The Sword and Laser discussion
Masterpiece Mystery! - new Sherlock Holmes
message 1:
by
Tamahome
(new)
Oct 24, 2010 07:29PM

reply
|
flag




I liked the treatment given the new Holmes and Watson, and enjoyed the episode.


In the Novel Watson was an War Vet who had been wounded in an Afghanistan war. He took months to recover from his wound which he did by hanging out in London by himself, living off of government pay until he got to the point that he needed a roommate.
In the the TV series they gave Watson the exact same background. It was refreshing to see the modern take on it and to remember that Watson was a young soldier when Holmes and he first met - not the stuffy overweight middle age man he is so often portrayed as in TV and movies.

But why oh why is it only 3 episodes? I was getting used to the fact that UK shows have 6 eps in a season, but this has 3? Strange. They are 1+ hours each, but still...

Better news! Peter Jackson thinks Sherlock is so awesome that he's going to work the film schedule so Martin Freeman can do season 2.




and in real life he is a Motown fan and afficianado, another plus.

The BBC took a gamble on Sherlock, not much of a gamble in my opinion given that the creative team all came from Doctor Who and Torchwood, but a gamble all the same. This type of program is very expensive to make and the BBC only have limited funds, paid for by the UK TV license. They are under extreme pressure at the moment to keep their production costs low so decided to produce a short run of Sherlock to test the waters. Thankfully the reaction to the series was overwhelmingly positive and they got the green light for 3 more episodes.


That guy from House is British -- English actors find our barbarous colonial accents easy to immitate. Fans of BBC comedies know him as Prince George/Lt. George from the last two seasons of Blackadder, and Bertie from Jeeves & Wooster.

That guy from House is British -- English actors find our barbarous colonial accents easy to immitate. Fans of BBC comedie..."
Hugh Is a really week known character this side of the pond and originally came to prominence on Tv here as part of a comedy partnership with Steven Fry. their show, called ' A little bit of Fry and Lawrie' was very good . He appeared in every series of Black Adder as various characters and was brilliant in the last series, Black Adder Goes Forth, as George, a foppish army officer who shared a trench with Capt. Blackadder. The final episode of that series is, to my mind, the most moving final scene of a comedy series ever produced. For those American readers here, I beg you to look it up and prepare toe amused and moved at the same time.

Like the others have said, Hugh Lawrie is English. He is no relation to Benedict Cumberbatch who plays Sherlock Holmes.


All of " A Bit of Fry and Laurie" and "Black Adder" are available to stream on Netflix. "Jeeves and Wooster" is only available on DVD. Go watch my American cousins.


Aw, I loved Andrew Scott's Moriarty so much that I flew over to London to see him at the Old Vic.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0107950/
The current show's refusal to deal with Holmes' drug addiction is revisionist, politically correct BS.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0107950/
The ..."
Interesting point Lepton. I think however that moving the character to modern times makes it right that not everything that Holmes did in the 19th century would be done by a 21st century Holmes.
The 19th century Holmes experimented with drugs because he was a curious and fearless investigator. the evils of drug addiction was not nearly so well understood in those days and I am in no doubt that the old Holmes was seeking new experiences and possibilities for enhancement of his faculties.
A Holmes today however would have grown up knowing only too well the benefits and drawbacks of opiate and cocaine use. I think it a first rate decision for the programme makers to take this into account without losing sight of Holmes essential character.

What? In a Study in Pink when the police turn Sherlocks flat upside down a drugs bust it's made pretty clear that he's a former user, though he claims to be clean at the time. Isn't that enough for you?

Doyle's Holmes is a man burdened by his gifts and his insights into human nature. Holmes is what some might call a highly functional person with near sociopathic tendencies. Holmes lacks compassion or empathy. His use of opiates was meant to assuage the burden of his all-encompassing intellect and curioisty. I take it more as a self-medicating individual with bipolar disorder and a touch of the savant.
Doyle's Holmes is neither a romantic character nor one for which, I think, we are meant to muster much compassion, whereas this new Holmes is merely a kind of neurotic, obsessive nerd. Far more relatable and likeable than Doyle's Holmes.
Cumberbatch's Holmes is a geek sex-figure like a latter day Spock whose secret pain every women wished to soothe, whereas Doyle's Holmes is the epitome of the asexual detective.
Essential character indeed.

