Urban Fantasy discussion
MOVIES & TV
>
Reading a Series AND watching it's TV show?
date
newest »

Doesn't Dexter have less romance in it? That would stop me.... I don't watch it but that is because the one. I watched a little of I think a child was going to be killed..... I turned it off. I got scared.

LOLOLOLOL thats funny...... I know what you mean

Usually if I learn about a book by the time there is a film adaptation I wait and see the film first, then read the book. Otherwise I end up disappointed in the film. If I see the film first then I can accept them as different mediums and visions, but the reverse is rarely true for me.
I tried so hard, for so long, to give Alan Ball's vision a chance and accept that they were different mediums. When he had Bill ask Sookie to marry him I was appalled, but when he watered down Bill raping Sookie to just an over feeding he pretty much lost me. True Blood was "must see" tv when it started, now it's "if I get around to it" tv. But I still look forward to the books (even if I really can't stand the author's website).


I also enjoy how the tv series concentrates on a number of characters that merely stand in the background in the books. However, this may have a lot to do with the fact that the character of Sookie infuriates me on a regular basis.

Instead I'm going to list some of the things I prefer in True Blood.
1. I'm glad they kept LaFayette. Great character.
2. I agree with Elizabeth regarding the Russell Edgington in the media scene. Until that moment I considered Russell just another out of character character. That scene was smokin', though.
3. I like Jessica & don't mind the Hoyt side story.
4. I like the way the vamps die. What a gory mess.
That's it. That's all I can think of that I like about True Blood over the books. Like I said, I could write my own series on what I don't like that's different.



I sort of think of the series as like a spinoff from the books, and seen from other characters perspective, instead of just Sookie's. That helps me through it! ;)


As far as Dexter is concerned.... I am madly in Love with that series lol I didn't even have showtime and I ordered it just for Dexter. I have only read the first book from that series (again I read that before the TV series) and I still love both of them. How can you NOT love Michael C. Hall?! lol

To me the show and books are so different that I can do both and not be bothered. It's like 2 seperate things to me.
I watched a couple of seasons of Dexter but I've never read the books.
I've read a few of the Bones books but again-the show is so completely different that it's not an issue for me.

There were plot changes, but the characters were kept true to their comic counterparts so I didn't really mind.

Also Ian Somerhalder!

I am able to see them as completely separate. The books are about Sookie. The tv show is an ensemble.
I've never watched or read Dexter, but I enjoy "Bones" and I was totally bummed when I read one of the books that there were no "Squints." I read and watch Alexander McCall Smith's "No. 1 Ladies Detection Agency," which is another HBO show. (At least I hope it is.)
Going back some time, Lifetime's version of the Vicky Nelson books was pretty bad. So was the Sci Fi channel's Harry Dresden series. I love "The Walking Dead" on tv and intend to read the books.


I look at the Sookie series and True Blood show as two completely different series. As soon as I read the second book, I stopped comparing it to the show. It was the only way I could easily enjoy the books.
Same goes for Bones, although I think the books are pretty good. Some of the books, though I'd sprain something if I didn't roll my eyes at some of it. I really like the procedural parts of the books, but some of the plot is just a little hard to swallow.
I didn't care for the Harry Dresden books, and hoped that I would like the show, but it lacked something. I'm trying really hard to get through Fool Moon, but it's a struggle.

Also Ian Somer..."
I couldn't finish the first Vampire Diaries book but I absolutely love the show! I like how they changed Elena and Caroline's characters a lot.

I liked Fool Moon#2, but a lot of people don't. You might put it down and see if you like Grave Peril #3 better.

When it comes to Dexter the story is too similar to be separated between the book and TV-series. Some details have changed and a lot of side story has been added to the TV-series, but too little has changed for me to enjoy both. Still can't help to love different aspects of both the TV-series and the books, so it's hard to make a choice - on the other hand I haven't gotten far enough in the book series to have noticed the change in genre - thanks for the spoiler Urban! :-)
I read the sookie stackhouse books and watch the TV show. I find it both entertaining in diffrent ways. At the moment im reading a game of thrones, and cant wait to watch the series that comes in april.
I love supernatural, but havent wanted to read the books.
I love supernatural, but havent wanted to read the books.


