Ling AP Lit. and Comp. 2010-11 discussion
What is Truth?
>
Fatalism and Optimism: Are They Mutually Exclusive?
date
newest »




Julia is living for the moment. She may not fully realize the magnitude of her crimes in the Party's standards. She is not fully conscious of her actions, her wrongs and her future. Therefore, she may not be able to stand it when she is captured by the Thought Police.

What if instead of the Thought Police as the danger, Winston and Julia were diagnosed with terminal cancer? The issue is not that the means of the Thought Police are horrific, but merely that the Thought Police will kill anyone who chooses to dissent. Similarly, cancer will kill anyone who chooses to smoke tobacco. What matters is that Winston and Julia know that they have willingly caused their death. If the end is the same, then why should Winston not take part in Julia's happiness and remain in his constant gloom?


Julia disagrees, retorting, "Don't you enjoy being alive? Don't you like feeling: This is me, this is my hand, this is my leg, I'm real, I'm solid, I'm alive!.....Then stop talking about dying" (113).
Their argument makes me wonder: how should one face one's impending death? With a sense of cold, submissive, fatalistic realism, as Wilson does? Or with Julia's belief that it is "somehow possible to construct a secret world in which you could live as you choose," so long as you had "luck and cunning and boldness?" (113)