Cutting for Stone
discussion
Is it just me, or was this book thoroughly disappointing?
message 201:
by
Carey
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Nov 21, 2012 08:28AM

reply
|
flag

No it is not. The book was poorly edited, especially in the first half.



Mj, thank you for your thoughtful and clear comments. I had no intention to give offense. Cindy's comment sounded as though she was offended by my answer to the question put out to all in this Forum format. A question was asked, I wrote my comment in support of the book but also in support of the questioner who should not feel bad for not liking the book......if one doesn't connect with a book it is not a poor reflection on you or your intelligence. Now back to the question which Cindy never commented on and Mj thanks for your brilliant comments that remove any need for intimidation if someone joins in the discussion with a different point of view.



Instead, it felt like a meandering piece of literature that didn't know where it was going..."
I agree with you. In order to love a book I have to find a connection to the character, I could not do this with the book nor the story line. I found it odd and contrived


The book dragged on with words, words and more words that spiraled around without a clear path. I quit at page 59, and no I won't stick with a book because eventually it gets better. The first few chapters reminded me of being stuck at a party with that person that just won't shut up and takes forever to get to his point. Can't wait to get this back to the library.







☯Emily wrote: "Beth wrote: "It's just you..."
No it is not. The book was poorly edited, especially in the first half."

Lyn




Instead, it felt like a meandering piece of literature that didn't know where it was going..."
I'm so sorry Kiessa didn't enjoy "Cutting for Stone," which is one of my all-time top 50 books. Different strokes for different folks--I wrote a review (I'm listed as Dee Turner), for anyone interested in why I love it so much. Like others who've responded to Kiessa, I couldn't put it down. Although I read it just a couple of months ago, it's a story I hope to return to and reread in several years. This is the kind of book to measure your life's progress by, when returning to it after a while to see how your responses have changed or remained. I hope Kiessa returns to it someday.





I totally agree with you! One of my all time favorite books now!!!





I totally agree.
I did not think any of the characters were believable, especially the adoptive mother of the twins (whose name I forgot), who veered back and forth between Mother Theresa and Real Housewives of Addis Ababa. The only tolerable, sort of, parts for me occurred when somebody went in for surgery; I knew I'd be able to comfortably skim a lot of pages of material in which the author tells the reader "Hey look at me; I'm a surgeon and know all about this stuff! How cool am I!")


I so agree :-) Loved it. I've tried to get into his other books, but am still mourning CFS.

all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Cutting for Stone (other topics)
The Tennis Partner (other topics)
Map of the Invisible World (other topics)
A Fine Balance (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
Peace Like a River (other topics)Cutting for Stone (other topics)
The Tennis Partner (other topics)
Map of the Invisible World (other topics)
A Fine Balance (other topics)
More...