Young Adult Book Reading Challenges discussion

This topic is about
City of Bones
City of Bones
>
Does author's background cause you to not read this?
date
newest »






Of course, I should point out that another reason that the fic may be down is that the scene with Jace, his father, and the bird, was lifted nearly word for word from Draco Veritas- just switching Draco for Jace.
I just have to really try to take CoB as a separate thing from the fanfiction, and not let my opinion of the actual story be colored by what I know about her time as a HP BNF.

Personally, I never read her fan fiction because I was always afraid of getting to close to the crazy that is HP on the net :P but I had heard that some of the Draco Trilogy made it into the published stuffs.
I am going to try and find it, I read her LOTR stuff way back and I remember it being hilarious and fun. I don't know about the Draco Trilogy though I am going to try to find it to check it out.

And yes, HP fandom can be crazy. It can be a lot of fun, too, though, if you're willing to ignore the drama.
ETA: Here is a torrent for the DT: http://www.mininova.org/tor/772393

It just means a LOT of something.


But, Harry Potter is still covered by copyright, in fact, there is a lawsuit open right now against a fan who has tried to publish his fanfiction. If you are just a simple housewife at home writing a fun spoof on HP, it probably isn't that big of a deal. But, now that Clare is a published and popular author it is a big deal.
The verso page of City of Bones has a pretty standard copyright statement which says "Copyright 2007 by Cassandra Claire (notice it is the same spelling as her online pen-name), LLC All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in WHOLE OR IN PART IN ANY FORM." The copyright statement for Harry Potter is more extensive than most. So, now there is a published author who has broken copyright rules by using the characters and the fantastical world that was created and owned by another author. That is a huge taboo in the publishing world and illegal. It doesn't really matter that it was done before she was published.
The fanfic world is fun and entertaining, but it is plagiarism which isn't cool--I spend a huge portion of the school year teaching teens not to plagiarize and how to give credit for the ideas they use. It kind of irks me that this popular author has been involved in plagiarism.
However, when I read the book, I had not heard about any of this and I liked the book.

Fanfic can be fun, and I'd say the majority of authors don't mind or choose to ignore it. There are a handful who have issued a moratorium on fic (Anne McCaffrey and Anne Rice come to mind), and fans tend to respect the wishes of those authors. I don't have an issue with fanfic on its own; it can be a fun way to play in a world that you love while still stretching and practicing your writing skills. I do not, however, buy into the notion that because something is "just fanfic" that proper citation doesn't need to be used or that rules regarding giving credit can be bent. Especially when the fanfic is incredibly popular, I find that the writer is doing the fans a disservice to leave them in the dark with regards to their source material.
That said, there are a number of published authors that have written/do write fanfic, and participate in role-playing games, which are really like collective fanfic, so I wouldn't write an author off just for having participated in fanfic in some way. But if I'm aware of an author being shady with their fanfic, it will certainly make me look at their published work with a more suspicious eye.
As I said in an earlier post, though, with CoB I really tried to look at it as its own thing, separate from Cassandra Claire/Clare's HP fic. She made it hard by including scenes lifted wholesale from her Draco trilogy, but I still tried ;).

Ugh, Vander Dork and the Lexicon Wank >_< poor cleolinda! :P


(Imagine that I made the Sparkledammerung have the background sparklies!)

I listen to music based on what it's about, not who makes it and the same (usually) goes for movies (not a fan of Adam Sandler), so I think the same should extend to books.
The author is not the book, the book is the characters and the story. And then of course the blurb and the cover have to attract me (yes, I do judge books by their cover).




I like him, he does good work, but then he goes and does something stupid and horrible like Alice in Wonderland and I'm disappointed.
Like I said, I'll try and if I don't like it, it's not the writer's personal background that is at fault.
EG. If Lewis Caroll killed a dog (I'd hate him to death) would you refuse to read Alice in Wonderland?




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandr...
Personally I read her Lord of the Rings spoof and loved it!
Does this turn you off from this author to cause you to not read this book?