Glens Falls (NY) Online Book Discussion Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ABOUT BOOKS AND READING
>
What are U reading these days? (PART SEVEN) (2011) (ONGOING THREAD for 2011)

Thinking back, I read Lord of the Flies when I was about 10 or 11 and that was far more graphic and very realistic. Yet that's a classic. Go figure.

I think parents are over-protective now. I recently unfriended a person here because he was giving 1 star ratings & going on about how some classics were from the 'Marquis De Sade school of children's literature'. He was referring to books like Black Beauty, Where the Red Fern Grows, Old Yeller, & The Yearling. Just because he'd had similar tragedies in his life, he's keeping these books away from his kids & putting them down. That means, as a GR friend with similar tastes in books, he isn't any more.
While he's certainly entitled to his opinion, I find that kind of pessimistic view of these classics & the sheltering of kids distasteful, at best. Even he agreed that the books were well written. I loved all of them & found most of them to be quite heartening in most ways. Yes, they all have bad times & teach some hard lessons, but they were pretty upbeat for the most part. They were certainly true to life & I can't think of a better way to prepare a kid for real life than reading about it.
Most people seem to want to shelter their kids so completely now that it's silly. That doesn't prepare them very well for adulthood & all its attendant responsibilities & realities. No, instead they want to stuff them full of 'feel good' pap. This at a time when most people are so far removed from nature that they can eat a burger & think that shooting a deer is wrong.

I would say that if a child is brought up in a stable environment with a proper set of values, he probably won't be adversely affected by anything he reads. However, if a child has problems, those problems will affect every phase of his life and books will be the least of the causes.

That's my biggest problem with overprotecting children. It's irresponsible when parents don't give their children every tool, every advantage to face the adult world.
First, they're resilient and adaptable. Second, we cannot be there every moment of their lives to protect them. It's better to prepare them for the real world, to do otherwise is a disservice and detrimental to them in the long run.

Saying that a book is so well written that it hurts to read it & yet giving it 1 star is just wrong, IMO. Maybe taking away a star because it hurts, but denigrating something like 'Old Yeller' as being sadistic reading for a kid is blasphemy. That book was wonderful, just had a sad ending & you knew the kid was still going to go on & be a better person for his experience, so it wasn't all a downer.

I see that a film adaptation was made in 1957:
http://movies.netflix.com/Search?v1=O...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050798/
"A boy brings a yellow dog home. The dog loves the family as much as they love him, but can the love last ?"



I see that the NY Times has a review of it this week. It's at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/boo...
Excerpt:
"Indeed, the darkest and most engaging element in the novel is not the circus but the relationships between the children and their guardians, who resemble nothing so much as the kind of overattentive, hyper-achievement-oriented, controlling parents much decried in modern media."
Sounds very serious.



Yes, Nina, I read your son's interesting review. We'll have to keep our eye on the progress of this book. (_The Night Circus_)

Jackie, at least you got through the 3 books. I thought I'd be glad to be finished with The Sister by Poppy Adams, but the ending was riveting and suspenseful. So I was glad I stuck with it, even though at times I thought it was weird and I wondered where it was going. Also at times the descriptive parts bored me but I could tell that the author must enjoy describing things.


I have to say that I learned a lot about the metamorphosis of moths and butterflies while reading _The Sister_. It's an amazing process and the book makes you realize what a miracle it is.

I feel the same way about some series. Between wanting to know what happens to the characters & world, it's kept me reading far longer in some than I probably should have. I've felt that way about both of Laurell K. Hamilton's series (Anita Blake & Merry Gentry). I'm still reading E.E. Knight Vampire Earth series, but not buying the books too quickly after they're published.
I'm reading Mission of Honor, the 12th book of that series. While Weber's writing is getting a bit old, the world has expanded immensely, so it's still interesting. I'm afraid to take too much of a break because there are so many characters & complications, I could easily forget.

Yes, that's a definite problem with me. I sometimes take a break from a book for several days. When I go back, I don't remember who is who, especially if the story deals with many different characters, places, and times.
Sometimes, even if I don't take a long break, I find it hard to retain all the necessary background information if the book has too many characters and time shifts.
However, I maintain that if a book is written with enough exposition and character development, I will be able to handle it.