What? In a Study in Pink when the police turn Sherlocks flat upside down a drugs bust it's made pretty clear that he's a former user, though he claims to be clean at the time. Isn't that enough for you?"
I don't have the episode on hand but I do recall at some point Holmes stating something to the effect that he wouldn't be so stupid as to take drugs. This irked me at the time and it is what I do remember, perhaps in error.
Two points though:
1. Holmes' drug habitat is not first witnessed or discussed until The Sign of Four, not A Study in Scarlet, so the episode to my mind is not faithful to the source material in that sense as well as the dismal of existence of the drug problem.
2. Doyle makes it a point that Watson recount how he weens Holmes off of cocaine in "The Adventure of the Missing Three-Quarte” and that it was a continuing addiction for Holmes.
My recall of the episodes is that the notion of Holmes being an addict is passed off as a joke and as a kind of a wink and a nod to the audience that this is not going to be the Holmes that you know.

I don't have the episode on hand but I do recall at some point Holmes stating something to the effect that he wouldn't be so stupid as to take drugs. This irked me at the time and it is what I do remember, perhaps in error.
That's more or less the opposite of what happened. John implies that he thinks Sherlock is too cerebral to be a druggie and Sherlock is slightly annoyed at the assumption
John: Seriously this guy a junkie? Have you met him
Sherlock (trying to shut him up): John
John: I'm pretty sure you could search this flat all day and you wouldn't find anything you could call recreational.
Sherlock : John you really want to shut up now.
John: Yeah but come on. [Pause, looks at Sherlock, eyes widen] noo
Sherlock: What?
John: You?
Sherlock: Shut up
Where the series diverges from the books isn't really of interest to me.

What? In a Study in Pink when the police turn Sherlocks flat upsi..."
and as I've said, a modern day Holmes must have a different attitude to hard drugs than a Victorian one. It is utter nonsense to expect otherwise.


1.A Scandal in Belgravia 1 January 2012
2.The Hounds of Baskerville 8 January 2012
3.The Reichenbach Fall 15 January 2012
I seen the first episode, and I must say the wait was worth it ;)

And I have to say, I though it to be one of the best written pieces of TV I have ever seen.

Personally, I loved last night's episode. Sometimes with long-form TV shows I think, "When is the episode over?" others get it just right but with Sherlock I keep wondering, "how much time is left? That much? Nice!" I almost wish they were full-length movies instead of this almost-movie-TV-show-homunculi-thing.
The worst part is that this one, as stated, is only three episodes and we'll have to wait until the end of the year (if not then than it will be in early 2013) to see the next set.

Personally, I loved last night's episode. Sometimes with long-form TV ..."
Sorry to disappoint, but it took a 1 1/2 years for this series to pop up. I guess between writing Doctor Who and his recent movie work with Tintin is keeping Stephen Moffat pretty busy.
Saw the episode a few hours ago and absolutely loved it. Sure the portrayal of Adler was pretty different, but there wasn't a great deal to go on with from the original story. They managed to keep the important bits and captured their relationship pretty well I thought. Looking forward to the other episodes with more than a little enthusiasm.

It's been so long since I read the books that I'd forgotten about her character entirely. I'm glad they're starting to work in more of the fact that Holmes was actually something of a martial arts expert in the books. The movies made full use of that talent but I don't remember it being as prominent in the show.


Part of me thinks, "Damn, you're right." Then I remember that it involves The Hobbit. So, yeah.
Dunno how big Cumberbatch's role will be. I mean, his character barely gets more than a mention.

In the first film... then we get full on dragon action!
and, as you say, it's the GODDAMN HOBBIT!

What a take on Irene Adler!

