Terminalcoffee discussion
Sharing Time:
>
I am worried that I can't follow the discussion in the Reagan thread.
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Sally, la reina
(new)
Feb 07, 2011 07:45PM
Mod
reply
|
flag
This is somewhat paradoxical on a website devoted to the reading of books. However, I myself find that once an individual post goes beyond three longish paragraphs I wish the author had separated it into smaller posts.
I do welcome the starting of serious threads (political, bookish) when it seems like 80% of all threads have to do with pop culture.
Yes, I do to. I just feel like it is a corner of the virtual coffee shop we all inhabit where I tiptoe through, avoiding eye contact like no other.
Sally, I didn't even bother to open the thread.
I'd like to see that Celine Dion gif."I think I've got a crush on Celine Dion
The way she beats her chest when she sings a love song...
She'll sing a song in English, then she'll sing en francaise
both the songs will suck, but I love her anyway"
Carol wrote:
"I think I've got a crush on Celine Dion
The way she beats her chest when she sings a love song...
She'll sing a song in English, then she'll sing en francais..."
I seriously read this right as "Sweet Child of Mine" played on the stereo and I couldn't not read it to that tune.
"I think I've got a crush on Celine Dion
The way she beats her chest when she sings a love song...
She'll sing a song in English, then she'll sing en francais..."
I seriously read this right as "Sweet Child of Mine" played on the stereo and I couldn't not read it to that tune.
I'm glad for all sorts of posts/threads, but I read them differently, sure, at different times. The very slippery internet slope of "long posts = arguments starting" is instrinsically understood by just about all of us, I think, and if I see a slew of long posts I assume an argument is taking place. Very rarely do I want to argue on the internet, esp. if it's with the same person over and over again. I don't have fun with that...some people do, you know? Some people like the argument. I don't mean that as a criticism. I like puppies and cookies. They like arguments. Knock yourself out.If things are too serious, yes, I agree, start a lighter thread, and if things are too light, yes, start a serious thread. We can use them all.
Sally wrote: "I'm glad. I can't figure out how to change moderator titles right now."
Is "the cool one" a moderator title? I've wondered why some people have extra stuff after their names.
The Reagan thread is just too much work. If a post goes on for more than a page, I feel like I'm getting ranted at, instead of there being a discussion going on with give and take.
Sally, first and foremost, your brain is mush, as it should be, because you have a baby. Your brain might not come back until Leah is in K, and yet you might very well have another baby. Forget about trying to concentrate and focus on intellectual conversation, unless it involves poop, schools, the playground, what Leah ate, etc. That's a ton of stuff right there!I didn't go into the Reagan thread either. (aside from the fact that I'm back after a leave of absence from GR, sure wish I could claim I accomplished something!) I already know what I know, and nobody is going to change my mind. And I don't want to get all riled up! Sometimes I'm in the mood, sometimes not. Right now I'm focused on Egypt. Say nobody has started an Egypt thread!
Lori wrote: "Sally, first and foremost, your brain is mush, as it should be, because you have a baby. "
Uh...
Uh...
A friend of mine has a theory that 80% of our brains are contained in the placenta. You lose it giving birth...
Yep. It doesn't pay to have too many.