On the other hand, A Song of Ice & Fire series is so well written that it's complex and myriad storylines and bazillion characters are indelibly imprinted on my brain. The appendix section is approximately 100 pages of characters that I've never needed to consult. I guess it depends on what my brain wants to remember, lol

Jackie, I think it's also because, as you pointed out, it is "so well written".

I agree completely. These politics are somewhat interesting, though. Weber has a lot of historical & some present day politics mixed in. The Haven political system is heavily based on the French Revolution, for instance.

Eragon was well written too. I don't know what it is about that series though that makes me forget. I've read it twice now and I've held off on the 3rd book and am waiting for the 4th to come out next month. I hope that's the end of the series, because I'm not reading any of it until I have the complete series in hand.

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
I think the bit about "free will" is interesting.

I just rec'd an e-mail ad from the book store in Glens Falls, Dog Ate My Homework, that Inheritance #4 (by Christopher Paolini) will be out in November: Inheritance (Expected publication: November 8th 2011 by Random House ).


Jackie, you have a lot of patience! Your waiting was a good idea. I don't blame you.



How are you enjoying Brisingr? Is it as good as the other two of the series? I've heard that it is, but you and I share similar tastes, I'd trust your judgement above others.

The story is told in the third-person omniscient point-of-view. It's interesting to be aware of the different types of narrative mode as we read.
Wiki says that: "Third-person singular (he/she) is overwhelmingly the most common type of third-person narrative".
Below is a link to Wiki's page on "Narrative Mode":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrativ...
Wiki's outline is below:
1 Narrative point of view
1.1 First-person view
1.2 Second-person view
1.3 Third-person view
1.4 Alternating person view
2 Narrative voice
2.1 Stream-of-consciousness voice
2.2 Character voice
2.2.1 Unreliable voice
2.3 Epistolary voice
2.4 Third-person voices
2.4.1 Third-person, subjective
2.4.2 Third-person, objective
2.4.3 Third-person, omniscient
3 Narrative tense
3.1 Past tense
3.2 Present tense
3.3 Future tense
4 Other narrative modes
4.1 Fiction-writing mode
4.2 Other types and uses

I finish The Hunger Games trilogy. It was good, although not very unique in the underlying themes.
I just started The Witch's Daughter by Paula Brackston. Sections are titled by the Celtic calendar, chapters by contemporary date and phase of the moon. The main character, Elizabeth, is into herblore which is of personal interest to me as I make my own medicines from herbs.

Some day we'll have to talk about the herbs you use as medicines. Interesting.

We're so conditioned to think pharmaceuticals are better, stronger, that we disregard herbals are 'inferior'. I know I did. I was surprised when I tried it and learned just how much better herbs are. I have achieved years of relief from a one time treatment for TMJ and my burisitis is completely cured after 3 days of treatment. I'll always choose herbs now that I know better. And they have the added bonus of being significantly cheaper.

Joy, Barb's into herbs, too (though she doesn't gather her own), and I take some regularly as well. We've been very pleased with the results we've had.




I see that the book was first published in 1981. So it's definitely an early book by Siddons.
I've got The Night Circus on my keep-in-mind shelf. It will be interesting to see how it goes. I see that it's now #5 on NY Times Best Seller List for Hardcover Fiction.
Description: "Two young rivals at a magical circus become collaborators as they fall in love." FROM: http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-b...

A rather standard plot but well-written. Characterization a bit above average for this type of story.

I wish you lived near me, I'd let you borrow my HP & The Deathly Hollows.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Great Expectations (other topics)Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French and Americans (other topics)
Never Cry Wolf: The Amazing True Story of Life Among Arctic Wolves (other topics)
Bel Canto (other topics)
State of Wonder (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Edward T. Hall (other topics)Ann Patchett (other topics)
Andre Norton (other topics)
Dean Koontz (other topics)
Andrea Mitchell (other topics)
More...
I don't think this mother has the right call it 'filth'. Had she taken the time to actually read it, she'd see it's not as bad as she thinks it is. The entertainment is really a punishment for rebellion, no one is entertained, they are forced to watch their children in a battle to the death. So no, it's not 'entertainment'. Also, for all it's implied content, there wasn't much graphic violence. No more than an average dystopian novel, in fact, far less than most. Why her kid had nightmares, I don't know. If the kid paid attention, it was actually a love story.