Terminalcoffee discussion
Rants / Debates (Serious)
>
Are the color pink and all its implications bad for girls?

I also think about all these little girls brought up to think of themselves as princesses -- just how much coddling are they going to expect as adults? I shudder to think of the day when princesses are running the world.

In her interview she said since kids at an early age don't know what really differentiates a boy from a girl so girls want to assert their gender and the whole pink-and-fluffy exterior helps them do just that.
I think that's nonsense. All I wanted as a kid was good quality time with my parents, yummy food and avoid the icky, and to never be bored. I didn't care if my pajamas were pink or green or if my pancakes were pirate pancakes or princess pancakes.
I think it's the parents that push these gender stereotypes on the children and kids are influenced by it.




Oh! And like, when you get Happy Meals from McDonalds, they ask you "for a girl or for a boy?" That always pisses me off!

My friend wore a pale pink dress shirt to his medical boards because he heard it's supposed to be a comforting color.

I'd have to agree on that point. I've read that in all the lit about how colors affect mood.


Frankly, I think the book is over the top. Women and men are different, no matter how you slice it, we're different. I don't think any harm comes from accepting that difference. What I think is harmful is when others buy into the concept that different means inferior or superior. The author of that article's line of thinking is skewed. Why does playing with pink toys have to be blamed as the culprit for what divides her? That’s crap. What divides her is her physical, chemical makeup, not her preference in toys or their color. Why can't women just embrace their womanhood? I work with men, but you don't see me coming in to work in pants suits, ties and loafers. I wear skirts, heels, and carrry a pink purse to work. That's how I roll. It doesn't make me less, anymore than their preferences make them more.

That's not to say that society doesn’t tend to push them in a certain direction. While shopping for my son before he was born I noticed the abundance of pink pretty clothes in all kinds of styles. The section for girls was twice the size of the boys. It annoyed me to no end. Now when going down the isles of toys you can tell the boys and girls sections apart by the abundance again of pink.


My daughter was always provided toys of all kinds (dolls AND dinky cars), and lots of colors to choose from. Turns out she's just a girly-girl, and she came to that all on her own."
And I got Jake a nice doll when he was baby. He used it as a bashing machine. And at 9 months was pointing bananas like a gun. This is a baby who was only exposed to PBS young kiddie shows. He sure did love his kitchen tho!
Starting in my teens I stayed away from pink due to all the reasons listed above. But when I hit 40, I suddenly realized I loved pink, and it looked good on me! It felt wonderful to embrace my pinkness.
Until I had a kid, I was sure everything was nurture. Now I think there's nature in there too.
But I read a story yesterday that Disney is now visiting moms of newborns who just gave birth and giving them a free onesie. They're boasting about what a great marketing ploy this is, and specifically cited getting in on the market immediately for all their future princesses. UGH.
I don't even like the idea of this topic.
No. The color I dress my girl in is not bad. In any way.
No. The color I dress my girl in is not bad. In any way.

Frankly, I think the book is over the top. Women and men are different, no matter how you slice it, we're different. I don't think any harm comes from accepting that difference. What I think is harmful is when others buy into the concept that different means inferior or superior. The author of that article's line of thinking is skewed. Why does playing with pink toys have to be blamed as the culprit for what divides her? That’s crap. What divides her is her physical, chemical makeup, not her preference in toys or their color. Why can't women just embrace their womanhood? I work with men, but you don't see me coming in to work in pants suits, ties and loafers. I wear skirts, heels, and carrry a pink purse to work. That's how I roll. It doesn't make me less, anymore than their preferences make them more."
This, exactly. And while we're on the topic, I personally think that such "reality" shows as Bridezilla, Bad Girls Club, My SuperSweet 16, etc., are much more harmful and degrading to girls than dressing them in pink and giving them dollbabiess to play with.

There's always been pressure for girls to be pretty, I don't see this as anything new, or worse, as much as I hate the Disney marketing machine.
Personally, I rejected pink early on, and all that went with it. I was not whatever that represented, I was serious, I liked to read. I was no one's princess.
My favorite color was blue, then green. And now, it's aqua.

