Eclipse
discussion
Did any of you like the new Victoria or the old one was Better?
Rachelle Lefevre.In New Moon she was EXACTLY how I imagined her. I was sad that Bryce Dallas Howard got the part in the third movie.
i totally agree with you!
Me too. Rachelle Lefevre was so much better!
i hated the new victoria whenshe was playing in eclipse, her face was just like a too sweet type, rachelle Lefevre was perfect for it
Rachelle was so good, she didn't even have to say a word to portray pure evil in New Moon.Bryce had the right voice, true. But the hair! They put a red wig on a redhead! She looked like a red sheep!
Rachelle all the way; but you know Bryce Dallas was the original but she had scheduling conflicts and that's how Rachelle got the part.
Elaine wrote: "Rachelle all the way; but you know Bryce Dallas was the original but she had scheduling conflicts and that's how Rachelle got the part."Actually, they offered her the role in the beginning, but she turned it down because it was too small for her. She only liked the role once she got to be a "star" of the film, and knew that the series was a huge success.
http://www.twilightlexicon.com/2009/0...
Rachelle all the way. Bryce was all wrong for the part and that wig was ridiculous. You would think that with the amount of money the movies made they would be able to afford decent looking wigs.I know that the movies were a huge success and that is what matters to the studio anyway, but Twilight is one of the worst book to movies adaptation out there.
I liked the original, Rachelle. But I thought that Bryce did a good job with the part.No since in whining about it, can't do anything about it. : )
I don't care. But in Vampires Suck they paint it as a big tragedy.TEAM SCREW BELLA!
I wasn't wild. I added it as an afterthought.
Jo wrote: "I wasn't wild. I added it as an afterthought."sorry lol its funny though
Thanks. "She got--RECAST." That's a Vampires Suck quote.
I honestly think that Bryce Dallas Howard was better, because she looked a little sweet and in the the short second life of Bree tanner, Bree said Victorias voice was babyish. They are both really good Victorias though.
Though the voice and the look arnt really the same but.....
oohh come on you cant possibly say Bryce played victoria better then Rachelle! Bryce looked like an amatuer actor that they just stuck in because the better actor couldnt make it! Bryce was like an under-study to Rachelle everyone noticed who was the better actor. Rachelle was born for this part she has the hair the looks and just natural acting ability. Bryce on the other hand looked terrified of playing the part,and her acting seemed forced and she couldnt make me believe she was suppose to be the "original" victoria sorry Rachelle owned it! just my opinion....
Rachelle was sooo much better! She's prettier too!
i think i liked the old one best..more evil in her..
i like the old victoria better the new one has an annoying voice and doesnt have that evil thing going for her, the new victoria made her character completely unbelievable
Rachelle Lefevre All the way! Bryce Dallas Howard waas just so wrong for the part, too sweet and girly, and not even a great actress.
♥☆♫★♡ Kathy♡♥☆♫★ wrote: "Rachelle Lefevre All the way! Bryce Dallas Howard waas just so wrong for the part, too sweet and girly, and not even a great actress."So true!
Can anyone picture Bryce Dallas Howard saying "I'm the one with the wicked curve ball" in that same menacing tone that Lefevre captures in Twilight. It would've been a joke. Rachelle is Victoria. No doubt.
The old one was sooooo much better and prettier then the new one.
Definitely the first one.
Rachelle was the better Victoria.
100% Rachelle. Big mistake on their part for the recast!
Lindis wrote: "I liked the original, Rachelle. But I thought that Bryce did a good job with the part.No since in whining about it, can't do anything about it. : )"
And the character is dead now, in the films any way! ;-)
the original is so much better
Rachelle!!! It wasn't the same.
the old one... i was sooo mad they replaced her.. hate when movies do that.. it's really not the same.. like we can't tell u replaced a character.. smh
Hmm...I'm not sure. If you talk about the acting, then I really am NOT sure cuz I only watched Twilight and Eclipse, not New Moon, and Rachel-Victoria didn't act much...she didn't, right? Can't remember. Anwyays, I think rAchel looked better than the new one. :P XD
Well at first im was like "omg!" becuase im not the kind of person who dosent notice change. but i really dont care that much now shes not the biggest charecter anyway.
Rachelle Lefevre
Rachelle Lefevre i personally think she is just an all around better actress
Rachelle. She acts more violent, more mature, more badass, more evil, she looks so WILD there and this is how Victoria should look like, I think.
Kate wrote: "Rachelle Lefevre.In New Moon she was EXACTLY how I imagined her. I was sad that Bryce Dallas Howard got the part in the third movie."
i agree, Rachelle Lefevre is also how i imagined Victoria... =)
Bryce Dallas Howard i reckon she did just an okay job at victoria, but hell no she wasnt even at least close to being better than Rachelle Lefevre. I liked how Rachelle looked like exactly the way i pictured her in new moon, poor thing Harry died though
The old one was way better then the new one, I wonder why they got a new victoria any ways.
I liked the old one. She was way better and I wonder why did they ever change her.
she got replaced because of... i seem to have forgotten? look it up
Having a sweet face doesn't make Howard a bad Victoria, or not Victoria at all, it makes the evil worse. It's surprising and unexpected and ironic.
I heard Lafevre got replaced because of contract breach... I don't know, just a rumor. or Maybe if Howard was meant to be the original Victoria they decided to switch them around in Eclipse. or Scheduling conflicts-again.
I feel like I would have liked the first one better nomatter who it was. It is really hard to swich actor.
all discussions on this book |
post a new topic
or Rachelle Lefevre?