Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
discussion
YES and NO on hands
date
newest »



I think because he was a sculptor, hands were much more important than just a simple head yes/no nod/shake. Hands were virtually the continuation and the language of his creative soul.
Besides, not all body signs are universally interpreted in different cultures. But it is only my humble opinion.


Stuart, what is your explanation of this self-imposed loss of linguistic abilities and a very limited vocabulary? I believe that he saw the world in its most fundamental embodiment and used the most polysemantic words to convey a myriad of meanings.

I tend not to read much into the meanings behind things in the books I read though, so I doubt you'll find a challenging or interesting opinion in this comment. :)
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Just something interesting to me, wondered if anyone else noticed it and what you think it means.