, it's not just the Eckmans' suburban family world; it's the culture as a whole and doesn't, to me anyway, seem like a feeling that will pass in time.
I thought that the ending came at a good overall stopping point, however: it would have been too much to cover things like Marina and Mr. Fox, Marina's future career, and the fate of the malaria drug well.



I believe you are right about the baggage. That never ocurred to me but makes sense. Marina was carrying a lot of baggage - we just did not know the extent of it when she first lost her baggage!

Thanks Linda, I absolutely love to read and trying to figure out what the author is trying to say with character choices (names, and situations) and locations, etc. I also love how this thread keeps evolving.

I kinda was thinking that way but totally missed the clue. Like another commenter, I was disappointed with the two adults not acting as such in the end. It was the only thing I disliked. Really, the NEXT day he was home with his family! Over all a super book...with a disappointing glitch in the ending.

Yes, Reader50, she is an amazing writer.

I was thinking that she wanted to keep the "happily-ever-after" impact of the improbable husband-wife reunion in check. She also wanted to remind the reader that Marina and others won't be turning away from what happened in the Amazon and going back to life quite so simply as some readers might be tempted to think.
With the improbable relationships here, in Bel Canto, and in The Patron Saint of Liars, I've always thought Patchett was conveying the belief that people's attractions and attachments arise far more from the situation they are in than they do from the proverbial "who they are." Perhaps also the sense that shaping moments between people lead to impulsive decisions that have permanent consequences, in some cases with good results, in others with bad ones.
I also feel as if she's trying to avoid the pure image of the romantic hero/heroine without taking the simple route that some authors do--making their characters a lot of tragic messes. The whole idea of Anders is quite romantic and idealistic: man goes nobly and daringly into the Amazon for his work; wife pines and never forsakes her attachment to her beloved husband; longtime loyal intellectual companion of lost man journeys into the Amazon; man turns up alive after all of that time; man is reunited with platonic academic cohort; the two journey home where the wife-who-never-gave-up-hope will be reunited with her noble husband. Patchett lets the fairy tale have its time-earned power over us--but only to a certain extent because Anders and Marina have sex, and Marina comes home carrying his child.
Patchett has a real flair for the romantic and idealistic, and I think she knows how to work it to its maximum effect without letting it lapse into cliche or turn into a cheap device.



Maybe she doesn't care to be part of the experiment?


I tend to agree that Marina is pregnant as a result of the one night of intimacy she shared with Anders. It becomes clear toward the end how wistful she is about having delayed having children. I think of the conversation she has with the 23 year old Barbara Bowender that it is not a good idea to put off having children.
While I think Marina's pregnancy is necessary to the author's story arc and development, I also think the adultery angle fits in with the pattern of the story. She herself is the result of an affair between an Indian graduate student and a young woman from Minnesota. When he finishes his studies he returns to his life in India where he eventually takes a "proper" wife and has children, leaving his American lover to raise their child. Dr. Swenson carried on an illicit affair with her mentor -- the man who taught her everything. In the short story that follows, we meet Dr. Swenson perhaps ten years before the events depicted in State of Wonder. In the short story we learn Dr. Rapp essentially seduced his very young student. She was 23 and he was 42 and married with children. In State of Wonder Dr. Nancy Saturn is several years younger than her husband. She judges Dr. Rapp harshly for his adulterous affair with Dr. Swenson. Her husband so admires Dr. Rapp that he essentially shruggs his shoulder at the affair and has no problem visiting Dr. Rapp's wife knowing full well that his mentor is cheating on his wife.
Initially, I thought it would have made more sense for Marina to be carrying an affair with a married Mr. Fox. He is widowed in this story, but the clandestine nature of the relationship feels like he is married. I suppose he is married to his job at Vogel. Anyway, I think one-time intimacy between Anders and Marina was not a fluke on the part of the author. Marina has more clarity about her life and her future at the end of the story, but the author insists in inserting multiple layers of moral ambiguity in Marina's life both personally and professionally.
Ethics and moral ambiguities play a big role in this story. We know from his letters to his wife and even indirectly from the other doctors in the jungle that Anders loves his wife. But even at the outset of the story Marina explains that she worked hard to allay any suspicion from Anders's wife Karen that she had designs on her husband. If it weren't for that tension, Marina would have been glad to have Karen as a close friend.
The circumstances under which Marina and Anders share intimacy, while plausible, seem a little contrived. Anders tells Marina to move over and make room for him so he can share the tiny cot with her. He doesn't say: "Is it okay if I share the cot with you, I feel out of sorts." They're talking and he says scoot over like it's normal to share the bed with her. I think Anders knew exactly what was going to happen. Marina throughout the book has been woefully unself aware so I can believe she thought they would just cuddle.
Anyway, I liked the book very much, flaws and icky moments notwithstanding. I don't get the sense that the author will write a sequel. But I would not be surprised to see a film based on the book. As sure as I am that she breaks with Mr. Fox both professionally and romantically, that she takes up her profession as a practicing medical doctor, and that she is pregnant with Anders's child, I am not sure if she returns to the Amazon. And in keeping with the general theme of moral ambiguity I suspect she would not deprive her child the right to know his or her father, thereby throwing some kind of wrench in the Eckman household. But then that is life full of messiness.