The Dresden Files show was absolutely terrible. The books are way better.

They had Bianca and Dresden sleep together... if that gives you any perspective on how terrible it was.

But I kind of figured it probably wasn't good if it didn't last very long.
Not true of Firefly, Wonderfalls and Pushing Daisies.
Very true of the The Dresden Files...

But I kind of figured it probably wasn't good if it didn't last very long.
Not true of Firefly, Wonderfalls and Pushing Daisies.
Very true of the The Dresden Files..."
I LOVED Wonderfalls and Pushing Daisies. And I want to add Dead Like Me and Veronica Mars to the list!




They're not books, they are short lived tv series'. We were simply commenting on Mary's comment that if the series didn't last very long, it probably wasn't very good. These shows lasted 3 seasons at best but were excellent shows.

OK, just thought that I'd missed something.

We all did, Martin when they cancelled these shows. Thanks for explaining my comment, Elizabeth. I think "Wonderfalls" had three or four episodes before it was yanked. "Firefly" Fox showed maybe six episodes out of order and cancelled it. Was "Pushing Daisies" on two years, on two networks, a victim of the writer's strike I think, and networks not having a clue about what to do with it or market its wonderfulness.
There are books in the Firely 'verse. Don't recommend them though, and they came after the tv show & movie based on it "Serenity."


I can both watch True Blood and read the Southern Vampires series. They are different enough that I don't care that they started out in the same place.
It is a lot like King Arthur for me. Who's vision of King Arthur are we seeing. I, obviously, at this point haven't seen the new TV series since it hasn't quite started yet, but the fact that I've read books and seen other media King Arthur presentations won't stop me from watching this one at some point.

I've also read the Vampire Diaries and been watching the show. I liked the books but I think the series, with all it's melodrama and over the top eyebrow action from Damon, is actually better. It's fleshing out the character more and adding a few new friends in.
I'm a huge Dexter fan, though. I read the first three books before watching the show. I loved the show and even though none of the other seasons have kept with the book, I'm still a huge fan. Now, I can't read the Dexter books, because I like the show so much!

I am currently reading the latest book released in the series...does anyone think the Sookie character on TV is influencing the character in the book? Maybe it's my imagination, but I feel like the author is making her more like the character on tv. (as far as how she acts etc, not specifically what is going on) UGH!




I personally prefer Dexter's TV show compared to the book.I love the Dark Passenger concept the book had. It made Dexter's nature all the more mysterious, although it also amuse me when each psycho's Dark Passengers started roaring at each other. (it's like some kind of animal show off)
The murders in the books are pretty gory and disturbing, which makes things intriguing. But in 'Dexter in the Dark', the supernatural element felt weird.So weird I want to bury the book.
The TV show made things more realistic, and it's doing a great job with twists and cliffhangers. But I'll keep reading Dexter's book. They're pretty different, but it didnt matter much.
Walking dead's graphic novel are great (except the newer books-felt like soap opera), especially the Governor arc. I anxiously wait for the tv show's take on that arc. I was pretty ticked off by Season 1's ending, which tried to explain about the zombie plague. I think it was better to keep it in the common people's perspective.


I know they had the vampire TV show for the Tanya Huff Bloodline series, but I never watched it. Looks like that and Moonlight were canceled rudely anyway, so I'm glad I didn't.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Walking Dead, Vol. 1: Days Gone Bye (other topics)Grave Peril (other topics)
Fool Moon (other topics)
I can't seem to do both. I used to read the Sookie Stackhouse series but found the TV show to be MUCH more entertaining and stopped reading the books. I also love the tv show Dexter, but can't seem to even give the books a shot.