In gender -
* In Western culture, the practice of assigning pink to an individual gender began in the 1920s or earlier. From then until the 1940s, pink was considered appropriate for boys because being related to red it was the more masculine and decided color, while blue was considered appropriate for girls because it was the more delicate and dainty color, or related to the Virgin Mary. Since the 1940s, the societal norm was inverted; pink became considered appropriate for girls and blue appropriate for boys, a practice that has continued into the 21st century.
* Though the color pink has sometimes been associated with negative gender stereotypes, some feminists have sought to 'reclaim' it. For example, the Swedish radical feminist party Feminist Initiative and the American activist women's group Code Pink: Women for Peace use pink as their color.
* The pink ribbon is the international symbol of breast cancer awareness. Pink was chosen partially because it is so strongly associated with femininity.
* It has been suggested that females prefer pink because of a preference for reddish things like ripe fruits and healthy faces, but the associated study has been criticized as "bad science".
* The phrase "pink-collar worker" refers, in the West, to persons working in fields or jobs conventionally regarded as "women's work".
In sexuality -
* Whereas Jewish people were forced to wear a yellow star of David under Nazi rule, and Roma people were forced to wear a black triangle, men imprisoned on accusations of homosexuality or same-sex sexual activity were forced to wear a pink triangle. Nowadays, a pink triangle (sometimes pointing up, contrary to Nazi usage) is often worn with pride.
* A Dutch newsgroup about homosexuality is called nl.roze (roze being the Dutch word for pink), while in Britain, Pink News is a leading gay newspaper and online news service. There is a magazine called Pink for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual (LGBT) community which has different editions for various metropolitan areas. In France Pink TV is an LGBT cable channel.
* In business, the pink pound or pink dollar refers to the spending power of the LGBT community.Advertising agencies sometimes call the gay market the pink economy.
* Though long discontinued, the now mainstream gay-oriented magazine The Advocate for many years of its early history featured a sometimes sizable section of personal ads and mostly sexually-oriented ads printed on pink paper and referred to as "the pink pages." As the gay rights movement gained increased mainstream momentum and public acceptance, and as the magazine itself became less underground and was distributed more widely on newsstands in "middle America," the publishers made the section more easily removable for those who preferred not to view/keep it with the main body of the magazine, and The Advocate eventually ceased to include the "pink pages" at all.
* In Japan the color cherry blossom pink is associated with the vagina, and therefore, in Japan, softcore pornographic films are called pink movies.

As for the periods inside quote marks, I swear I was taught to do it that way. I even used to proofread and that was a rule. Don't have time now, but I'm going to research that to see it the rule changed, or if I'm completely full of wrong info!
Janice, I'm not a pastel girl myself either, pretty much in any color, jewel tones are my thing.

So...what are you saying, that girls/women who like pink aren't "serious"? The color pink doesn't have to "represent" anything, but if people continue to interpret it as meaning "frivolous, girly, princess who isn't serious and doesn't like to read" then that's just continuing the harmful stereotype. I'll wear pink if I want to and if others think I'm "representing" some stupid stereotype then fuck 'em.

And, I just don't like pink. I say, if you like pink, wear it! Be serious, be frivolous, be you, whoever you are. Transcend that stereotype. :)

Why are disney princesses getting a bad rap? Belle read books, was thought of as intelligent, had it not been for her, the beast would never have returned to his manly state, she saved his kingdom. Notice that was a female doing the rescuing. Same with the little mermaid, she saved prince eric along with her little fishy friends. I'm out of princesses at the moment, but why is it that them being pretty is the only thing anyone talks about? They were pretty kick a$$ too, imo, and not because they were pretty. I wanted to be the little mermaid because she sang well. That would have been true if she had been average looking. I swear, women are women's worst enemy, not men. We are so hellbent on judging each others choices that we can't respect the fact that now we actually have choices to make. Good lord, it makes me crazy.

