Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Policies & Practices
>
NAB
date
newest »


Oh and these* NABs just appeared and don't look right to me.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10...
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10...
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11...
*Edit (and they are all from the same author)

Librarian Edits for The Mud Queen
(showing 1-5 of 5)
all editions | this edition
Robin Brande
Robin Brande updated the book The Mud Queen by NOT A BOOK
author: Robin Brande to NOT A BOOK
1 hour, 30 min ago (#7652896)
The Mud Queen by NOT A BOOK

and the first one is still available on Amazon. I'm going to defer to rivka on this one. Sounds like the author should be contacted.
After reading her blog it looks like it's some sort of bad blood between the author and the publisher.
Another case of an author thinking about Goodreads as a bookstore rather than a library.


Another question about journals/calendars. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/42...
Would that one have enough text to keep as a book? The whole journal/calendar thing confuses me.

And it really doesn't matter if it is still for sale. If it was ever in circulation it should be listed.

Another question about journals/calendars. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/42......"
I ask myself would I buy this book/nab just to read the text? If so, it's a book. If not, it's a journal/calendar/whatever with some text added for interest.

And the one I linked has book reviews. I guess someone might really buy it for the book reviews.

And the one I linked has book reviews. I guess someone might really buy it for the book reviews."
How do you know it has book reviews? I suspect it doesn't.


"The New York Review of Books 2009 Desk Diary features fifty-three of Dominique Nabokov’s black-and-white photographs of novelists, poets, and playwrights whose works have been reviewed by or who themselves have written for The New York Review of Books. This collection of author portraits includes Seamus Heaney, John Ashbery, Joan Didion, Italo Calvino, Marguerite Duras, Czeslaw Milosz, and dozens of other international literary luminaries. Each portrait is accompanied by quotation by or about the writer that has appeared in The New York Review of Books."

I hate the whole coloring book, paper doll, stickers, journal, baby book, calendar thing. But it's not my game.
Yes - i'm sure I'm responsible for many a puzzle book.

(EDIT)Literal interpretation of the rules just doesn't always lead to a sensible solution.
But it is such a pain in the rear to be criticised that I have largely quite messing with coloring books, puzzle books and so on.
I'll go halvsies on it with you LG. How about it? :)
cheers

However, I don't quite understand the logic behind calling a coloring book a NAB, but not a puzzle book. They're both non-reading activities for children.
Puzzle books have things like crossword puzzles, wordfinds, etc. I disagree with calling those "non-reading activities".
Fixed the Brande books.
Fixed the Brande books.

Won't touch coloring books with a stick, too much varying opinion. Rules changes don't help either. And really,in the great scheme of events, how important is it?
Well, yes Rivka, you have to read puzzles and so on. But I don't think that's the same as reading a book..with a plot or a point if nonfiction.
But again, not touching those either. Life's too short to get into arguments over things which aren't relevant to life and happiness, so to speak.


I know. That's why, maybe, coloring books should be the kind of thing that people shouldn't "touch" (NAB) unless they can verify it with an actual copy.


Comic books that have an ISBN or ASIN should be left as not-NAB. Ones that don't can be deleted. In neither case would NABing be necessary.
Calendars are usually correct NABed. Sorry, which one were you asking about again?
Calendars are usually correct NABed. Sorry, which one were you asking about again?

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/42...
that's the journal and the calendar
http://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/1...
Brande has put her books back in the NAB list
And this is an example of the comics that I'm asking about
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/20...
Is there any reason to think that calendar or journal have significant blocks of text? Otherwise I think NAB is correct.
Bah. Brande's books now have Notes and correct author.
That comic sure looks bound to me. I don't think it should be NAB.
Bah. Brande's books now have Notes and correct author.
That comic sure looks bound to me. I don't think it should be NAB.

"The New York Review of Books 2009 Desk Diary features fifty-three of Dominique Nabokov’s black-and-white photographs of novelists, poets, and playwrights whose works have been reviewed by or who themselves have written for The New York Review of Books. This collection of author portraits includes Seamus Heaney, John Ashbery, Joan Didion, Italo Calvino, Marguerite Duras, Czeslaw Milosz, and dozens of other international literary luminaries. Each portrait is accompanied by quotation by or about the writer that has appeared in The New York Review of Books."
That's definitely an edge case. I lean slightly towards un-NABing -- that's a fairly substantial amount of content, I think.



http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22...