Terminalcoffee discussion
Rants / Debates (Serious)
>
I would like to declare right now that I don't give a flying (bleep) about Prince William's wedding
date
newest »


Yes, I was yelling, just like I did to my father-in-law when it came on his TV.


I know what’s in that frumpy little square purse of hers: the royal rigid female pleasure device.
::yawn::
Hang on I should pay attention, this is our future King we are talking about.
::spots something shiny::
Hang on I should pay attention, this is our future King we are talking about.
::spots something shiny::

There was some question there for a while about Charles’ eligibility after he married what’s his name, Camilla. I believe the Queen considers Charles too conspicuous a nutter ever to be King, though it seems to me that such an entirely superfluous position requires a person of the highest bat-shitedness.


i don't think there's anything wrong with royalty. yes, it's mainly ceremonial, but it is something you share as a country. and they probably cost the country money, but a lot of members of the royal family have a day job.
I could give three shits about the royals but if they modeled a reality show around them, I'd be on it like ugly on a gorilla.
That is one seriously dysfunctional (and seemingly inbred) tribe right there.
That is one seriously dysfunctional (and seemingly inbred) tribe right there.

Well, I for one think Prince William is cute, and I'll tune in for all the wedding preparations and the pomp and circumstance of the wedding day. When is it, anyway? 2014?
Well, yes, Bun, that makes sense. But I think what I was thinking of was just hearing about how because of his age, and the Queen's long reign, they figured that she'd still be alive when Charles' sons were of age and that they'd just be a more natural next place.
It isn't based in reason, my logic.
It isn't based in reason, my logic.

:D"
Hopefully Kate's dress is more tasteful than Diana's monstrosity that needed around 10 not-so-small children to carry the train.
Lets just skip Charlie & Billy they are both gaumless. Put in Harry at least he is a little more interesting.
So Harry has a nasty side? I wasn't aware of that, I don't pay that much attention to the royals.
P.S. The royals don't have that much influence.
P.S. The royals don't have that much influence.

It must suck to be the older one in line for the throne and you are stuck having to marry the uppity, proper society wench.
Hm, Harry is the sexy beast out of those two. In a teenage boy, sort of way. Not that I'm into that. Um.
**joins Kev behind ficus**
**joins Kev behind ficus**

When they go into the woods at Bamoral hunting for a G-spot it’s really hot.



[book:Secrets to..."
WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?!! Are you pimping porn in our group?!!?

**joins Kev behind ficus**"
Come out from behind the ficus, Sallers, and high five me. I'm totally with you on this.


I remember the Charles and Diana wedding, what a hoopla! We were watching it at work, and one of my co-workers was bawling. I thought it went on interminably. I'd want to sit down. Still, Diana was all young and fresh, dewy, and look how that turned out!
I'm not into it, but I hope they are happy.
However, did you know that according to some British rule he had to ask the Queen if he could get married? That's what they said on CNN, anyway.
The British and their royalty are weird.
I already hate this wedding and the fact it will be on the news.
That is all.