Heidi wrote: "It irks me that they put the periods outside the quotation marks."
They do it both ways in that article.
Sweeter is a copy editor by trade and I told him about my passion for "always in" and he says without hesitation "not always" but also can't cite a rule. So I've learned to let it go.
They do it both ways in that article.
Sweeter is a copy editor by trade and I told him about my passion for "always in" and he says without hesitation "not always" but also can't cite a rule. So I've learned to let it go.

That doesn't make them OK.

It's not easy being a girl in this culture.

But aren't men just as guilty of this? Men like to be thought of as attractive, just as women do. Men work on their outward appearance, it isn't just a woman's desire. Everyone wants to feel attractive, male or female.

As a child I was definitely a purple girl... and then I went through my orange phase... I even picked my favorite Baskin Robbins flavors to match my favorite colors (grape ice and orange sherbet when they didn't have grape ice)... and then peach... and as an adult, it was claret red... and white... and now turquoise. And also taupe. :)
Pink's not my favorite, but I do like it.


This is true. We're held to a different standard not just by men, though. I think women are the harshest critics of other women in most cases.

And how much of that, do you think, is wanting to be accepted by other women as a peer? Because I'm willing to bet there's more of this going on than vying for acceptance of other men.

But then again, maybe not so much like a guy because I'm going off how their faces look. I'm a face person though, so someone can be a little too thin or a little too heavy and I will ignore that and look at their face.
Ages 5-7 are severe gender identification years for children, more so than before or after. They have an enormous need to identify as girl or boy, and there is strong peer reinforcement, so that boys who want to play with dolls are told by their peers that they need to play with boy-appropriate toys, and vice versa.
(Anyway, so I'm told. I don't remember this, myself. I didn't like pink any more than any other color, and I wanted to play with Legos and Matchbox cars and Lincoln Logs at least as much if not more than dolls.)
Companies like Disney discovered this about little girls - the pink, the fairy/princess thing, and exploited the shit out of it. (This is part of Orenstein's book.) So the stores are full of pink princessy ballerina products. If they weren't, girls would wear other colors and styles of clothing. Companies like American Girl are exploiting the hell out of the whole doll thing.
If you want a better book on gender, I suggest
Delusions of Gender.
(Anyway, so I'm told. I don't remember this, myself. I didn't like pink any more than any other color, and I wanted to play with Legos and Matchbox cars and Lincoln Logs at least as much if not more than dolls.)
Companies like Disney discovered this about little girls - the pink, the fairy/princess thing, and exploited the shit out of it. (This is part of Orenstein's book.) So the stores are full of pink princessy ballerina products. If they weren't, girls would wear other colors and styles of clothing. Companies like American Girl are exploiting the hell out of the whole doll thing.
If you want a better book on gender, I suggest
Delusions of Gender.


As for me I was the tomboy dressed in reds and pinks. :D
BTW here's that article on Disney marketing to the fresh out of hatch baby mommas. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Disney-...

I agree, Bun, but as I get older the opposite has happened and I sometimes have to stop myself - you're going out in THAT??? Ya know, like shopping after I've traipsed thru the mud in my sweats with the dawg. I do go shopping, but I've developed such disregard I'm afraid when I'm in my 70s I'll be going in my bathrobe and slippers!




Hi, Knarik! Good to see you. Are you stating that last line as fact? Cause I have to disagree with that one big time, but I'm not entirely sure I understand what you're saying in the last couple of sentences.


But an overemphasis on pink can eventually be harmful, Orenstein says. "Those little differences that are innate to boys and girls, if they're allowed to flourish by having kids grow up in separate cultures, become big gaps.
"When your daughter is sitting there in her room, with her pink princess dress and her pink Scrabble kit … and her pink Magic 8-Ball, it just makes those divisions so much bigger and so much harder to cross."
http://www.npr.org/2011/02/05/1334716...
Overkill? False alarm? Crazyass author trying to sell books? Right on target? What do you think?
(I'm not sure whether to put in serious or non-serious faceoffs...let's go with...serious, but be unserious if you'd like.)