Jane Austen discussion

67 views
The Writer > How was it to be a writer in the 1700's

Comments Showing 1-32 of 32 (32 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Michele (new)

Michele (myavino) | 5 comments I know that it wasn't easy for women to write during Jane Austen's time. Novel reading during Austen's time wasn't seen as being "respectable". So you can imagine what it was like if you were a woman who wanted to write.


message 2: by Bluebell (new)

Bluebell  | 3 comments That's a very interesting question. I particularly like female authors of that time and from what I've read, it was not easy to be a female writer. That's why several female writers used a pen name to write their books. Moreover, as you can guess, women didn't have much rights at that time (politically but also socially). They had to respect a way of bahaving, and writing books wasn't really part of what they had to do! For Jane Austen, she had some success when she managed to publish her books but the latter have been "rediscovered" in a certain way today and have much more success now.


message 3: by Sarah (new)

Sarah (sjess421) | 1 comments I would find it scary to write at that time period. I find it funny how women were allowed to learn to write, but never to write books. Here they sat at their homes most of the day stitching things for their future families with much time on their hands and a ink pen and paper in front of them. No one could blame Jane Austen for writing, she had the writers mind. And look at what we have now, more than 7 incredible books which were all made into movies!


message 4: by Irene (new)

Irene | 271 comments Jane Austen was lucky, she grew up in a family that allowed her to read, improve her mind and write since she was a girl. At first she wrote plays for her brothers and sister to perform for family and friends.
In Regency time a woman can't publish her book without the consent of her father or her husband. Actually a woman didn't exist as an individual: she was a daughter or a wife or a sister.
That's why at first Reverend Austen tried to sell Jane work to an editor and, after his death, was one of her brothers who taked care of business with the London editor.
From society point of view, the only acceptable reason for a woman to write was to economically substain her family, for example if she was a widow or if she has an sick parent.
Jane Austen first published novel was Sense and Sensibility and was published as written by "An Author". Pride and Prejudice, published some years latare, was written by "The author of Sense and Sensibility".
So her identity was unknown to the great audience (poor Jane).


message 5: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
It is a shame it was like that. She needed more recognition when she was alive and 2 of her novels weren't even published when she was alive!!


message 6: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca May | 561 comments Oh, "The author of Sense and Sensibility" sounds like such a sad way to get acknowledged! Although Sense and Sensibility is a great book. And "An Author" sounds just as bad. Ah well, at least my two favorites were published while she was alive.
Which ones were published after her death? That would be awful! I wish she could be here today to see how much we love her work.


message 7: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
Northanger Abbey and Persuasion were published after.
It's a shame she couldn't use her name. But because of how men were considered inferior to woman it is understandable. But it's a real shame!


message 8: by Sarah (new)

Sarah Louise Smith (sarahlouisesmith) It makes me sad that she wouldn't have known how huge she would be. I'd like to go back in time and let her know, that 200 years later, she'd be one of the most successful and famous authors of all time! She died far, far too young too :(


message 9: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
If I could, I would!! It is so sad!!


message 10: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca May | 561 comments :'( I agree with you both! It would be great if she had lived longer and wrote more, and I would love to go back and meet her too, Sarah! We need to figure out a way to do this...


message 11: by Sarah (new)

Sarah Louise Smith (sarahlouisesmith) Now there's a good book idea....
:)


message 12: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca May | 561 comments Haha it totally is! What would we call it? :)


message 13: by Sarah (new)

Sarah Louise Smith (sarahlouisesmith) I am rubbish with titles, my novel is named after my main characters!
I can see the movie though... The JA forum members get in a time machine and go back to inform Jane how loved she is! :)


message 14: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
YES! and we can all star in the film!


message 15: by Marren (new)

Marren | 764 comments I would not mind working with Andrew Davis (think that is his name, remaking these classics. Like the others said because of the position that women held socially, economically and politically it was much easier on men to be writers. Jane mentions Radcliffe's novels in her work and she may have been a source of inspiration for her. Remember when Tilney was teasing Catherine about women and novel writing. Men were regarded as writing the edifying books whilst women wrote trifling novels. Pen names were frequent. Jane Austen you are an inspiration to me.


message 16: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
Jane Austen is an inspiration to me as well!
It was very common then and it is sad about woman writing the silly novels! Couldn't have phrased it better myself Marren :)


message 17: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
I would love to work with Andrew Davis as well - his adaptations are wonderfully accurate!


message 18: by Marren (new)

Marren | 764 comments Indeed, it would be an amazing experience :D


message 19: by Sarah (new)

Sarah Louise Smith (sarahlouisesmith) Inspiration to me too. Before I found a publisher for my novel, and kept wondering if I'd ever get published, I kept remembering that if Jane Austen could do it in the 1700's when women were not 'supposed' to be writers, I can do it now when there's no such barrier! (not that I'd ever compare my writing to her... I wish!)


message 20: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
Good on you! What you say is so true though!


message 21: by Marren (new)

Marren | 764 comments You go Sarah! :D


message 23: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
That's a great article! I have read that before!


message 24: by Sarah (new)

Sarah Louise Smith (sarahlouisesmith) Great article Marren!


message 25: by Marren (new)

Marren | 764 comments Found in on someone's topic on Goodreads.


Victoria_Grossack Grossack (victoriagrossack) | 66 comments I'm kind of amazed by all writers before computers.


message 27: by Marren (new)

Marren | 764 comments Same with me Victoria :).


message 28: by Marcy (new)

Marcy (marshein) Wow! I wrote four novels pre-computer! Now I look back and it's like so quaint what we had to do, with cut and paste literally using scotch tape!


message 29: by Sophie, Your Lovely Moderator (new)

Sophie | 2624 comments Mod
Ahaha. Wow Marcy!


Andrea AKA Catsos Person (catsosperson) | 235 comments Anyone who ever wrote for novels pre-computer should be commended.


message 31: by Marcy (new)

Marcy (marshein) Okay, commend me! But I am certainly not the only one. There's, um, Tolstoy, and Dickens, and Austen, and....shall I continue?


Andrea AKA Catsos Person (catsosperson) | 235 comments I see your point, Marcy ;-).


back to top