Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Policies & Practices
>
Question about combining "editions"
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Leslie
(new)
Dec 09, 2010 01:32AM

reply
|
flag

What you have is another edition of the book and you combine it with the others to give 3 versions of the book.
I think you are confusing combining with merging.

I don't, however, have another edition. These all claim to be first editions, but they have different ISBNs, which is why I'm confused.
I did not know there was a merge function, and so I believe you're right that I am confusing that option with the combine function. I'll go read up on that now, but if someone knows why the same edition would have more than one ISBN, it would sure help clear things up for me!

Also, it is perfectly possibly for mutiple (often simultaneously released) ISBNs to all be "the first edition". Most commonly this happens when there are different US/UK/Aus editions, but sometimes publishers seem to use multiple ISBNs just for the heck of it. ;)

Re: edition numbers in titles, I see you removed them from there and they appear only in the edition field now. That answers another question I had, which was "Is that field only for 'special' edition notations such as 'large print' or 'anniversary' editions, or can it be used for 1st, 2nd, etc?" But it raises another question: should the edition explicitly NOT appear in the title? I've seen many that do, and added it to some of the ones I've edited based on that trend. It does make the "right" edition easier to find when you're searching for a specific one...
Leslie wrote: "But it raises another question: should the edition explicitly NOT appear in the title?"
No, it should not. The edition field was only added relatively recently, but that's where all info like that should go.
No, it should not. The edition field was only added relatively recently, but that's where all info like that should go.






MissJessie: sadly, the only used bookstore in my city closed last February!