Cutting for Stone
discussion
Is it just me, or was this book thoroughly disappointing?

I agree, those two books had a similar melancholic flavor, but much better books. The very long descriptions of surgical procedures and medical problems were interesting but too frequent. I believe this book would be most interesting to someone with a medical background who may have a greater understanding and more interest in the medical descriptions. This is a good book, but A Fine Balance and This Much I Know is True are sensational books!!







Kerri, do yourself a favor and stick through it. If you do, it will be well worth it. I, too, didn't like the gory, operation parts (daughter, RN, didn't mind, of course) but the storyline evolves to become so readable and a learning experience for the reader.
If not, put it down and pick it up in a few years. Don't force yourself to read something you hate. I have Kindle and 28% isn't too far along. You'll make the right decision, I know you will. It didn't get all those five stars for nothing.


What I wanted to suggest about the question should I continue.....is to recommend that you have a look at the community ratings for this book.
There was a total of almost 86,000 ratings (pretty phenomenal in and of itself). Even more important to answering the question is that 46% or almost half rated the book 5 stars. 38% or almost 40% rated in 4 stars. Only 4% rated the book 2 stars or less. I think that's a pretty good indicator from many, many people that the book is well worth finishing.

I think ultimately it must be a great book, but none of this actually answers my question. I absolutely hate reading gore and am wondering if to enjoy the rest of the book do I have to suffer through more overly graphic medical procedures?

Sorry that I didn't understand you were most interested in an answer to - does the gore continue. I think it is worth reading the rest of Cuting for Stone because it is a great book and also because it is a slow starter. I just thought that 86,000 opinions would be better than my one single opinion.
As far as the gore, I read the book a while ago and can't remember if the last 70% was less gory. I think it was but I know for sure that it reads much more quickly and becomes difficult to put down. I was surprised that I enjoyed the medical information not being in that field. I really enjoyed the details but can understand why many other people were bored.
I don't remember it as being particularly gory - maybe because I was fascinated by learning about the diseases, medical procedures and surgeries common to the region and so different from where I live. I too hate gore and deliberately avoid books that use gore and violence that serve no purpose. I do however read a number of informational, historical fiction and memoir/autographical/biograpical books that sometimes include graphic details. However, the details serve a purpose - they are describing reality and therefore play an important part to reading and learning about the truth. That's how I considered the medical detail in Cutting for Stone.
If my memory serves me correctly, the latter 70% has a lot more character, relationship and plot development as opposed to medical details. The pace really picks up and I had a hard time putting it down.
It is a really great book and I'd suggest that you consider continuing.
Here's an idea...when you get to medical/gory parts, either skip them or speed read through them.....there is enough another stuff for a great read. I checked out "compare books" and our tastes are very similar for books we have read, for what it's worth. I also noticed that you've read all 3 Stieg Larsson books. If you could handle the gore in those books, you'll have no problem with the last 70% of Cutting for Stone.
But do what feels right for you. There are too many great books to suffer through a book you aren't enjoying. Let us all know how you make out.



I HONESTLY think you can do what I call a" light read" any of the technical medical stuff...It won't take much away from the story in this case. Having a medical background that part did not phase me, however; I have that problem when a great book has a boat load of political stuff...I "gloss-read" that stuff...and concentrate on characters and plot. Sadly, only began giving myself permission to read that way as I got older! Assuming EVERYONE is younger than me...don't wait to do that! You'll miss or struggle with a lot of great reads if you let your intrinsic interests be the only factor in choosing a book. By joining several reading groups after retirement, the opportunity to read a lot of books I never would have picked up taught me that was a worthwhile way to broaden my reading base. Stuff I'd have hated or struggled with which was SOO worth reading, I was able to both and enjoy discuss. Everyone does not need to get the same thing from a GOOD well written book
Best reads to you!
kaegea

My book club read the book and they were curious to know the medical accuracy. I assumed it was accurate as Dr. Vergase is a MD, but I asked another doctor friend of mine who is actually from Madras to read the book and give me his take on it. He thought the book was very accurate and noteworthy. I've commented way too many times already--so I'll shut up now. This is still a favorite for me.

I HONESTLY think you can do what I call a" light read" any of the technical medical stuff...It won't take much away from the story in this case. Having a medical background that part did..."
That is a great idea, there have been other books that I've put down as being what I call "too heavy" in parts, whether it be political, religious, medical procedures, whatever. I've always tried to read all of a book in case I miss something important, but I think I'm going to take up your suggestion from now on.
By the way, I'm 50% through Cutting for Stone now and enjoying it a lot more, but that first 30% was a real struggle for me.


I agree ... it took me awhile to get in to it ... but I loved it.

For people who have little or no medical knowledge (or even medical interest), I would imagine that the book could be rather gory or even boring at times. Much of this type of information is past the level of understanding of most lay persons.
I was elated to note the appearance of Thomas Starzl in the book. I met Dr Starzl when I was a new nurse working in a trauma center where organ donation was performed somewhat regularly and liver transplantation was quite the medical innovation.



Loved Cutting for Stone as well. Check out my review. I haven't read any other Verghese books "yet" but my friend did and loved his tennis book.
Check out the other discussion group below about other books like Cutting for Stone. You might find another similar book that you like just as much or almost as well
http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/8...


Same for me, I had no idea what it was about before I started, and totally enjoyed the whole thing.

True it had its flaws...some threads the author introduced but didn't follow through (..the strong sense of smell, e.g) some characters that started great but ended at being quiet 2 dimensional, the events at the end felt rushed...but it all paled in comparison to how vivid the story telling was. What a beautiful love story of Hema and Gosh, of the country and it's people, of the medical profession as art, gift and compassion.
Though I wouldn't compare it with Rohinton Mistry's A Fine Balance, a near perfect in its narration, but I won't put Cutting For Stone far beneath it either. Where Fine Balance in the end left me bereft of hope, Cutting for Stone was oddly very uplifting in its tone. A must read in my opinion :)

What a wonderful comment and book review. You should cut and paste your comment and put it into a review (I noticed you didn't do a formal review for Cutting for Stone) and share it with others. Your comments are that good and I'm sure would entice many others to read and enjoy it.

Instead, it felt like a meandering piece of literature that didn't know where it was going..."



Hey Shobha, The message about posting your comment as a review was from me MJ. I don't think reviews need to be unbiased. In fact that cannot be since we all have personal biases whether we are aware of them or not. Some of the best reviews on Goodreads are passionate. To me that's an indicator of the strength of a book - how it was able to touch and move someone. You should write more reviews. The ones I have read are terrific and well worth sharing.




You may not have the same experience but I tell you this so that you might consider reading a few more chapters and perhaps end up loving it just as much.


Good idea rather than completely abandoning. I find that sometimes you need to be in a certain mood for certain books. Sometimes they don't click but when you pick it up at another time, it completely resonates. Go figure.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Cutting for Stone (other topics)
The Tennis Partner (other topics)
Map of the Invisible World (other topics)
A Fine Balance (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
Peace Like a River (other topics)Cutting for Stone (other topics)
The Tennis Partner (other topics)
Map of the Invisible World (other topics)
A Fine Balance (other topics)
More...
Well stated!