The Next Best Book Club discussion
Revive a Dead Thread
>
When do you stop reading?


Okay, sorry, get back on track. Ahem.

But enough already - I'm on to Deepak Chopra's Buddha!

Ken, this will be my first foray into anything Buddha - which I'm embarassed to admit since Buddhism is alive and well here in Malaysia...


Congrats Kat, you amaze me. Did it get any better for you, or was it torturous the whole time?
Ken, and everyone else, I guess I am just an optimist when it comes to the people who post here. I have been known to be wrong and give the wrong people second chances.
I will ask that you all continue to act the way you have, and call out any shady or agressive posters, as I cant be on here 24/7. Thank you for your help here, and seeing as how he hasnt posted back, I think we can all breath a bit easier. If he pops back up again, he will have to deal with me and my quick fingers!!
Thanks again!
Ken, and everyone else, I guess I am just an optimist when it comes to the people who post here. I have been known to be wrong and give the wrong people second chances.
I will ask that you all continue to act the way you have, and call out any shady or agressive posters, as I cant be on here 24/7. Thank you for your help here, and seeing as how he hasnt posted back, I think we can all breath a bit easier. If he pops back up again, he will have to deal with me and my quick fingers!!
Thanks again!


And Congrats Kataklicik! Here's hoping that a little distance from the book will offer a bit of perspective on some of the book's better qualities (yes, it does have some).

PS Thanks for butting in - the topic needed to be broken!

Arminius, I too almost never give up on a book, in the hope that it'll get better. I mean, someone's put their blood, sweat and tears into the story, didn't they? But sometimes it just doesn't. The sad thing is, after finishing Catch-22, I'm almost certain I'll never read any other book by Joseph Heller, ever.
I'm halfway thru Chopra's Buddha, Liz. It feels good to be 'reading' again, and not frantically restraining myself from gouging my eyes out...

Funny, that was about the only thing I got out of the 40 some odd pages I read of that book. I thought it was quite chucklicous. That and the fact that his friend had to be crazy to fly the plane, but if you thought you were crazy and went to see a dr, then you were deemed sane, so you had to fly.... (???)

In response to: I too almost never give up on a book, in the hope that it'll get better. I mean, someone's put their blood, sweat and tears into the story, didn't they?
I admire your willingness to stick with an author through his/her backbreaking work You must be the eternal optimist. And, to play the eternal cynic, just cause they put their blood, sweat, and tears into the story doesn't mean I have to, too, does it? ;-)


But it was a challenge I needed to meet! Yes, yes, my personal OCD definitely :)


I used to hate leaving a book part-way through but, now, I figure: There's so many books out there that I actually want to read; why should I waste my time on one I don't?
I tend to take a lot of time picking my books out in the first place. So, fortunately, I don't tend to end up with too many that I can't finish. I usually read the synopsis and the first chapter in the bookstore before I decide to buy it.
If it doesn't grab me in the first chapter, it gets put back on the shelf.

And the other notable one is "Uncle Tom's Cabin" which is not so lengthy, but has too many slave talk for my comprehension. I can barely understand what the main character is saying *lol*

Interesting that you read the first chapter in the bookstore. Nice way of weeding out the trash before you bring it home!

The beauty with GR is that if people who's reading you compare with have rated a book very high, you might want to take a second look at the title to find the same enjoyment.

Beth, if you see this: I could barely put it down last night...
Peace!

Or if I would NOT recommend it to anyone - that's a "here's your sign" too.
:)


Don't sweat it. Ideally, if people didn't like what you had to recommend, I would hope they would stop reading, too.
Or, you could send out "I'm Sorry" letters to everyone you think you might have recommended the book to, on the off chance they may have tried it and didn't like it! ;-)

I usually give books 100 pages before I give up on them.
If a friend reccomended it to me, I usually try to finish it.
But life is too short to be spending time on books I don't enjoy.

But has it crossed anyone's mind that if we don't finish a book, we can't give it a proper review? And then the book ends up with effusive reviews by those who actually liked it!
And we read the review, be mislead, go out and buy the book, only to chuck it out later.... :)
The pros and the cons to finishing a book I guess. But there are books out there that just escape me - Tolkien's the Silmarillion for example. I couldn't get past the first couple of pages even!!



Some authors don't understand that the hook is what's important because they are gonna run into busy readers like me who want things to take off the ground before the middle of the book, LOL. I am way too busy to sit around with a book that's not holding my attention so I toss it aside around the third chapter (sometimes sooner if I don't like the author's style or if it's just too boring). I make acceptions for Kay Hooper and Linda Howard because these are my favorite authors so even if I find a book from them to not be that good, they are hardly ever draggy.
It's the draggy, boring books with the endless narration that I just can't stand. I'm like "Get on with this already! Life is too short!" LOL, hey I am an author and I am very busy. Maybe if I had more time I'd be more patient but I don't have patience for boring or draggy movies either so that's just the way I am. I like things to get started and I don't like books with filler that's not needed.
What turns me off the most is when a book starts when the character's a child and you know the character will end up 40 before you finish. It's like, "Oh, goodness, look at all this long, drawn out stuff I'll have to read." If the book is long it better definitely be interesting or I'll put that sucker down after ten pages. And I do not feel guilty about that. I just move on, LOL. You can tell when a book will improve or not and if a book starts out slow it usually stays that way.
By the way, head over to my page and read a sample of my first chapter of Melody and you'll see what I mean by trying to find the best possible hook to gain interest in the story. Also, I'd love it if some of you take a look if you like mysteries and thrillers.
When I write my books I think of how I would feel reading it, and that helps me. I get rid of as much filler as possible. Filler is stuff you do not need in a story and most books these days are forty-fifty percent filler. But if the book's good, oh I'm gonna finish it, LOL.
Best Wishes!



Just plain bad (as opposed to gratingly bad), I will finish. So I waded through Jerzy Kosinski's Being There and Hemingway's To Have and Have Not. I think you have to soldier through these things so that you can have an informed opinion of their worthlessness.
And then there are books that didn't grab me the first time through, but that I loved on re-reading. McGuane's Nobody's Angel and The Great Gatsby were like that for me.


i tend to be very masoquistic when I start a book its very hard to quit. I'm more then halfway throw this one, but I'm just done whit it. I'm in a very bad mood today and a bit depressed - I think that helped me whit this decision. Its a book I've got trow bookcrossing and it was perfect for the "read a book by an asian or asian descent" task on the fall challenge. but argh!


basicly its work related stress thats getting me down. hopefully I'll chear up during the weekend

Books mentioned in this topic
Breaking Dawn (other topics)Avempartha (other topics)
"Top Readers Should Actually Have READ the Books" thread (Goodreads Feedback Group)