Also, maybe the trees caused the women to crave being pregnant, so she got in the cot, because her body was demanding it.

Yes, of course. Great novel.





Nah, I'd truly lost interest at that stage. The whole thing was ridiculous. Sorry.

Personally, I think she will go back to the Amazon. I think she will go back to continue the research, to have her child in private, and to get Easter back again. I think her and Mr. Fox were done the moment he told her not to come back yet.
Eventually she might return to the US for good. For now though, there was too much left unfinished.


If anything— I loved that the novel was incredibly complex. It dealt with the emotional complexities of people under extreme stress and survival mode. It played with the way that grief bends the way we look at one another.
While I certainly don’t applaud the couple for having sex, I empathize, understanding their trauma and relief.
Marina left her home on a quest to find Anders, braved a new environment, loneliness, language barriers, constant lies, an uncomfortable environment, and faced her demons by actually performing primitive surgeries. She gut a snake trying to kill a boy, and then gave the boy up after her life being threatened.
All of that was under the broad umbrella of her quest to find Anders.
Anders likewise was traumatized, having been separated from his only companions for months, living with a dangerous people, facing psychological anxiety from his environment, and the physical struggle of continuing to deal with fevers.
To finally experience a moment of finally breaking emotionally and physically expressing vulnerability with a person who has been through the same trauma— it seems not out of place at all.
How brilliant that the author has Marina watch Anders return to his family. Like the trauma of the Amazon, she has been left behind.
Marina’s story seemed to center more around grief, abandonment, and self discovery. It seems fitting that the author would leave the end open.
Marina is a woman who is finally independent of everyone. Anders, Mr. Fox, and Dr. Swenson no longer control her motives. She is free to return to life in Minnesota and free to return to the Amazon if she chooses.
I think that the pregnancy idea doesn’t lend anything to the story. I think the theme of abandonment— Marina being left by her father, Anders, Mr. Fox, and then Marina in turn leaving Easter, is more poignant on its own.
Marina, finally an independent, grappling with her desire for a child, her career decisions, and whatever is next on her own— that is a compelling ending in and of itself.
I’d be disappointed to find a sequel to this cruel, beautiful and realistic world with its loose, fly-away ends.

I agree with all that you said except the pregnancy part - my feeling is that while yes her aversion to the bark was awfully quick, since the powers of the bark do not exist in reality anything can be "possible" (ah the joy of fiction); in addition, the fact that she was pregnant was not spelled out, one had to read between the lines. (Apparently a lot of readers did not pick up on that part.)
And one can think of it this way - she lost all that she had (her father, her original career, Easter, Mr. Fox, even Anders in a way) but was in the end left with something new to live for, something she had wanted but thought it was too late for.
Gosh I loved Anders' reunion with his family. I have read this book 3 times - I found it so rich, haunting, and moving it was worth my time re-reading, but mostly I reread it to re-savor the vision of that reunion.
BTW it is my understanding that Ann Patchett does not have (or ever had) plans for a sequel.


I agree that the scene with Anders was to set Marina up as being pregnant at the end. There were allusions to her longing for a child throughout the book.
But - what disturbed me was the fate of Easter. And yes, he may well have stolen a canoe and make it back to Dr Swenson as she confidently predicted but the Hummocca tribe knew where the Lakashi were because they had brought Easter to them before, were known to be very violent, and surely would have come and decimated the tribe in their fight to get Easter back if he did abscond? No one has mentioned this possibility on this thread that I have seen.
So I was left thinking that poor Easter was abandoned, confused and frightened, and, even if he did make it back, the Lakashi and Dr Swenson's work and lab would end up being attacked anyway. So all in all, I found it very disturbing end to the novel!
Like some others, I found the ending dissatisfying. I like to have loose ends tied up.
The other thing I didn't understand was why the malaria vaccine research was kept so secretive. I know that the research was only funded for the fertility drug but surely a company would be delighted to potentially develop an anti-malaria vaccine?
The 'State of Wonder' is the state I was left in at the end, wondering what was going to happen to all the characters!

How did they have a freezer in the jungle? What powered it? Was there a generator? No generator noise? When did they buy fuel?
but really, a freezer?
Did I miss something?


I lost all respect for Anders and Marina, too. We don't have to give in to all of our urges. After what happened with Easter, I did not want Marina to have a child.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
State of Wonder (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Heart of Darkness (other topics)State of Wonder (other topics)