Memoirs of a Geisha
discussion
Did anyone think it would have been better if it was really a memoir?
message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jun 21, 2008 06:23PM
OK, I read this book at 19, and the entire time I thought it was a true story. The epilogue that explained it was fiction was a COMPLETE letdown! In fact, I think that's what kind of turned me off of fiction to this day ten years later--I prefer non-fiction.
reply
|
flag










I put aside the fictional part and put it down as a worthy read.



jiro

It is as narrow-minded to believe that an individual cannot be racist or sexist as it is to believe that the characteristics of a person are inferior because of his or her race, religion, sex or orientation.
Both attitudes prevent discussion and opportunities to learn about individuals (which may make it possible for wrong-headed attitudes to change).

Who are we learning about, the geisha or Arthur Golden? The suspension of disbelief is more easily accomplished in subjects one knows little about. In fiction usually the reader trusts the author. Has Golden examined his attitudes towards his subject and purged his work of sexist and racist titillation? This is an area rife with societally accepted sexist and racist iconography.


I loved it

I don't agree with you, but I respect your right to your opinion





I agree, John.


"
i was impressed, i thought all along it was real, and when i found out it wasn't, it really surprised me. i still love the book, and feel like the author did an incredible job of making me believe



I read this book many years back. I thoroughly enjoyed the story line. It did give an insight into the life of a geisha and Japanes culture.







1. The author is American.
2. He researched and added other things so the plot would call more the attention.
It was so bad that the author couldn't respect the woman's anonymity. So she wrote her autobiography.

That was my understanding as well. But honestly, I've read both and I think one needs to keep in mind that Mineko was a geisha during a very different time period (the 60s and 70s) from when Golden's novel takes place (30s and 40s). That's why I also recommended Autobiography of a Geisha because it's a very, very different story to Mineko's Geisha of Gion/Geisha: A Life and takes place earlier in history, around the same time Golden's novel does. The novel is sort of combination between the two autobiographies which is why it's important to read both.


I was under the impression that he did respect her privacy, only that she w..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memoirs_...
I actually loved this book. I figured it wasn't non-fiction because of certain things in the story structure, they were just too, well, fiction, and life usually doesn't have a rosy ending. That was my biggest indicator, though I did like that everything worked out for her.
Great book, the author really knew his stuff, at least as much as an author really can. They're fallible and all that just like anyone else, especially if they weren't alive in that time period, in that part of the world, or was occupied as an actual geisha (kind of hard for a guy, haha). So yeah, I give him props.
Great book, the author really knew his stuff, at least as much as an author really can. They're fallible and all that just like anyone else, especially if they weren't alive in that time period, in that part of the world, or was occupied as an actual geisha (kind of hard for a guy, haha). So yeah, I give him props.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Geisha, a Life (other topics)
Geisha of Gion (other topics)
Autobiography of a Geisha (other topics)
Autobiography of a Geisha (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
Geisha, a Life (other topics)Geisha, a Life (other topics)
Geisha of Gion (other topics)
Autobiography of a Geisha (other topics)
Autobiography of a Geisha (other topics)
More...