Stephen King Fans discussion

This topic is about
It
IT Discussions
>
IT: Finished Reading IT - SPOILERS ALLOWED
message 51:
by
Dani
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Aug 18, 2011 06:53PM

reply
|
flag

i>
I didn't get the impression that ..."
Dani wrote: "-The part I didn't like was Bev having sex with all the boys. I just didn't get that part? I know to her it was a defiance against her father, but still... ;)
i>
I didn't get the impression that ..."
I understand what your saying. But not long before that her father/IT was chasing her about the house to check to see if she was still intact because she was hanging around all those boys. Throughout the book Bev is figuring out more and more about sex, and eventually it is her contribution to the whole group. They're all about 11 years old? I understand what your sayin', but I just couldn't quiet go for that part.











I had completely forgotten how quickly they all start to forget again. That really makes me sad, because you see how strong a friendship they had and I personally wish that could have continued.
I also understood a little more about the Turtle and the macroverse from reading The Dark Tower series. That turtle didn't make sense to me before, seemed kind of random. This reading of IT was the most satisfying experience. Will always be my favorite.
So...why did it kill Belch and Victor? Like, I know it is full of itself and thinks it's invincible or whatever, but why not wait until the Losers were dead before it turned on its dogsbodys?
For that matter, why kill Tom?
For that matter, why kill Tom?

Me, too. I think after all they went through together, lasting friendships would've been the least they deserved. And the idea of Bev and Ben getting together while the others forgot didn't feel balanced.
Ed209 wrote: "So...why did it kill Belch and Victor? For that matter, why kill Tom?"
I'd assumed that killing people was a way for It to feed. It preferred children, but It would take what It could get. So when someone made It angry or outlived their usefulness, it seemed like a two birds/one stone situation with killing them.

I have a couple of questions!
How come Audra came "back to life" during the ride on Silver?
Why was Pennywise also called 'Bob Gray'? What was the meaning/importance of that fact?
If all the ink and memories were slightly disappearing afterwards, how come the notes of Mike Hanlon made it into an unofficial 'book on the history of Derry'?
When did the romance from Beverly towards Ben started to bloom...I mean one moment she is romantically involved with (adult) Bill the next moment she takes of with (adult) Ben... When did that happen, did I miss something? I know Ben always fancied Bev...but the other way around?
Thanks!

Putting her on that bike took her back to a time when riding a bike meant being free and letting go of all of your cares and being fearless - childhood. It snapped her out of that trance.

I love IT(pun intended)! :)

I used to tell people that the this was my favorite movie, before I read the book. The book and the movie are worlds apart. I cant even believe he wrote some of the thing that are in this book. Some of it doesn't even seem possible to put into movie form.

IT was the book that made me a fan. And also the one that made me know I could read and epic book of more than 250-300 pages. I was so proud I even got through it. Now my copy is dogeared and torn up. I need a new one. I wish I could afford one of those special editions.
I'm excited for the new movie, though I wonder if the new pennywise will do it the justice Tim Curry did. I was sorry to learn to he had a stroke. He definitely deserved his lifetime achievement award. I've loved him in everything he's been in. He was such a good Pennywise!
I hope the new movie does the book justice. I know they are doing two movies. I can't wait to see what they do with it. I will go in with an open mind. As for the mini series. I thought the kid actors did a pretty job, but the adults, well, I thought the casting could have been better.

Also I did find that sex scene at the end to be a bit weird but easily forgettable.
Loved this book! It took me almost two months to read. Now onto The Dark Tower series!
Also who is Bob Gray?! They mention him in Dreamcatcher but who was he in It?!

Hollywood scriptwriters always try to make it more sensationalised. In reality it is a simple coming of age, good v evil book.
If it is to be two films follow the book to the letter. Not one from the kids perspective and then the other from the adults. It has to follow the book including flashbacks or it will just be a pile of doggie doo.
I loved Tim Curry as pennywise but equally the new one looks more menacing.


