21st Century Book Club discussion
General Book Chat
>
Ambiguity vs. Clear Message
date
newest »


I don't really mind a book that preaches if it does it well. Robert J. Sawyer's work is a good example; the message in his books is pretty damn clear. I don't think subtlety is necessary right for everyone.

I respectfully disagree. There are more clever ways to make a point than by a simple essay/non-fiction. You can be simultaneously preachy and clever, a la Ursula K. Le Guin.
Interesting - I certainly don't like too much ambiguity in the plot, and am especially critical of ambiguous endings when there's been a big build-up as I often feel that is mainly due to the author not being able to think up something magnificent enough. Can't come up with an example though, just know this is something I can get irritated by.
I tend to prefer the latter; I think a good writer, aside from being generally compelling, leaves something of themselves in their work. Rather than trying to prod the reader into making up their own mind, a writer should express themselves. That being said, I can find ambiguity a lot easier to stomach if I don't agree with the writers views.