UK Book Club discussion
Your Reading Experience
>
Getting books - the changing face of publishing
date
newest »


However on that vein I'm not one for trying free chapters of books, the tasters I've tried are short stories from an author's collection or one written using the characters of a longer book designed to stand alone but still whet the appetite (as it were).
I think there's a way to make e-books/downloads available through GR itself but I'm not sure how that works, but that may also be worth looking into. After all books are our common passion on here :-)
Does that help?

The short story taster is a useful tip - but how does that actually reach a wider audience?
Its not the mechanisms for publishing or distributing books that's the problem. Its bringing the books to the attention of likely readers that's the problem.

I tend to gravitate towards free e-books so I'll try short stories and such like before buying the full version (for me preferably as Dead Tree versions). So my thought was that it may get readers to try genres/authors they haven't before, grab their interest and get them buying. I've discovered a fair few new authors this way and have only been on there for a little over a year.
The only other way I can think of is to make use of the GR giveaway scheme as I've found well over 200 books I want to get as a result of looking at (and entering) the competitions.

I'm w/the big smashwords' sale but opted out of free, but have a small token price as an author has to eat a few crumbs too. Will see where the sale takes them.
http://www.smashwords.com/books/searc...
plus The Timeless Counselor
But will do the condensed next time. So Mote it Be.
The Skye in June




http://www.amazon.com/b/?node=3059252011

Thank you for the Heads Up and the even better news is that all three of the Inner Space Murder Mystery Books are there.
How Cool is that ? Must be doing something right."
That is awesome.

Personally it worries me that authors feel that they should give their hard work away for nothing just to gain a few readers. If the author doesn't value their work, I can't see how they can expect potential readers to do so either. The joy of the e-book revolution is that the prices are sufficiently low for consumers to take a punt at an unknown author - in many cases they will be pleasantly surprised. Every writer starts as 'unknown' until their readership goes beyond 'friend of a friend'. Thereafter, it gets interesting.
Go on, try something new today!

Thanks for your comments. Tricky, isn't it? My point about reviews is a crucial one if we as authors are to persuade discerning consumers that independent authors are worth a go and, more importantly, worth paying to read our work.
Whilst laudible in it's initial conception, the star rating system can cause problems if a book receives a hatful of unqualified five star reviews given by fellow authors who are afraid that their peers 'will do unto them ....' if they dare give a lower rating. This tendancy to over-gild the lily not only potentially misleads consumers as to the likely quality of a book when we are are trying to entice them to buy and recommend our books, but it also runs the real risk of confirming in the consumer's mind what the traditional publishing world has always insinuated about independent authors, if indeed a book turns out to be significantly poorer than the ratings might suggest.
I don't know how to resolve these issues, but I do feel that if progress is to be made that we try to be as honest as we can whilst looking for the positives in each other's work. My way of dealing with it on e-bookmuncher.com (my recently launched e-book review site) is to score a book on its different aspects - title, cover image, blurb and content - so that the star rating has some tangibility. For example, five stars for me is 16/20 and over - 16 still being 20% short of perfection.
In terms of PR for the indie author, I think that authors should genuinely work much more closely together and use their collective creative ability to promote one book at a time. Realistically this can only be achieved within the confines of a specific committed and well organised group. I would be interested to garner some views on this to see how this might be workable, but fundamentally it strikes me that the only difference between authors managed by a publishing house and the indies is promotional muscle.


I think though, that publishers have a job to do - editing etc etc - you do trust in a book from a good publisher in terms of quality..but the content...I get through a book a week and come to the conclusion that publishers have, all too literally, lost the plot. Name writers are marketed. They all review each other. Dreadful books with sloppy plots and poor editing. So, roll on self-pubs provided they are quality and how you asses that I don't know..
Books mentioned in this topic
The Skye in June (other topics)Cloak of Magic (other topics)
Cloak of Magic (other topics)
Anyone got any good ideas they'd like to share with us poor beleaguered authors about how we might do it? This one-man-band approach isn't easy. I don't have a thick skin. I get upset by continual moaning about spamming and self-promotion, when there are no other ways left to get in touch with readers. Those of us who have to work for a living simply don't have time to engage in the discussions, much as I'd like to. I just want to be able to tell people about my books, so they can decide if they're interested or not. But posting to a "ghetto thread" just for self-promotion is not communicating anything!
S. A. Rule