I finally read it over a long weekend at uni. My roommate had gone home but I'd stayed behind. I remember needing to use the bathroom and our dorm, being girls only, had open showers not unlike the gym shower scene in the IT film. I went to the bathroom as quickly as possible, ran from the bathroom as fast as I could, and vaulted into my lofted bed. As an young adult of 18.
It doesn't scare me much anymore, but Pennywise terrified me through too many of my years on Earth. I'm hopeful but wary about the reboot, though...

As a long book it doesn't really have any parts that just seem to drag forever. Lots of big books have this problem in my opinion.
I still don't understand the sex scene when they were kids.




I feel that the scene belongs and understand it's purpose. But I also get why people don't like it and it is a very, very weird scene. I think he could have done something different at this point to further the story without the thought of 11 year olds having sex. Something that would allow them to get back enough of the magic to get them out of the sewer.

I've also never really understood the mechanics. There is no way to put this without being crude, but can 11 year old boys actually begin, perform and finish the act of sex? A girl, I understand. It's gross, but there are deviants who want them as young as possible and it has nothing to do with them being physically ready. I really don't know if a boy that young can do it.
It's always bothered me. It is one of the few books by King I have not re-read over and over and this scene is why. I hate thinking about it coming up, I skip it, but then can't forget that it happened.

without going into too much detail the answer is yes. I asked my wife, the junior high teacher, and she immediately went into the story of a boy becoming a father at the age of 11.


I love finding those connections! That is one of the reasons why I love Stephen King.
Hi all, I finished reading IT a little while ago but only just recently jumped into the community on the site.
Everyone talks about "the scene" with Beverly at the end of the book, and with good reason because it is disturbing and an intriguing conversation for discussion.
I want everyone's opinions on a different part though that I feel is never discussed. As adults, Bill has an affair with Beverly with very little reluctance. He basically says, "Hmm I feel kinda bad cuz I'm married... oh well let's do it, Bev!" I was disappointed by Bill's decision here. He was supposed to be the mature, stalwart leader of the group, both as a child and as an adult. To give in like that felt incredibly out of character. Then, at the very end of the book, low and behold, Bill is back to caring so much about Audrey and Bev runs off with Ben. Do you think after the harrowing bike ride, Bill turned to Audrey and said, "Oh by the way, we have to talk about a little something..."?
It is just another clear example that Bev's only purpose in the story was to be a sexual object for the men. She can't have Bill so she settles for Ben instead. At least the scene as a child in the sewers restored some mystical power by transitioning the boys into adulthood... or something The affair with Bill felt more like simple lust.
Overall, I did like the book, but a lot of the concepts came off as trying too hard. In particular, the random condoned adultery and "the scene" were very off-putting.
Everyone talks about "the scene" with Beverly at the end of the book, and with good reason because it is disturbing and an intriguing conversation for discussion.
I want everyone's opinions on a different part though that I feel is never discussed. As adults, Bill has an affair with Beverly with very little reluctance. He basically says, "Hmm I feel kinda bad cuz I'm married... oh well let's do it, Bev!" I was disappointed by Bill's decision here. He was supposed to be the mature, stalwart leader of the group, both as a child and as an adult. To give in like that felt incredibly out of character. Then, at the very end of the book, low and behold, Bill is back to caring so much about Audrey and Bev runs off with Ben. Do you think after the harrowing bike ride, Bill turned to Audrey and said, "Oh by the way, we have to talk about a little something..."?
It is just another clear example that Bev's only purpose in the story was to be a sexual object for the men. She can't have Bill so she settles for Ben instead. At least the scene as a child in the sewers restored some mystical power by transitioning the boys into adulthood... or something The affair with Bill felt more like simple lust.
Overall, I did like the book, but a lot of the concepts came off as trying too hard. In particular, the random condoned adultery and "the scene" were very off-putting.

