Romance Readers Reading Challenges discussion
Archive (Buddy Reads)
>
Neverwhere [Buddy Read]
date
newest »


I checked your shelves, Caroline, and this appears to be your first book by Gaiman so I'm very interested to see what you think of not only this book, but of his writing as well. As I said, I really like his work but it's his graphic novels, particularly Sandman, that I love. His books have ranged from just ok to really good. I don't think I've found any of them amazing but they were all worth reading so far (with the exception of Sandman which was definitely in the amazing, 5+ stars range for me). The thing I love most about Gaiman is the way his descriptions give me a perfect picture in my head of what's going on, drawing me into this unique world that is still remarkably familiar. He makes me want to believe in magic and wish that it really could happen the way he says it does.
I've taken a small peak into Neverwhere (just the prologue - I don't want to get ahead, it's more fun with someone to share with!) and already he's got me hooked. There is a part where the main character, Richard, is talking to an old lady outside of a bar and it's a perfect example of why I love how he describes things:
"I was a dancer," said the old woman, and she tottered awkwardly around the sidewalk, humming tunelessly to herself. Then she teetered from side to side like a spinning top coming to rest, and finally she stopped, facing Richard."
I can't help but get a mental image of this strange old lady dancing and, with these 2 sentences, he's managed to make his character more interesting to me than some authors have done with an entire book!

Also the prologue takes on a whole new meaning when you know the name of the heroine - (view spoiler) . There's quite a bit of foreshadowing going on!



The Graveyard book was one of my just ok reads. It felt a little too unfinished to me, like he roughed out the story but never really got around to filling in the details. Still a good read for what it was - a children's story about ghosts, ghouls and a little boy, but not the best of the genre. I know others have loved it though so maybe I was just expecting too much.



I'll let Sara do the honours as I don't know what her state of reading is at the mo! Great to have you along with us Kerste:-) xx





I'm finishing up a book at the moment (6:45 pm PT), then I'll pick up Neverwhere and start in.
Check in with you gals soon!

I can kind of see why people compare it to The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, there are parts were the humour and descriptive technique are very reminiscent of Douglas Adams, but it also feels a little forced at times. I don't know if he's just finding his voice, obviously Adams would have some influence on his writing, but his later novels seem to have a different tone and better flow. The one part that really stands out to me for this was were he's describing the bad guys, Croup and Vandemar:
"There are four simple ways for the observant to tell Mr. Croup and Mr. Vandemar apart: first, Mr. Vandemar is two and a half heads taller than Mr. Croup; second, Mr. Croup has eyes of a faded china blue, while Mr. Vandemar's eyes are brown; third, while Mr. Vandemar fashioned the rings he wears on his right hand out of the skulls of four ravens, Mr. Croup has no obvious jewelery; fourth, Mr. Croup likes words, while Mr. Vandemar is always hungry. Also, they look nothing at all alike."
It just felt like he was trying too hard to be clever.
As I mentioned before, I'm a huge fan of Gaiman's graphic novels, and that seems to be the majority of what he was writing at this time. I think that's why he seems to be so good at creating a mental image without a lot of words - you'd have to have a good grasp of the visual you're trying to portray while creating a graphic novel, not only for the illustrator but for the reader as well, since you have to fit a whole lot of description into a few fairly sparse pictures. If you don't the graphic novels are hard to follow and confusing (there are quite a few out there that illustrate this point!!!).
One of my favourite parts so far is when Richard meets the marquis whom he had mistaken for a pile of rags. It reminded me of a scene from my favourite movie, Labyrinth, which I think has a similar feel to it as this book.
Jareth undercover
The show's introduction to the marquis was a little disappointing. In the book "what Richard had taken for a pile of rags unfolded, expanded, stood up in one fluid motion.". I wish they had taken a cue from the genius Jim Henson (a slight bias :) and done a little more with it but instead of having him rise from the rags, they cut from the rags to Richard and when they cut back, he's just standing there. Would it really have been that hard to have him throw off some rags!?!
Lame!
A couple lines I liked:
"Richard had noticed that events were cowards: they didn't occur singly, but instead they would run in packs and leap out at him all at once."
"I suppose you could call them men, yes. Two legs, two arms, a head each."
Makes you wonder what they really are...
Also (view spoiler)

I love magiky style bools like this, and only living 16 miles outside of London myself am loving and learning new things about the city as well as laughing at landmarks used for things! What an imagination this guy has! I love the way he descrbes things so you can really get the feeling, like when Richard is crossing the nights bridge
'With each step they took the light of the candle became dimmer. He realised the same thing was happening to the leather womans flashlight. It felt not so much as if the lights were being turned down, but as if the darkness where being turned up.'.....

(view spoiler)
x x

Aside from Gaiman's Sandman graphic novels, this is my favourite of his books (well, so far anyway).
I also love the way that places take on a new meaning or become a character in London below, I just wish I new these landmarks better; I think some of it might be going right over my head. I'm reading both the paper and e-book since the paperback has a handy map of the London transit system that helps. I think I read somewhere that they published a revised edition to make it more North American friendly so I wonder what the original was like and if your reading a different version than me or not.
I've started watching Neverwhere and it's almost exactly like the book so, since you liked it so much, I think you'd like this too. It's a little cheesy but in a good, almost Doctor Who, sort of way. I've only watched the first episode so far though so I can't say much for the whole thing, just the little I've seen. I can see why it's gotten flack for the visual but I think you watch something like this to be entertained, not amazed, so I'm not disappointed. It's definitely amusing, especially the dialogue, and it helps me to not completely butcher the pronunciation of the names of places! :)
I haven't read your spoiler yet, I'm waiting until I finish reading the book which should be in the next day or two.

I have the 2000 edition of the book i do believe! I concur with all you've said. I think I will watch the series sounds great and i'm a big Dr Who fan so even better! Enjoy the rest of the book x x




For anyone else who happens to read this post here's were the spoilers begin!
The bit with the old lady seemed a little off to me though. He mentioned her dirty, once white umbrella, leading me to believe she was the same one at the start of the book but her responses didn't fit the way she acted in the beginning. Just made me wonder...
I was also surprised by Hunter's death - it was so abrupt! I expected her to put up more of a fight and beat the beast! I loved the part with Serpentine afterwards though. It left me not sure how to feel about her death; it was less sad and instead more stoic and mysterious. I thought it was a fitting end for her.
Also, what was up with the feather from Old Bailey? It didn't seem to do much but he did drop it in the gutter by where de Carabas ends up showing up for him so was it his carving a door and banging on the wall that called him or the feather that disappeared out of the gutter? Did the feather just make him realize he wasn't ready to let go of his underground life?
As for Islington, I had my suspicions about him only because de Carabas is described as a con man so I saw him as opportunistic rather then as a bad guy. Islington, on the other hand, was hinted at a lot but not really explained so I figured there had to be a lot more to that part of the story. S/he was the only one that made sense to scare Croup and Vandemar enough for their comments about their employer to make sense; they didn't seem to care about much else and were too evil for any of the other major players in the underworld to be intimidating enough. I was very surprised that Hunter was in league with them though - I forgot about the hint that they had a rat in there midst (and not the good kind).
Books mentioned in this topic
Hearts in Atlantis (other topics)The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy in Five Parts (other topics)
Neverwhere (other topics)
The Graveyard Book (other topics)
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (other topics)
More...
Anyone who would like to join us is more than welcome but be warned that I am a fan of Gaiman and am prone to rambling about things I like.