Children's Books discussion
Specific Books & Authors
>
Muggie Maggie, by Beverly Cleary / Cursive vs. Print Writing
date
newest »




message 6:
by
Cheryl, Host of Miscellaneous and Newbery Clubs
(last edited Jul 22, 2010 04:13PM)
(new)
Oh very cool suggestion! (msg 8). It reminds me that in 6th grade in Carson City the kids learn to 'write' their names in Egyptian hieroglyphics. Well, if they could do that, certainly they could learn to write their cursive signature during a 'formerly useful aesthetically pleasing crafts' unit!
Of course, show of hands, who has a legibly cursive signature now? Not me!
Now, if we could get the school boards to agree....
Of course, show of hands, who has a legibly cursive signature now? Not me!
Now, if we could get the school boards to agree....
I like tha,t "He also used to show it off to girls at parties!!" Maybe teachers could motivate the boys to use better cursive to make their love notes more romantic.
I have a completely different story. I started school in Germany, and we actually never learned to print, we had to use cursive script right away. My problems started in grade four when we moved to Canada. Not only was my cursive script a bit different because I had learned it in Germany, but I did not know how to print legibly. And, even today, I write better and faster using cursive writing, printing has always been hard (well, I actually had to teach myself how to print, as the teachers in grade four did not really believe me when I pointed out that I could not print, I learned it, but it looks terrible, come to think of it, so does my cursive writing, no one can ever read my notes).

I think they just text now. Not romantic at all.
Wilhelmina wrote: "Cheryl wrote: "I like tha,t "He also used to show it off to girls at parties!!" Maybe teachers could motivate the boys to use better cursive to make their love notes more romantic."
I think they ..."
I would agree, and I would not at all be trilled to receive a love note on my cell phone, really does destroy the romance of it all.
I think they ..."
I would agree, and I would not at all be trilled to receive a love note on my cell phone, really does destroy the romance of it all.
Well I guess the boys who take the time to write a note, even if in manuscript, would be more likely to make the girls swoon. Teach that trick to your sons, nephews, students! :)

When I taught Grades 3/4, I taught D'Nealian style print and cursive because I like the way the letters were formed and moved easily from the print to the joined letters. I never liked Zaner-Bloser cursive letters.
Teaching cursive to students with special needs - with fine motor, visual, and other writing struggles - can be a very useful tool.
I wonder if some of the "speed" of writing is related to what writing style you learned first. I write faster in cursive writing (not very legibly, but, my printing is pretty unreadable as well), which might be because, as I mentioned, I learned cursive writing right from the start, and never actually was taught how to print. I actually have always had pretty lousy penmanship, and not due to lack of trying. In Germany, one of our report card marks was for penmanship (our writing style), and I always had pretty horrible marks. But, I've also recently discovered that I might actually be left-handed, and was likely forced to become right-handed when I started school. I wonder sometimes, if students having problems with learning cursive writing (or printing) might have similar issues, or, as Bernadette stated, fine motor problems (I know that I have always had major struggles with fine motor control).

In fifth grade my teacher would give needy students extra materials. We all wanted all of them. The only one I ever got was something to improve handwriting. (It didn't work.)
I always blamed it on being left handed, but there are plenty of lefties who have good writing so that's probably not it.

I do, however, work with children with special needs who have fine motor control issues. We allow them to use the computer for much of their written work because they can get there thoughts and ideas out easier and faster. It seems to really help them with the content of what they are writing.

Personally, I find printing so much easier that I have only used cursive when it was mandated (back in third to sixth grades). Probably this is because I hold my pencil incorrectly, so forming the letters in cursive is tricky and not flowing the way it is supposed to be. Which may be an argument for teaching it to children.

My son had a similar problem. He started out ambidextrous but favored the left more. Then he was forced into picking one hand by his Kindergarten teacher. The emphasis was placed on using his right hand for printing. It made it so hard for so long because in my mind he was still "wired" for using both hands that he naturally switched back and forth while writing. The confusion came in when he had to use one hand and we started to see alot of letter and number reversals. It is sorted out now but was hard at first.
I'm so glad that left-handed children are seldom forced, any longer, to switch. A child who is ambidextrous should be celebrated!
I like [laying with the computer fonts that look like cursive writing - anybody ever use those?
Bumping an old question: Chandra, or anybody who lives in a district where cursive is no longer taught, how do the children learn how to write their signatures?
I like [laying with the computer fonts that look like cursive writing - anybody ever use those?
Bumping an old question: Chandra, or anybody who lives in a district where cursive is no longer taught, how do the children learn how to write their signatures?

(the old question ;-) )

One of the beneficial things about children learning to read and write cursive script is that it exposes them to a type of writing that is slightly different than printed Latin letters. There are many different types of scripts in the world and by exposing a child to a script that's slightly different than printed letters, it might make it easier for them to recognise and/or learn languages that use scripts and alphabets different from our own (like Greek or Russian, for example) or to read handwriting samples or handwritten manuscripts (which is often not easy).
That's an interesting theory Gundula, that being able to read cursive might help one to be able to learn other scripts. Quite plausible.
My questions, especially for teachers, are:
1. Is cursive still considered important?
2. Why?
3. If you've read the book, do you approve of the tricky strategy used on the girl?
My answers are
1. slightly
2. can help you take notes faster sometimes
3. no
I'm a mom, with a 4 yr B.S. in Elem. Education, 47 years old, and I forget most of the cursive I've learned and almost never use it. My 14 yo was taught cursive, but his teacher was not able to persuade us of the importance of it.