Everyone talks about "the scene" with Beverly at the end of the book, and with good r..."
I don't see Bev as a simple sex object either. I don't think Bill would have had an affair with anyone other than Bev, and while I am a wife and would have a hard time if Bill were my husband, I understood it in the story and didn't feel it was out of character at all. He had her and then was able to let her go.
I didn't see Bev as settling for Ben either. I really felt that Bev and Bill needed to get each other out of their system so they were able to move on.
I don't think a feature film is the correct forum for an epic story like IT. The story requires time to develop the concepts and show the character growth. I would have loved to see it as a Hulu or Netflix miniseries so it could be 6-10 hours and do the story justice.
That being said, I'm going to go see the movie and give it a fair chance to entertain me. Hopefully it is well made and enough people go to see it to have the second film made. If I can wait for the next A Song of Ice and Fire book after 5-6 years, I can wait for the conclusion to IT to hit the theaters.
That being said, I'm going to go see the movie and give it a fair chance to entertain me. Hopefully it is well made and enough people go to see it to have the second film made. If I can wait for the next A Song of Ice and Fire book after 5-6 years, I can wait for the conclusion to IT to hit the theaters.

I think if the first and second movie approaches 3 hours each then they can develop the story properly. The TV series was only 180 or so minutes.

How idealistic do you want to be here? In war (and this is like the ultimate war of good vs evil) shit happens, and in this case, it's adulterous... a terrible failing, but that's life... people are human and if they can move on as Bev and Bill do, it's part of the difficult but real parts of life. As Kandice says they had to get each other out of their systems. Bev and Ben have a good history too. As for the sex object idea, at least in a story, a sex object is someone who is only there to provide an attractive, even distracting sexy element to the story, nothing else. Bev is so much more than that. She, even more than Bill, is the critical person who holds this group together. I'd have to read it a fourth time to come up with a list of examples of when and how she does it, but THAT SCENE, is the least of it.

I don't think the series was great, but it was exciting to watch simply because it was a King adaptation. If you go into an adaptation expecting what you got from the book, you are looking for disappointment.
The Shining always comes up in these conversations. Kubrick's movie is magnificent, but it is not King's book. Like King says, his book will always be there. No adaptation, good, bad or completely different, will ever change that. Look at a movie as something new.



I'm really looking forward to watching and seeing what the screenwriter's and director's vision of King's It is.

So you leave, and there is an urge to look back, to look back just once as the sunset fades, to see that severe New England skyline one final time...Best not to look back. Best to believe that there will be happily ever afters all the way around - and so there may be; who is to say there will not be such endings? Not all boats which sail away into darkness never find the sun again, or the hand of another child; if life teaches anything at all, it teaches that there are so many happy endings that the man who believes there is no God needs his rationality called into serious question...So drive away quick, drive away while the last of the light slips away...drive away from Derry, from memory...but not from desire. That stays, the bright cameo of all we were and all we believed as children, all that shone in our eyes even when we were lost and the wind blew in the night. Drive away and try to keep smiling. Get a little rock and roll on the radio and go toward all the life there is with all the courage you can find and all the belief you can muster. Be true, be brave, stand. All the rest is darkness.
This book changed everything for me. I think I never looked at stories the same ever again. It is definitely a masterpiece. It has it all. Only King can write such a dark book and still be able to tell you things like this. For me, it is a book that I remember very well; I remember what I was doing while I was reading it, I remember the anxiety that caused me (in a good way, of course). It was just a great ride, one of the best ones I had with a book ever.
Of course, there's other kind of literature that I really enjoy, but there's something about this book, about Derry, about the characters, about the way that the story is told, that makes you feel part of it.
And don't get me started about the Turtle.
I just needed to say this. :)
Books mentioned in this topic
Mile 81 (other topics)The Bazaar of Bad Dreams (other topics)
It (other topics)
The Shining (other topics)
Hearts in Atlantis (other topics)