Fantasy Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Sailing to Sarantium
2010 Group Read Discussions
>
8/10 Sailing to Sarantium- Sarantium and Byzantium
date
newest »



I think it was called 'The Lord's Wisdom' or 'The Creator's Wisdom' in the book ... almost a direct tranlation of Hagia Sophia (the latter means 'wisdom' iirc).

It was awesome and I was thrilled! Had always wanted to go there. Studied it in my Art History classes eons ago.

Oh yes! That's right. Kay must've been there, don't you think?

Probably a Wikipedia-level background suffices.
Actually, I found it irritating that Kay didn't use the real names and places. I kept having to shift gears between history and the books. So what if he chooses to introduce fantasy or re-write history? Maybe he felt freer if unconstrained by our expectations. (If so, he failed, because any student of history couldn't help but compare his world and ours.)

Also, magic is an important element in this story. It's not as in your face as a Steven Erikson novel, but it's there. By stepping away from "our" world and "our" history, he can also stretch the imagination with magic and its effects.

Ravenna is a fantastic place to visit. It's a UNESCO World Heritage site because of the quality and endurance of the mosaics there. Justinian (Valerius) and Theodora (Alixana) and their retinue are depicted in the Basilica of San Vitale, but my favorite mosaics were in a smallish building known as the Mausoleum of Galla Placida. I h-a-d read both of Kay's Sarantine novels when I visited Ravenna and so felt like I could appreciate better what I was seeing thanks to Kay's wonderful descriptions of how Crispin and the other mosaicists thought about their art and craft.

I've not made it to Ravenna, but for mosaics, St. Mark's Cathedral in Venice can't be beat. It was a jewel of loveliness. I hope they can keep it from falling into the sea!
But Kay's use of the Byzantine history didn't bother me at all. I didn't even think of it as being like Istanbul, as he had a map in the front. The man writes fantasy and uses settings somewhat familiar and relatable to us. I'm dying to read Lions of Al Rassan and Under Heaven.

This discussion illustrates the danger of fictionalizing history: causal readers get confused over what is real and what is fiction.
So, I change my mind: Kay was correct in defining a parallel world. Otherwise the naive might mistake his "history" for real history--like folks who think Irving Stone movies are true.

THEN, he throws in those fantastical elements - a zubir, mechanical birds with souls - and makes the characters we have come to identify with DEAL with those and incorporate them into their own realities. We see them grow, change their view of themselves and others, make choices that delight us or move us or horrify us. Kay's artfulness allows me to watch them do that in the contexts he constructs from choice bits of the known historical world. That is why I look for Kay's next book above all others!

OOps, my dyslexia reversed the order.

To do the same thing from a 'real' historical period distorts things, because the 'real' story is still tied up in today's views, today's values, and the cultural biases still held. He has crafted the story and the dynamics without those biases - I find history entangling in that regard: very hard to understand what may have happened, because of who wrote the account, and the very different biases held by the people of the day.
Stories are all filtered through the individual viewpoint of the writer, then through the interpreter of that writer. The further one gets from the actual time period, the more the boundaries blur between fact, legend, then myth.
Kay's fiction accepts the myth; where 'so called real' history claims the myth does not exist.
Sarantium, in both its halves, explores this aspect in a fantasy nutshell.

Kay riffs on this idea of history filtered through individual viewpoints with his Pertennius character (whose part is a bit larger in the second book). Who was it said something like, "History is written by the winners."



http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/3...
To sum it up: yes, we can assume people have read the book except for the posts marked for no spoilers. But on the flip side, we aren't assuming anyone has read LoE.

http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/3...
To sum it up: yes, we can assume peo..."
I'm flubbing up right and left today. If all else fails read the intro, eh?


I've found that having a little knowledge of the history, or at least the geographical area he is using, helps with name pronunciation.

Quite by accident, I caught part of a documentary my wife was streaming on Netflix on the Dark Ages yesterday. It briefly covered the plague and Justinian's rule. It was way more interesting after reading the book.


Very true. :)
It's easy to see the link between the Sarantine empire of Sailing to Sarantium and the Byzantine of our world. Did you find yourself researching anything about the Eastern Roman Empire and Constantinople? Did you make comparisons to the story?
I did some research, mostly on Wikipedia. Not a whole lot, as I was afraid I'd stumble on something that might inadvertantly ruin what's to come in this book and the second volume. But it was interesting to see the influence as I read, especially the parts about the Rhodians and Emperor Valerius's desire to restore the Empire to its old greats.